English   |    French

  Saturday PM

Mystery of victims confidential motion in Ruto's ICC case

Journalists for Justice / 09 March 2016

Wilfred Nderitu, theCommon  Legal Representative for the Victims in the  William Ruto and Joshua Sang cases has revealed that he has filed a confidential motion at the ICC.

Although he did not disclose the contents of the motion, he said that its objective was to raise the victims' visibility.

Nderitu challenged the media to engage with the victims more than they have done.

“The press has leant towards the defence because they want to make news. If they want to make news, sometimes it is felt the victims are not newsworthy,” he added, while addressing the monthly Journalists for Justice media briefing in Nairobi.

“The press needs to look at the wider aspects of the case, give the victims a better hearing because they do not have the same kind of resources that can be applied by the defence to make them visible. At the bottom of a criminal trial, there are hundreds of thousands of people that have suffered harm and continue to suffer harm now going into 9 years after the 2007/2008 Kenya Post-Election Violence,” he added.

Read: We cannot speculate the outcome of the No-Case-to-answer matter in the Ruto and Sang cases, says Maria Kamara

 

What then for victims?

Nderitu explained that if the Trial Chamber rules that there is no case to answer, it would mean the form of assistance that might be advanced through the Trust Fund For Victims.

“The assistance would be minimal and perhaps not guaranteed. This is because reparations as opposed to assistance can only be ordered against a convicted person. There would be no reparations if there is no case to answer.”

However, he was of the opinion that under common law tradition, the no-case-to-answer decision would be appealable.

“But if there is a case to answer, the decision is not appealable, but others are of a different opinion,” says Nderitu.

“The interests of victims are not all about assistance. There are other things in the scenario for instance, the establishment of the truth and protection of the victims,” he added.

“Until the case is finally over, the victims would still have guaranteed rights to express their views and concerns as long as their personal interests are affected.”

 

 

He also urged the public not to engage in a conspiracy of silence but to keep on voicing the concerns of the victims.

“When victims continue to hurt and to experience harm and remain destitute, we must continue to shout out loud. We must not lose hope. What the ICC has done since the trial begun, that is what the Kenyan state has not done since 1992,” he affirmed.

AUDIO: Wilfred Nderitu on the implications of the recent (and forthcoming) ICC Decisions on victims participation

< >

Other Headlines


How I survived the LRA attack on the Pajule camp, by ICC witness

BY Journalists for Justice / ON 22 March 2017

New challenges for ICC on the horizon from the North as African threats to withdraw recede

BY Journalists for Justice / ON 22 March 2017

LRA soldiers cut up villager's body, cooked it and fed to his neighbours

BY Journalists for Justice / ON 21 March 2017

How attack on Pajule IDP camp was planned, by ICC witness

BY Journalists for Justice / ON 13 March 2017

Museveni brother’s name crops up a third time at Ongwen’s ICC trial

BY Journalists for Justice / ON 11 March 2017

Court hears details of last moments of LRA deputy leader Vincent Otti

BY Journalists for Justice / ON 09 March 2017

Fear and loathing at Dominic Ongwen’s ICC trial

BY A map of the Barlonyo massacre / ON 08 March 2017

South Africa revokes notice to withdraw from the ICC

BY Journalists for Justice / ON 09 March 2017

You failed us on truth report, violence victims tell Uhuru Kenyatta

BY Journalists for Justice / ON 01 March 2017

Revealed: How prosecutors fought to protect witnesses in Kenyatta case

BY JFJustice / ON 08 February 2017

There is no way Kenya was going to take the AU chair

BY Ambassador Amina Mohammed / ON 02 February 2017

Bensouda challenges UN security council to end impasse on Darfur

BY Journalists for Justice / ON 09 January 2017

JOIN US