English   |    French

  Wednesday PM

Replacing ICC in Africa still a bridge too far

Journalists for Justice / 20 July 2016

Even with the AU agreement to create a criminal chamber in the African Court of Justice and Human Rights, the attempt to replace the International Criminal Court on the continent remains a bridge too far.

In February 2016, Ghana, Sierra Leone and Sao Tome & Principle became the latest of eight African states to sign the agreement to create a chamber that would try at least 14 new crimes at the African Court of Justice and Human Rights.

 

 

 

The Protocol on amendments to the Statute of the African Court of Justice and Human Rights, also known as the Malabo Protocol – named after the city in which it was adopted in 2014, has so far been signed by Benin, Kenya, Congo, Guinea Bissau and Mauritania but it has not been ratified by any of the 54 states that make up the African Union.

For the amendment to come into force, the protocol has to be signed and ratified by at least 15 states. Adoption of the Malabo Protocol has run into headwinds because of perceived doublespeak at the African Union on tackling impunity. Although the proposed criminal chamber will be allowed to prosecute a wider scope of crimes than the ICC, concerns have been raised about the provisions for immunity against prosecution for heads of state and government. Important questions continue to be raised about the court’s capacity to deliver justice, considering that its earlier precursors – the African Court of Justice and the African Court of Human Rights – never took off because of resource challenges.

 The European Union has been quoted in an Amnesty International report, "Amnesty International: Report 2014/15 The State of The World’s Human Rights" as saying it will not fund the new court as long as it provides heads of state with immunity from prosecution.

Read: PROTOCOL ON AMENDMENTS TO THE PROTOCOL ON THE STATUTE OF THE AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

< >

Other Headlines


Replacing ICC in Africa still a bridge too far

Four crucial points for the future of the ICC

BY Journalists For Justice / ON 23 January 2018

Replacing ICC in Africa still a bridge too far

Kony ordered us to cut off Tabuley’s head and carry it to Sudan within four days, witness tells court

BY Journalists For Justice / ON 22 January 2018

Replacing ICC in Africa still a bridge too far

ICC state parties meeting adds use of biological weapons, undetectable X-ray fragments and laser weapons to list of War Crimes in Rome Statute

BY Journalists For Justice / ON 15 December 2017

Replacing ICC in Africa still a bridge too far

Book serialisation: Hopes, triumphs and failures at the ICC (Part 2)

BY Journalists For Justice / ON 11 December 2017

Replacing ICC in Africa still a bridge too far

Book serialisation: Hopes, triumphs and failures at the ICC

BY Journalists For Justice / ON 04 December 2017

Replacing ICC in Africa still a bridge too far

Ocampo speaks out on leaked emails

BY Journalists For Justice / ON 04 December 2017

Replacing ICC in Africa still a bridge too far

Journalists speak about challenges of reporting ICC trials

BY Journalists For Justice / ON 29 November 2017

Replacing ICC in Africa still a bridge too far

Mother of All Tribunals gears up for last trial judgment in historic Mladic case

BY Journalists For Justice / ON 29 November 2017

Replacing ICC in Africa still a bridge too far

Ntaganda’s defence witness testifies under court protection

BY Journalists For Justice / ON 29 November 2017

Replacing ICC in Africa still a bridge too far

ICC judges allow prosecutor to investigate crimes in Burundi

BY Journalists For Justice / ON 29 November 2017

Replacing ICC in Africa still a bridge too far

Glimmer of hope for Gbagbo as appeal judges order review of his detention

BY Susan Kendi / ON 21 July 2017

JOIN US