English   |    French

  Saturday PM

Revealed: How prosecutors fought to protect witnesses in Kenyatta case

JFJustice / 07 April 2017

How prosecutors fougt to protect witnesses in Kenyatta case

By Susan Kendi and Kwamchetsi Makokha

 

A trove of 20 documents published on the International Criminal Court’s website offers a rare peek into frantic efforts to protect 12 witnesses who would testify against Uhuru Kenyatta and Francis Muthaura.

Prosecutors fearing for the safety of the 12 witnesses had repeatedly applied for the court’s permission to hold back the names and identities of five witnesses from the accused’s lawyers until a month to the opening of the trial. They followed that with a request to withhold information in the statements of another seven witnesses from lawyers. A third application sought to hide the names of investigators interviewing witnesses.

In a public redacted version of the judges’ decisions, first published on February 3, 2017, Trial Chamber V(b) judges Kuniko Ozaki (presiding), Robert Fremr and Judge Geoffrey Henderson disclose how the prosecution was allowed to hold back from disclosing the identity of the witnesses to Kenyatta and Muthaura’s lawyers until the Victims and Witnesses Unit had put into place adequate protective measures.

Following the VWU’S report, the judges ruled that there was no point in continuing to withhold the identity of Witness P-232 from the defence lawyers beyond February 11, 2013 – a month before Kenyatta was elected as President of Kenya.

The applications and the decisions of the judges have remained unknown since they were confidential, with only the ICC’s Victims and Witnesses Unit being notified in one instance.

Prosecutors had argued that the nature of the four witnesses’ evidence was “unique” and had substantial incriminatory value, and that there was some “powerful incentive” to interfere with these witnesses.

Secondly, it was feared that there might be a risk of witness tampering. The prosecution alleged that during the Pre-Trial stage of the case, intermediaries allegedly acting on behalf of Kenyatta targeted witnesses exhorting them to rescind their testimony and decline to testify.

Prosecutors also said that shortly after the confidential disclosure of the identities of Witness 11 and 12 to Kenyatta and Muthaura’s lawyers, witnesses were contacted and offered a deal not to testify.

Defence lawyers opposed the requests and wanted all witnesses and their statements revealed. They argued that the delayed disclosure of possibly 12 out of 35 prosecution witnesses was unmanageable and unreasonable. For good measure, Muthaura’s lawyers also applied to have one of their witness placed under the ICC’s protection programme.

Prosecutors alleged that three of the insider witnesses whose names had already been disclosed confidentially to the Defence had been interfered with in. During the pre-trial stage [a witness] “was the target of a pre-disclosure bribery campaign by intermediaries purportedly acting on behalf of the Accused, which aimed to persuade the witness to withdraw his testimony regarding the PEV and to agree not to testify for the Prosecution.”

The Prosecution also claimed that a number of leaks of confidential information have occurred in this case so far. They argued that disclosing the redacted transcripts would provide Kenyatta and Muthaura’s lawyers with enormous information of the witnesses’ accounts.

ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda withdrew charges against Muthaura in March 2013, and was forced to make a similar withdrawal of charges against Kenyatta in December 2014 after failing to muster sufficient evidence to proceed to trial following a spate of witness withdrawals and recantations.

 

 

< >

Other Headlines


Revealed: How prosecutors fought to protect witnesses in Kenyatta case

Police Protection Needed for Judiciary

BY Journalists For Justice / ON 20 September 2017

Revealed: How prosecutors fought to protect witnesses in Kenyatta case

How Kony used spirit possession to bind fighters to LRA

BY Journalists for Justice / ON 19 September 2017

Revealed: How prosecutors fought to protect witnesses in Kenyatta case

First guide on how victims can participate at international courts

BY Journalists for Justice / ON 18 September 2017

Revealed: How prosecutors fought to protect witnesses in Kenyatta case

The ICC urged to investigate crimes committed in Burundi

BY Journalists For Justice / ON 07 September 2017

Revealed: How prosecutors fought to protect witnesses in Kenyatta case

Kenyan authorities urged to investigate police use of excessive force

BY Journalists For Justice / ON 28 August 2017

Revealed: How prosecutors fought to protect witnesses in Kenyatta case

Glimmer of hope for Gbagbo as appeal judges order review of his detention

BY Susan Kendi / ON 21 July 2017

Revealed: How prosecutors fought to protect witnesses in Kenyatta case

Kenya: Rift Valley Violence Threatens Voting

BY Journalists for Justice / ON 19 July 2017

Revealed: How prosecutors fought to protect witnesses in Kenyatta case

Top ICC political team recommends South Korean Kwon for ASP boss

BY Journalists for Justice / ON 07 July 2017

Revealed: How prosecutors fought to protect witnesses in Kenyatta case

South Africa gets a slap on the wrist for failure to arrest Bashir

BY Journalists for Justice / ON 06 July 2017

Revealed: How prosecutors fought to protect witnesses in Kenyatta case

Diplomatic row over possible second term for Kaba as president of ICC states

BY Journalists for Justice / ON 03 July 2017

Revealed: How prosecutors fought to protect witnesses in Kenyatta case

ICC judges’ visit to Auschwitz not without controversy

BY Journalists for Justice / ON 28 June 2017

Revealed: How prosecutors fought to protect witnesses in Kenyatta case

ICC judges pay their respects to victims of Auschwitz

BY Journalists for Justice / ON 28 June 2017

Revealed: How prosecutors fought to protect witnesses in Kenyatta case

Looking Uhuru Kenyatta’s IDP gift horse in the mouth

BY Journalists for Justice / ON 28 June 2017

Revealed: How prosecutors fought to protect witnesses in Kenyatta case

UN puts British colonialism In Africa before Hague world court

BY Journalists for Justice / ON 28 June 2017

Revealed: How prosecutors fought to protect witnesses in Kenyatta case

Ntaganda takes the stand in his own defence at the ICC

BY Susan Kendi / ON 27 June 2017

Revealed: How prosecutors fought to protect witnesses in Kenyatta case

Human rights violations persist in a climate of widespread fear in Burundi

BY Susan Kendi / ON 27 June 2017

Revealed: How prosecutors fought to protect witnesses in Kenyatta case

Thousands of post-election violence rapists went scot-free in Kenya

BY Editor / ON 02 May 2017

 Would this money be part of the Sh6 billion set aside for the Internally Displaced Persons integrated into various communities at the time of the conflict in Kenya? If the answer is in the affirmative, the President’s action would not only be a violation of a High Court order, but it would also seem to be using the money as a bribe to voters ahead of the August 8 elections.


Read More

-->