• About US
  • Our Work
Friday, June 20, 2025
  • Login
Journalists For Justice (JFJ)
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists For Justice (JFJ)
No Result
View All Result

Ntaganda handed 30-year prison sentence at ICC

byJournalists For Justice
November 8, 2019
in Africa Cases, Bosco Ntaganda, ICC Cases
Reading Time: 4 mins read
27
A A
Bosco Ntaganda

Bosco Ntaganda

9
SHARES
98
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Whatsapp

On Thursday, International Criminal Court (ICC) judges handed down the highest penalty ever given by the court when they announced a 30-year prison sentence for former Congolese rebel commander Bosco Ntaganda.

The 45-year-old Ntaganda has spent six and a half years in ICC detention, which will be deducted from the years that he will serve. The former chief of general staff of the Patriotic Forces for the Liberation of Congo (FPLC) surrendered to the court in March 2013, seven years after the initial warrant for his arrest had been issued.

The highest sentences for individual crimes were for murder and attempted murder (30 years) and persecution (30 years). Others were rape of civilians (28 years); conscripting, enlisting, and using children in armed conflict (18 years); rape of female child soldiers (17 years); destroying the adversary’s property (15 years); sexual slavery of female child soldiers (14 years); and intentionally directing attacks against civilians (14 years).

Delivering the sentence, Judge Robert Fremr (presiding) noted that when a person has been convicted of more than one crime, the total period of imprisonment shall not be less than the highest individual sentence pronounced. Accordingly, Ntaganda would serve 30 years in prison. Judge Fremr added that the chamber had determined that although Ntaganda’s crimes were of high gravity, they did not warrant a sentence of life in prison as suggested by a lawyer for victims.

RelatedPosts

Dilemma of ICC-wanted Netanyahu’s visit high on the agenda of new leadership in Germany

Impunity continues to rob Sudanese victims of peace and justice

Rodrigo Duterte arrest heralds hope for justice for Philippines’ victims of ‘war on drugs’

Article 77 of the Rome Statute provides for imprisonment for a period not exceeding 30 years, or life imprisonment when justified by the extreme gravity of the crime and the individual circumstances of the convicted person. In addition, judges can issue a fine or order forfeiture of proceeds, property, and assets derived from a convicted person’s crime.  Judges determined that a fine was not appropriate because Ntaganda is insolvent.

Former FPLC commander-in-chief Thomas Lubanga is currently serving a 14-year prison sentence, the longest penalty previously issued by the ICC. Another former Congolese militia leader, German Katanga, was sentenced to 12 years, while Malian militant Ahmed Al Faqi Al Mahdi is serving a nine-year jail term.

Ntaganda was convicted over crimes committed during an internal armed conflict in the Ituri region of eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) in 2002 and 2003. Trial Chamber VI, which is composed of judges Fremr, Kuniko Ozaki, and Chang-ho Chung, noted in Thursday’s ruling that Ntaganda bore high culpability, as he gave orders to commit crimes and personally engaged in violent conduct. The judges recalled that he was convicted of the murder of at least 74 individuals, including as a direct perpetrator in the killing of a priest.

According to the sentencing judgment, Ntaganda and fellow perpetrators had a plan to drive out members of the Lendu ethnic community from certain localities of Ituri, to kill civilians, steal their property, and subject them to rape and sexual slavery.

Ntaganda was convicted, among others, for sexual slavery and rape, including of child soldiers who served within the FPLC. The sentencing judgment notes that civilian victims of rape and sexual slavery suffered physical, psychological, psychiatric, and social consequences, such as ostracization, stigmatization, and social rejection, both in the immediate and longer term.

Describing the gravity of these crimes and their long-lasting impact, the judgment added that two FPLC child soldiers were raped multiple times by multiple soldiers over the period of their sexual enslavement. They similarly suffered physical and psychological consequences, including sexually-transmitted diseases and unwanted pregnancies.

Following today’s decision, Ntaganda and the prosecutor can appeal the sentence on the ground of disproportion between the crimes and the sentence. Ntaganda’s lawyers are already appealing his conviction last July. Defense lawyers allege procedural errors and violations of Ntaganda’s fair trial rights and claim trial judges reached various erroneous findings in the conviction decision.

On July 8, 2019, Ntaganda was found guilty on all 13 counts of war crimes and all five counts of crimes against humanity he was tried for. He was convicted of three crimes as a direct perpetrator: murder as a crime against humanity and a war crime and persecution as a crime against humanity. He was found responsible as an indirect perpetrator for all other crimes charged.

Below are the individual sentences handed down today:

  • Murder and attempted murder as a crime against humanity and as a war crime: 30 years;
  • Intentionally directing attacks against civilians as a war crime: 14 years;
  • Rape of civilians as a crime against humanity and as a war crime: 28 years;
  • Rape of children under the age of 15 incorporated into the UPC/FPLC as a war crime: 17 years;
  • Sexual slavery of civilians as a crime against humanity and as a war crime: 12 years;
  • Sexual slavery of children under the age of 15 incorporated into the UPC/FPLC as a war crime: 14 years;
  • Persecution as a crime against humanity: 30 years of imprisonment;
  • Pillage as a war crime: 12 years;
  • Forcible transfer of the civilian population as a crime against humanity: 10 years;
  • Ordering the displacement of the civilian population as a war crime: 8 years;
  • Conscripting and enlisting children under the age of 15 years into an armed group and using them to participate actively in hostilities as a war crime: 18 years;
  • Intentionally directing attacks against protected objects as a war crime: 10 years; and
  • Destroying the adversary’s property as a war crime: 15 years.

Ntaganda has 30 days to file an appeal against the sentencing judgment.

This was first published in the International Justice Monitor

Share4Tweet2Send
Previous Post

Former social worker testifies about a reception center for Former LRA abductees

Next Post

Libya remains a priority situation for the office of the prosecutor says Bensouda

Next Post
Libya remains a priority situation for the office of the prosecutor says Bensouda

Libya remains a priority situation for the office of the prosecutor says Bensouda

Please login to join discussion

Recent Posts

  • Freedom and human rights under siege in Africa amid rising repression
  • International lenders called out on ballooning debt and corruption in poor countries
  • Karim Khan’s Accusations of Misconduct: A Timeline of Key Events
  • Karim Khan’s exit deals another blow to the troubled ICC
  • Proposed war crimes court holds hope for justice and accountability in Liberia

About

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Twitter Facebook Instagram LinkedIn

Archives by Month:

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.