• About US
  • Our Work
Monday, June 2, 2025
  • Login
Journalists For Justice (JFJ)
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists For Justice (JFJ)
No Result
View All Result

Bensouda concludes her Prosecution case in Ruto and Sang trials

byJournalists for Justice
September 10, 2015
in The ICC
Reading Time: 2 mins read
16
A A
5
SHARES
56
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Whatsapp

RelatedPosts

Karim Khan’s exit deals another blow to the troubled ICC

Dilemma of ICC-wanted Netanyahu’s visit high on the agenda of new leadership in Germany

ICC issues landmark policy to tackle slavery crimes

Fatou Bensouda, the Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court has formally notified the Trial Chamber V(A) of the conclusion of the prosecution case in the William Ruto and Joshua Sang Case.   “In compliance with the Trial Chamber’s order ICC-01/09-01/11-1948-Conf, the prosecution hereby notifies the Trial Chamber, parties and participants that it formally closes the prosecution’s case,” ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda stated on her application to the court.  

  Her notification comes after the Trial Chamber judges by majority, granted the Prosecution’s Request to use into evidence the prior recorded testimony of a number of witnesses pursuant to Rule 68(2) (c) and (d) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, without prejudice to the weight, if any, which will be attached to them in the Chamber’s weighing of the evidence.    However, the Trial Chamber on Thursday allowed Deputy President William Ruto and journalist Joshua arap Sang to appeal the decision that allowed the use statements of recanting witnesses.   Ruto and Sang are from this stage expected to orally request for a motion of a no-case-to-answer before making written applications after closure of the prosecution’s case. Decision No. 5 on the Conduct of Trial Proceedings (Principles and Procedure on ‘No Case to Answer’ Motions).    Ruto and Sang have been on trial since September 2013. They each face three counts of crimes against humanity for their alleged roles in the violence that erupted in Kenya after the December 2007 presidential election.

Share2Tweet1Send
Previous Post

Case of victim of mistaken identity during “War on Terror” begins before the Kenyan High Court

Next Post

I want to be told the truth for mistaken identity, Kamilya tells court

Next Post

I want to be told the truth for mistaken identity, Kamilya tells court

Please login to join discussion

Recent Posts

  • Karim Khan’s exit deals another blow to the troubled ICC
  • Proposed war crimes court holds hope for justice and accountability in Liberia
  • Dilemma of ICC-wanted Netanyahu’s visit high on the agenda of new leadership in Germany
  • Michael Correa’s US conviction brings into sharp focus the slow pace of transitional justice in The Gambia
  • Genocide marks 31 years and the clock is ticking for six Rwandans held in Niger

About

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Twitter Facebook Instagram LinkedIn

Archives by Month:

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.