• About US
  • Our Work
Friday, August 8, 2025
  • Login
Journalists For Justice (JFJ)
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists For Justice (JFJ)
No Result
View All Result

Bensouda concludes her Prosecution case in Ruto and Sang trials

byJournalists for Justice
September 10, 2015
in The ICC
Reading Time: 2 mins read
18
A A
5
SHARES
61
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Whatsapp

RelatedPosts

Justice for CAR victims as ICC sends two militia leaders to prison for brutal crimes

Karim Khan’s Accusations of Misconduct: A Timeline of Key Events

Karim Khan’s exit deals another blow to the troubled ICC

Fatou Bensouda, the Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court has formally notified the Trial Chamber V(A) of the conclusion of the prosecution case in the William Ruto and Joshua Sang Case.   “In compliance with the Trial Chamber’s order ICC-01/09-01/11-1948-Conf, the prosecution hereby notifies the Trial Chamber, parties and participants that it formally closes the prosecution’s case,” ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda stated on her application to the court.  

  Her notification comes after the Trial Chamber judges by majority, granted the Prosecution’s Request to use into evidence the prior recorded testimony of a number of witnesses pursuant to Rule 68(2) (c) and (d) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, without prejudice to the weight, if any, which will be attached to them in the Chamber’s weighing of the evidence.    However, the Trial Chamber on Thursday allowed Deputy President William Ruto and journalist Joshua arap Sang to appeal the decision that allowed the use statements of recanting witnesses.   Ruto and Sang are from this stage expected to orally request for a motion of a no-case-to-answer before making written applications after closure of the prosecution’s case. Decision No. 5 on the Conduct of Trial Proceedings (Principles and Procedure on ‘No Case to Answer’ Motions).    Ruto and Sang have been on trial since September 2013. They each face three counts of crimes against humanity for their alleged roles in the violence that erupted in Kenya after the December 2007 presidential election.

Share2Tweet1Send
Previous Post

Case of victim of mistaken identity during “War on Terror” begins before the Kenyan High Court

Next Post

I want to be told the truth for mistaken identity, Kamilya tells court

Next Post

I want to be told the truth for mistaken identity, Kamilya tells court

Please login to join discussion

Recent Posts

  • Elusive Sanna Manjang continues to rob Gambian victims of hope for justice
  • Justice for CAR victims as ICC sends two militia leaders to prison for brutal crimes
  • ICJ’s groundbreaking advisory opinion brings new hope to victims of climate change disasters
  • Peace efforts without justice for victims will not stop future conflict in DRC
  • Deadly duty: Journalists pay a high price as attacks on the media shoot up

About

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Twitter Facebook Instagram LinkedIn

Archives by Month:

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.