Resources
Wednesday, May 18, 2022
  • Login
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result

Browse by Topic:

  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result
Home The ICC

Fear and loathing at Dominic Ongwena’s ICC trial

Journalists For JusticebyJournalists For Justice
September 3, 2017
in The ICC
Reading Time: 17 mins read
A A
0
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

 By Susan Kendi

Fear looms large over witnesses testifying at the ongoing trial of former Lord’s Resistance commander Dominic Ongwen at the International Criminal Court.

Of the seven prosecution witnesses who have so far taken the stand, it is only London School of Economics anthropology professor Tim Allen whose identity has not been concealed. The subsequent six witnesses have been allocated a pseudonym (P-403, P-016, P-059, P-440, P-003 and currently P-205) and testified under court protection mechanisms such as voice and face distortion.

Prof Allen, who was called as an expert witness, laid a foundation for the case by outlining the history of Uganda and explained the role that spiritual forces played in the LRA conflict. Allen lived in Uganda in the 1980s while researching the LRA as it sprung up.

Additionally, the frequency with which the court has had to go into private sessions has been increasing steadily, with testimony in closed sessions sometimes going on for almost to an hour due to the sensitivity of LRA issues. Once in open court, witnesses have expressed fears of arrest or being harmed.

RelatedStories

Gicheru asks ICC judge to admit new evidence

Abd-Al-Rahman paid Janjaweed, witness tells judges

Gicheru opposes prosecution bid to introduce ‘fresh’ evidence

Witness P-205, who has been on the stand all week, has been assigned a legal advisor to guide him on parts of the testimony that might be self-incriminating. His ranks and responsibilities in the LRA have been concealed, and lawyer Sarah Kerwegi is helping him to work through conditions under which he may reveal self-incriminating evidence, on the understanding that such information will not be revealed to the public.

He is a former LRA commander who, according to the prosecution’s Pre-trial Brief, was at some point in the Gilva Brigade of as well as in the Terwanga Battalion of the Sinia Brigade. He was at some point an acting commander of the Terwanga Battalion.

Prosecutors presented the witness with agreements he had signed with them before trial began.

“The second RV [rendezvous] was before the Barlonyo attack … When battalions went to the mission, the authorization given (by Ongwen), was to go and work, meaning there was an objective they wanted to carry out,” Witness P-205 told the told Trial Chamber IX on March 6.

The two objectives discussed in rendezvous were abductions and fighting. Dominic Ongwen, who is facing 70 charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity, allegedly instructed the battalions abduct anyone who could participate in the army and keep walking. No date was given to the battalions on when an attack was to be conducted unless Ongwen sent out a report.

The witness spoke about other attacks that Ongwen allegedly had led in northern Uganda, specifically on Lalia, Ngora and Patongo.

Witness P-205 told the Court that at one point Ongwen ordered him and other LRA soldiers to attack a military camp at Opit.

He spoke about the RV’s and meetings that LRA bosses had, especially the ones in which Ongwen was a participant, and of the abductions, weapons and food they seized during various attacks.

He confirmed that he met Dominic Ongwen at RV after he had come from the attack on Lalia, saying he had seen the abductees. The youngest boy was around 12 years old. The boys and girls Ongwen came with were handed over to Tabulang, a commander, who picked some and handed the rest back to Ongwen.

Testifying specifically about the attack on Odek, one of the camps for internally displaced persons for which Ongwen is charged, the witness said: “He (Ongwen) asked the soldiers from Terwanga Battalion for about six soldiers and all the officers. They were 10 people that is in addition to the soldiers he has in his brigade, and sent them to Odek, “witness P-205.

The Odek attack led to the displacement of thousands of people in northern Uganda.

Ongwen, he added, was the overall commander at Odek, though the commander who attacked the centre was Tabulang.

Ongwen is alleged to have commanded the Sinia Brigade, one of LRA’s four brigades.

Witness P-205 told the court that before Ongwen ordered the attack on Odek, he addressed the selected soldiers, some from Terwanga Battalion, and told them that there were few soldiers in Odek and they should leave nothing in Odek.

Ongwen gave orders that if the LRA soldiers found good girls and boys, they should abduct them. Those not fit for the army, above 18 years of age, should be killed, the witness told the Court.

The witness said it took a day for the RV’s to walk from where they were to Odek. 

He said the soldiers left in the locations couldn’t hear the gunshots since the terrain was sloping but for heavy booming gunfire could still be heard.

“In the Odek attack, they overran the barracks but most people escaped. They (the LRA fighters) carried some food items and weapons, I witnessed.”

After the attack they went to report back to Ongwen and then proceeded to Terwanga.

Some of the Terwanga officers and soldiers assigned to the Odek operation included: Nyero, Chanawira, Labanya, Ogwar, Okello Patrick, and Ojwak Oite, among others.

Ongwen reported about the Lukodi Camp attack to his bosses, and talked about it at the rendezvous meeting, which was also attended by Ongwen’s wives. Weapons were seized, the witness said. “After the RV with Abudema, when people were going to Teso that’s when I met Tabulang, in Teso. At the time, he had been promoted to division commander and needed soldiers. They took soldiers from Sinia Brigade. We were walking in teams, Otti Vincent picked Ongwen to go into control and we met at RV. I saw this with my eyes ….. Ongwen was moving in the same convoy with Otti Vincent.”

Questioned by prosecutor Pubudu Sachithanandan on the death of Tabulang and the commanders who took over various positions in the LRA, he said: “Tabulang is deceased. He died at the end of October 2003.” He also revealed the commanders who took charge of the LRA battalions after Tabulang’s death.

The commander of, during Tabulang death was Olum Ichaya commanded the Nawanga Battalion, Ocan George Laboingo the of Siba Battalion and Ongwen the Oka Battalion.

Commander Box succeeded Tabulang, and Odomi (Dominic Ongwen) became Sinia Brigade commander.

The witness said he was Kaberamaido with Okum Luchaya after Tabulang’s death.

His testimony continues before Trial Chamber IX with Justice Bertram Schmitt presiding and Judges Peter Kovacs and Raul Pangalangan.

 By Susan Kendi

Fear looms large over witnesses testifying at the ongoing trial of former Lord’s Resistance commander Dominic Ongwen at the International Criminal Court.

Of the seven prosecution witnesses who have so far taken the stand, it is only London School of Economics anthropology professor Tim Allen whose identity has not been concealed. The subsequent six witnesses have been allocated a pseudonym (P-403, P-016, P-059, P-440, P-003 and currently P-205) and testified under court protection mechanisms such as voice and face distortion.

Prof Allen, who was called as an expert witness, laid a foundation for the case by outlining the history of Uganda and explained the role that spiritual forces played in the LRA conflict. Allen lived in Uganda in the 1980s while researching the LRA as it sprung up.

Additionally, the frequency with which the court has had to go into private sessions has been increasing steadily, with testimony in closed sessions sometimes going on for almost to an hour due to the sensitivity of LRA issues. Once in open court, witnesses have expressed fears of arrest or being harmed.

Witness P-205, who has been on the stand all week, has been assigned a legal advisor to guide him on parts of the testimony that might be self-incriminating. His ranks and responsibilities in the LRA have been concealed, and lawyer Sarah Kerwegi is helping him to work through conditions under which he may reveal self-incriminating evidence, on the understanding that such information will not be revealed to the public.

He is a former LRA commander who, according to the prosecution’s Pre-trial Brief, was at some point in the Gilva Brigade of as well as in the Terwanga Battalion of the Sinia Brigade. He was at some point an acting commander of the Terwanga Battalion.

Prosecutors presented the witness with agreements he had signed with them before trial began.

“The second RV [rendezvous] was before the Barlonyo attack … When battalions went to the mission, the authorization given (by Ongwen), was to go and work, meaning there was an objective they wanted to carry out,” Witness P-205 told the told Trial Chamber IX on March 6.

The two objectives discussed in rendezvous were abductions and fighting. Dominic Ongwen, who is facing 70 charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity, allegedly instructed the battalions abduct anyone who could participate in the army and keep walking. No date was given to the battalions on when an attack was to be conducted unless Ongwen sent out a report.

The witness spoke about other attacks that Ongwen allegedly had led in northern Uganda, specifically on Lalia, Ngora and Patongo.

Witness P-205 told the Court that at one point Ongwen ordered him and other LRA soldiers to attack a military camp at Opit.

He spoke about the RV’s and meetings that LRA bosses had, especially the ones in which Ongwen was a participant, and of the abductions, weapons and food they seized during various attacks.

He confirmed that he met Dominic Ongwen at RV after he had come from the attack on Lalia, saying he had seen the abductees. The youngest boy was around 12 years old. The boys and girls Ongwen came with were handed over to Tabulang, a commander, who picked some and handed the rest back to Ongwen.

Testifying specifically about the attack on Odek, one of the camps for internally displaced persons for which Ongwen is charged, the witness said: “He (Ongwen) asked the soldiers from Terwanga Battalion for about six soldiers and all the officers. They were 10 people that is in addition to the soldiers he has in his brigade, and sent them to Odek, “witness P-205.

The Odek attack led to the displacement of thousands of people in northern Uganda.

Ongwen, he added, was the overall commander at Odek, though the commander who attacked the centre was Tabulang.

Ongwen is alleged to have commanded the Sinia Brigade, one of LRA’s four brigades.

Witness P-205 told the court that before Ongwen ordered the attack on Odek, he addressed the selected soldiers, some from Terwanga Battalion, and told them that there were few soldiers in Odek and they should leave nothing in Odek.

Ongwen gave orders that if the LRA soldiers found good girls and boys, they should abduct them. Those not fit for the army, above 18 years of age, should be killed, the witness told the Court.

The witness said it took a day for the RV’s to walk from where they were to Odek. 

He said the soldiers left in the locations couldn’t hear the gunshots since the terrain was sloping but for heavy booming gunfire could still be heard.

“In the Odek attack, they overran the barracks but most people escaped. They (the LRA fighters) carried some food items and weapons, I witnessed.”

After the attack they went to report back to Ongwen and then proceeded to Terwanga.

Some of the Terwanga officers and soldiers assigned to the Odek operation included: Nyero, Chanawira, Labanya, Ogwar, Okello Patrick, and Ojwak Oite, among others.

Ongwen reported about the Lukodi Camp attack to his bosses, and talked about it at the rendezvous meeting, which was also attended by Ongwen’s wives. Weapons were seized, the witness said. “After the RV with Abudema, when people were going to Teso that’s when I met Tabulang, in Teso. At the time, he had been promoted to division commander and needed soldiers. They took soldiers from Sinia Brigade. We were walking in teams, Otti Vincent picked Ongwen to go into control and we met at RV. I saw this with my eyes ….. Ongwen was moving in the same convoy with Otti Vincent.”

Questioned by prosecutor Pubudu Sachithanandan on the death of Tabulang and the commanders who took over various positions in the LRA, he said: “Tabulang is deceased. He died at the end of October 2003.” He also revealed the commanders who took charge of the LRA battalions after Tabulang’s death.

The commander of, during Tabulang death was Olum Ichaya commanded the Nawanga Battalion, Ocan George Laboingo the of Siba Battalion and Ongwen the Oka Battalion.

Commander Box succeeded Tabulang, and Odomi (Dominic Ongwen) became Sinia Brigade commander.

The witness said he was Kaberamaido with Okum Luchaya after Tabulang’s death.

His testimony continues before Trial Chamber IX with Justice Bertram Schmitt presiding and Judges Peter Kovacs and Raul Pangalangan.

 By Susan Kendi

Fear looms large over witnesses testifying at the ongoing trial of former Lord’s Resistance commander Dominic Ongwen at the International Criminal Court.

Of the seven prosecution witnesses who have so far taken the stand, it is only London School of Economics anthropology professor Tim Allen whose identity has not been concealed. The subsequent six witnesses have been allocated a pseudonym (P-403, P-016, P-059, P-440, P-003 and currently P-205) and testified under court protection mechanisms such as voice and face distortion.

Prof Allen, who was called as an expert witness, laid a foundation for the case by outlining the history of Uganda and explained the role that spiritual forces played in the LRA conflict. Allen lived in Uganda in the 1980s while researching the LRA as it sprung up.

Additionally, the frequency with which the court has had to go into private sessions has been increasing steadily, with testimony in closed sessions sometimes going on for almost to an hour due to the sensitivity of LRA issues. Once in open court, witnesses have expressed fears of arrest or being harmed.

Witness P-205, who has been on the stand all week, has been assigned a legal advisor to guide him on parts of the testimony that might be self-incriminating. His ranks and responsibilities in the LRA have been concealed, and lawyer Sarah Kerwegi is helping him to work through conditions under which he may reveal self-incriminating evidence, on the understanding that such information will not be revealed to the public.

He is a former LRA commander who, according to the prosecution’s Pre-trial Brief, was at some point in the Gilva Brigade of as well as in the Terwanga Battalion of the Sinia Brigade. He was at some point an acting commander of the Terwanga Battalion.

Prosecutors presented the witness with agreements he had signed with them before trial began.

“The second RV [rendezvous] was before the Barlonyo attack … When battalions went to the mission, the authorization given (by Ongwen), was to go and work, meaning there was an objective they wanted to carry out,” Witness P-205 told the told Trial Chamber IX on March 6.

The two objectives discussed in rendezvous were abductions and fighting. Dominic Ongwen, who is facing 70 charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity, allegedly instructed the battalions abduct anyone who could participate in the army and keep walking. No date was given to the battalions on when an attack was to be conducted unless Ongwen sent out a report.

The witness spoke about other attacks that Ongwen allegedly had led in northern Uganda, specifically on Lalia, Ngora and Patongo.

Witness P-205 told the Court that at one point Ongwen ordered him and other LRA soldiers to attack a military camp at Opit.

He spoke about the RV’s and meetings that LRA bosses had, especially the ones in which Ongwen was a participant, and of the abductions, weapons and food they seized during various attacks.

He confirmed that he met Dominic Ongwen at RV after he had come from the attack on Lalia, saying he had seen the abductees. The youngest boy was around 12 years old. The boys and girls Ongwen came with were handed over to Tabulang, a commander, who picked some and handed the rest back to Ongwen.

Testifying specifically about the attack on Odek, one of the camps for internally displaced persons for which Ongwen is charged, the witness said: “He (Ongwen) asked the soldiers from Terwanga Battalion for about six soldiers and all the officers. They were 10 people that is in addition to the soldiers he has in his brigade, and sent them to Odek, “witness P-205.

The Odek attack led to the displacement of thousands of people in northern Uganda.

Ongwen, he added, was the overall commander at Odek, though the commander who attacked the centre was Tabulang.

Ongwen is alleged to have commanded the Sinia Brigade, one of LRA’s four brigades.

Witness P-205 told the court that before Ongwen ordered the attack on Odek, he addressed the selected soldiers, some from Terwanga Battalion, and told them that there were few soldiers in Odek and they should leave nothing in Odek.

Ongwen gave orders that if the LRA soldiers found good girls and boys, they should abduct them. Those not fit for the army, above 18 years of age, should be killed, the witness told the Court.

The witness said it took a day for the RV’s to walk from where they were to Odek. 

He said the soldiers left in the locations couldn’t hear the gunshots since the terrain was sloping but for heavy booming gunfire could still be heard.

“In the Odek attack, they overran the barracks but most people escaped. They (the LRA fighters) carried some food items and weapons, I witnessed.”

After the attack they went to report back to Ongwen and then proceeded to Terwanga.

Some of the Terwanga officers and soldiers assigned to the Odek operation included: Nyero, Chanawira, Labanya, Ogwar, Okello Patrick, and Ojwak Oite, among others.

Ongwen reported about the Lukodi Camp attack to his bosses, and talked about it at the rendezvous meeting, which was also attended by Ongwen’s wives. Weapons were seized, the witness said. “After the RV with Abudema, when people were going to Teso that’s when I met Tabulang, in Teso. At the time, he had been promoted to division commander and needed soldiers. They took soldiers from Sinia Brigade. We were walking in teams, Otti Vincent picked Ongwen to go into control and we met at RV. I saw this with my eyes ….. Ongwen was moving in the same convoy with Otti Vincent.”

Questioned by prosecutor Pubudu Sachithanandan on the death of Tabulang and the commanders who took over various positions in the LRA, he said: “Tabulang is deceased. He died at the end of October 2003.” He also revealed the commanders who took charge of the LRA battalions after Tabulang’s death.

The commander of, during Tabulang death was Olum Ichaya commanded the Nawanga Battalion, Ocan George Laboingo the of Siba Battalion and Ongwen the Oka Battalion.

Commander Box succeeded Tabulang, and Odomi (Dominic Ongwen) became Sinia Brigade commander.

The witness said he was Kaberamaido with Okum Luchaya after Tabulang’s death.

His testimony continues before Trial Chamber IX with Justice Bertram Schmitt presiding and Judges Peter Kovacs and Raul Pangalangan.

Previous Post

South Africa revokes notice to withdraw from the ICC

Next Post

Court hears details of last moments of LRA deputy leader Vincent Otti

Journalists For Justice

Journalists For Justice

Related Posts

Michael G. Karnavas, the lead counsel of Kenyan lawyer Paul Gicheru, during the opening of his trial at the International Criminal Court. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Gicheru asks ICC judge to admit new evidence

May 3, 2022
Cyril Laucci, the lead counsel of former Janjaweed commander Ali-Abd-Al-Rahman, during the opening of his trial at the International Criminal Court. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Abd-Al-Rahman paid Janjaweed, witness tells judges

April 27, 2022
Judge Miatta Maria Samba of the International Criminal Court’s Trial Chamber III during the opening of the case of the Prosecutor v Paul Gicheru on February 15, 2022. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Gicheru opposes prosecution bid to introduce ‘fresh’ evidence

April 15, 2022
Former Central African Republic rebel leader Maxime Jeoffroy Eli Mokom Gawaka arrives at the International Criminal Court in The Hague on March 22, 2022 for his first appearance. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Khan wants Mokom to have access to Yekatom-Ngaïssona trial materials

April 13, 2022
Ali Muhammad Ali Abd-Al-Rahman during the opening of his trial at the International Criminal Court in The Hague on Tuesday, April 5, 2022. He faces 31 counts of crimes against humanity and war crimes allegedly committed in Sudan's Darfur region two decades ago. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

First Darfur case opens at the ICC

April 7, 2022
Kenyan lawyer Paul Gicheru during his trial at the International Criminal Court. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Gicheru’s lawyers weigh their options in next stage of ICC case

March 30, 2022
Next Post

Court hears details of last moments of LRA deputy leader Vincent Otti

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • Hope at last for Kenyan victims, but is TFV’s planned support enough?
  • Gicheru asks ICC judge to admit new evidence
  • Abd-Al-Rahman paid Janjaweed, witness tells judges
  • Gicheru opposes prosecution bid to introduce ‘fresh’ evidence
  • Khan wants Mokom to have access to Yekatom-Ngaïssona trial materials

Recent Comments

  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Kenyan lawyer denies bribery charges at the ICC
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on You did me wrong, Bemba tells ICC as he demands 70 million euros
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Two victims’ lawyers in Kenyatta case in line to become next ICC prosecutor
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Profiles of the four people shortlisted for the job of ICC Prosecutor
  • Write My Essay on Afghanistan case fails to take off at the ICC — pragmatism’ or surrender to the powerful?

Archives

Categories

JFJ – Journalists for Justice

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Browse by Topics:

Archives by Month:

Never Again
INTAHE
BarometreVerite
The Victims' Bantaba
No Result
View All Result
  • Confronting Impunity
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Login

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz