Resources
Wednesday, May 18, 2022
  • Login
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result

Browse by Topic:

  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result
Home The ICC

Former LRA soldiers haunted by fear of prosecution, witness tells ICC

Journalists For JusticebyJournalists For Justice
January 27, 2017
in The ICC
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
0
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By Susan Kendi

Soldiers fleeing the Lord’s Resistance Army would receive a blanket, a hoe, a machete, two saucepans and 265,000 Uganda Shillings ($73).

On top of that, they would receive an Amnesty Certificate and a form in which they would fill their personal information and where they had been, a witness told judges at the International Criminal Court on January 26, 2016. Amnesty certificates were used as proof that a defector was no longer an LRA fighter, he added.

“I do not know if I am going to be prosecuted. I don’t know if [the] amnesty certificate [protects] me from prosecution but if they prosecute me in future, what right do I have not to come to court?” Witness P-016 told lawyer Kryspus Odongo, who is representing former LRA commander Dominic Ongwen at the ICC.

The witness, who is was testifying under a protected identity with voice distortion and face pixilation to give him anonymity, revealed that he was sent to the frontline but was shot, ironically giving him an edge for selection as a signaler.

RelatedStories

Gicheru asks ICC judge to admit new evidence

Abd-Al-Rahman paid Janjaweed, witness tells judges

Gicheru opposes prosecution bid to introduce ‘fresh’ evidence

“We were trained on the TONFAS Code, assigned to different commanders and [we then] trained the rest of the LRA soldiers on how to use a radio,” he said.

The signalers’ training entailed how to configure messages using the TONFAS code to ensure confidentiality and interception but technical aspects of radio communication were not taught.

The prosecution witness said it was difficult to recognise voices in recordings when one was speaking in undertones or against background noise but after listening, you can easily identify the voice of the person speaking. He said had met Ongwen past puberty, when both their voices had broken: “I was no longer 12 years old; I was 18 years and hence our voices had changed. I don’t know if the voice changes once or twice because I am not an expert.”

“I spoke to Ongwen on radio — greetings and courtesies — but Kony would sometimes discourage courtesies. All battalions and brigades within the LRA had radios and so did Ongwen.”

When Ongwen’s lawyer asked about various individuals, including Ocaka Luwum and “Abonga Wod Dano”, which the witness said was Abunga Won Dano.

An exchange between the witness and lawyer Odongo turned testy when the latter “If you want to ask me a question, ask it clearly,” the witness retorted.

“You don’t have to be difficult about this,” Ongwen’s lawyer said to witness.

Ongwen, a former LRA commander, is on trial for 70 counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity. He was abducted by the LRA when he was 11 years old while walking to Koro Abili Primary School. He was allegedly tortured and forced to watch violent killings as an LRA child soldier. He quickly rose up within the LRA ranks and eventually was promoted by LRA boss Joseph Kony to become head of one of the four brigades, the Sinai Brigade.

On December 21, 2015, prosecutors at the ICC charged Ongwen for murder, abduction, enslavement, and rape among other crimes after he surrendered to the American Special Forces in the Central African Republic. Ongwen and four other LRA commanders, including Kony, were wanted on ICC warrants of arrest in connection with attacks on Odek, Pajule and Abok IDP Camps in northern Uganda in 2004.

Most of the testimony on January 26 was given in closed or private sessions, with no public broadcast since the cross examination mainly covered on areas that could have revealed the witness’s identity.

Presiding Judge Bertram Schmitt said that this was the final session of P-016’s testimony, and a new witness was expected to take the stand on January 27, 2017.

Previous Post

Number One is death, Number Two injuries and Panadol is for escape, witness tells ICC

Next Post

Questions linger on why Uganda did not take out Kony’s army

Journalists For Justice

Journalists For Justice

Related Posts

Michael G. Karnavas, the lead counsel of Kenyan lawyer Paul Gicheru, during the opening of his trial at the International Criminal Court. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Gicheru asks ICC judge to admit new evidence

May 3, 2022
Cyril Laucci, the lead counsel of former Janjaweed commander Ali-Abd-Al-Rahman, during the opening of his trial at the International Criminal Court. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Abd-Al-Rahman paid Janjaweed, witness tells judges

April 27, 2022
Judge Miatta Maria Samba of the International Criminal Court’s Trial Chamber III during the opening of the case of the Prosecutor v Paul Gicheru on February 15, 2022. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Gicheru opposes prosecution bid to introduce ‘fresh’ evidence

April 15, 2022
Former Central African Republic rebel leader Maxime Jeoffroy Eli Mokom Gawaka arrives at the International Criminal Court in The Hague on March 22, 2022 for his first appearance. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Khan wants Mokom to have access to Yekatom-Ngaïssona trial materials

April 13, 2022
Ali Muhammad Ali Abd-Al-Rahman during the opening of his trial at the International Criminal Court in The Hague on Tuesday, April 5, 2022. He faces 31 counts of crimes against humanity and war crimes allegedly committed in Sudan's Darfur region two decades ago. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

First Darfur case opens at the ICC

April 7, 2022
Kenyan lawyer Paul Gicheru during his trial at the International Criminal Court. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Gicheru’s lawyers weigh their options in next stage of ICC case

March 30, 2022
Next Post

Questions linger on why Uganda did not take out Kony's army

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • Hope at last for Kenyan victims, but is TFV’s planned support enough?
  • Gicheru asks ICC judge to admit new evidence
  • Abd-Al-Rahman paid Janjaweed, witness tells judges
  • Gicheru opposes prosecution bid to introduce ‘fresh’ evidence
  • Khan wants Mokom to have access to Yekatom-Ngaïssona trial materials

Recent Comments

  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Kenyan lawyer denies bribery charges at the ICC
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on You did me wrong, Bemba tells ICC as he demands 70 million euros
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Two victims’ lawyers in Kenyatta case in line to become next ICC prosecutor
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Profiles of the four people shortlisted for the job of ICC Prosecutor
  • Write My Essay on Afghanistan case fails to take off at the ICC — pragmatism’ or surrender to the powerful?

Archives

Categories

JFJ – Journalists for Justice

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Browse by Topics:

Archives by Month:

Never Again
INTAHE
BarometreVerite
The Victims' Bantaba
No Result
View All Result
  • Confronting Impunity
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Login

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz