Resources
Sunday, July 3, 2022
  • Login
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result

Browse by Topic:

  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result
Home ICC Cases Africa Cases

Gbagbo and Blé Goudé will hear decision on their further custody

Journalists For JusticebyJournalists For Justice
January 1, 2019
in Africa Cases, ICC Cases
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
0
Gbagbo and Blé Goudé will hear decision on their further custody
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By Thomas Verfuss

Laurent Gbagbo and Blé Goudé will hear on Tuesday if they are to be released from ICC custody or if they have to stay in detention pending further court proceedings.

The 73-year old former president Gbagbo has been in ICC custody for more than 7 years. He has made several previous requests for provisional release, all of which were rejected, with the presiding judge Cuno Tarfusser dissenting. Gbagbo’s former Minister of Sports Charles Blé Goudé has been in ICC custody since 2014.

The judges of the Trial Chamber will also rule on no-case-to-answer motions filed by the two accused. They argue that the prosecution has not presented sufficient evidence that might lead to a conviction for crimes against humanity like murder and rape during the post-election violence in Ivory Coast in 2010/2011. Observers in The Hague would not be surprised if one or two of the accused would be partially or totally acquitted (i.e. on some or all charges), as they consider the presentation of the evidence of the prosecution weak.

Even if Gbagbo and Blé Goudé are fully acquitted, the provisional release motion does not become moot, as the prosecution may argue that they should stay in detention pending a prosecution appeal against the acquittal decision. 

RelatedStories

Gicheru witness tampering trial starts before the ICC

Trial Chamber VI to hear Said Abdel Kani case

Court turns down bid to introduce elusive witness’s testimony, but allows four other statements

As for the provisional release motions: contrary to what some think, freedom during pre-trial and trial proceedings is the rule and detention the exception. It is up to the prosecution to convince the judges that there are circumstances that justify the detention, like the risk that the suspect might flee and hide or that the suspect might intimidate or bribe witnesses. 

After the Uhuru Kenyatta and William Ruto cases collapsed, some have argued that this rule should not be applied the same way at the ICC, because of the extreme gravity of the crimes (more than a thousand dead) and the position of power of the president and vice-president of Kenya that enhanced the possibility of witness tampering.

In the Gbagbo case, observers note the length of more than 7 years of detention without conviction. It took more than 4 years after his transfer to The Hague before the trial even started. Initially, the evidence of the prosecution was too weak to get the charges confirmed by the judges of the pre-trial chamber, and additional investigations had to be done.

The defence points out that the prolonged detention is detrimental to the health of the almost 74-year-old former president.

Gbagbo’s supporters prematurely celebrated in the streets of Abidjan mid-December after the fake news spread that he had already been released. Actually, it is not easy to release a detainee of an international court quickly, even if the decision of the judges has been taken. The ICC and the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, which also had its seat in The Hague, have no territory to release a suspect to, unlike a national court. They depend on the goodwill of a state that is prepared to host the suspect. When their presence in The Hague is required for further proceedings, it would be most logical that The Netherlands be that host state. In the past, the Dutch government almost always refused to let ICC suspects roam free on its territory, even if international judges had decided that further detention was not warranted. Former vice-president Jean-Pierre Bemba of DR Congo could not be provisionally released during his trial, though the trial chamber did not consider further detention necessary. Defence and human rights lawyers have denounced this state of affairs: they quite rightly argue that is up to judges and up to judges only to decide if somebody should stay in the cell, and not up to some immigration bureaucrats. 

As for Gbagbo and Blé Goudé, negotiations may have been going on with Belgium to see if this neighbouring country of The Netherlands would temporarily host them during provisional release. They could then spend weekends there and other days when their presence in The Hague is not required for court hearings.

Previous Post

Time for the ICC to lean in and listen to victims of atrocity crimes

Next Post

Bar association reacts 40 junior lawyers complaints of poor treatment at the ICC

Journalists For Justice

Journalists For Justice

Related Posts

Kenyan lawyer Paul Gicheru at the opening of his trial at the International Criminal Court on February 15, 2022. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Gicheru witness tampering trial starts before the ICC

February 16, 2022
Mr Said during the opening of the confirmation of charges hearing at the seat of the Court in The Hague (The Netherlands) on 12 October 2021 ©ICC-CPI

Trial Chamber VI to hear Said Abdel Kani case

December 20, 2021
Paul Gicheru appearing before the ICC via video-link from the ICC Detention Centre on 6 November 2020. Photo credit: ICC-CPI

Court turns down bid to introduce elusive witness’s testimony, but allows four other statements

December 17, 2021
Special Criminal Court Arrests CAR Minister Bouba for War Crimes. Photo: News Central TV

Pressure mounts for CAR minister to face justice

December 2, 2021
ICC Trial Chamber VIII declares Mr Al Mahdi guilty of the war crime of attacking historic and religious buildings in Timbuktu and sentences him to nine years' imprisonment. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Al Mahdi to be released early after ICC cuts sentence by two years

December 1, 2021
Dominic Ongwen's appeal hearing coming up in February 2022. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI.

Ongwen’s appeal hearing to start in February 2022

November 26, 2021
Next Post
Bar association reacts 40 junior lawyers complaints of poor treatment at the ICC

Bar association reacts 40 junior lawyers complaints of poor treatment at the ICC

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • 20 years of the ICC: The hopes, the disappointments, the future
  • Judge to decide Gicheru’s fate after parties conclude case
  • From Kyiv to Kabul and Darfur: Challenges of reporting justice and human rights
  • Gicheru to attend court session remotely
  • After euphoria of state white paper, victims now demand action on Jammeh

Recent Comments

  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Kenyan lawyer denies bribery charges at the ICC
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on You did me wrong, Bemba tells ICC as he demands 70 million euros
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Two victims’ lawyers in Kenyatta case in line to become next ICC prosecutor
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Profiles of the four people shortlisted for the job of ICC Prosecutor
  • Write My Essay on Afghanistan case fails to take off at the ICC — pragmatism’ or surrender to the powerful?

Archives

Categories

JFJ – Journalists for Justice

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Browse by Topics:

Archives by Month:

Never Again
INTAHE
BarometreVerite
The Victims' Bantaba
No Result
View All Result
  • Confronting Impunity
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Login

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz