Resources
Thursday, August 18, 2022
  • Login
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result

Browse by Topic:

  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
  • Virtual Exhibition
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
  • Virtual Exhibition
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result
Home The ICC

Gicheru asks ICC judge to admit new evidence

Janet SankalebyJanet Sankale
May 3, 2022
in The ICC
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
0
Michael G. Karnavas, the lead counsel of Kenyan lawyer Paul Gicheru, during the opening of his trial at the International Criminal Court. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Michael G. Karnavas, the lead counsel of Kenyan lawyer Paul Gicheru, during the opening of his trial at the International Criminal Court. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Kenyan lawyer Paul Gicheru has asked the International Criminal Court to allow him to introduce new evidence, even after informing the court that he would not present a defence case during his trial for witness tampering.

The request came shortly after he notified the ICC’s Trial Chamber III and the prosecution that he did not intend to mount a defence in a filing dated April 25, 2022.

He filed an application to introduce evidence other than through a witness (a bar table motion). Gicheru, through his counsel, Michael G. Karnavas, asked the court to admit 74 documents relating to eight Office of the Prosecutor (OTP) witnesses, including P-0800, P-0341, P-0613, P-0274, P-0738, P-0516, and P-0739.

The documents include investigation reports, witness statements, transcripts of interviews, witness-related expense reports, transcripts from the main case of Kenya’s Deputy President William Ruto and radio journalist Joshua Arap Sang, forensic extraction reports, OTP screening notes, email communications, translations of transcripts of audio-recorded telephone calls, and statements given to Kenyan human rights organisations and other entities.

The defence asked the chamber to recognise the items, which it said were contained in Annex A of the application, as formally submitted into the record of the case. Karnavas explained that Annex A “…set out in detail the relevance, probative value, and authenticity of all items tendered for admission… All items are prima facie relevant and are probative of the issues at trial, namely the credibility of the witnesses that testified during the OTP’s case-in-chief. Any prejudice caused by the introduction of these items is substantially outweighed by their probative value. None of the prior recorded testimony listed in Annex A is submitted for the truth of its contents.”

RelatedStories

Pre-trial chamber ordered to explain rejection of Mokom counsel

Review of the ICC – A good start but still a bumpy ride ahead

Failed promises: No lessons learnt as still no journalists from situation countries at ICC trials

In response, the prosecution consented to the admission of only six of the 74 items – 37, 42, 45, and 63-65 – and opposed the rest.

Commenting on Gicheru’s notice that his team would not present a defence while at the same time asking the court to admit more evidence, Trial Chamber III’s Judge Miatta Maria Samba said: “The chamber understands the notice not to present ‘a case’ as the defence’s notification that it will not be presenting a case through the calling of witnesses. However, the chamber interprets the defence’s bar table motion as that it still intends to tender evidence into the record.”

She further directed the defence to file any motion it wishes the chamber to rule on by May 4, 2022.

After the prosecution concluded its presentation of witnesses on March 24, 2022, Gicheru was given a month to notify the court whether he would mount a defence.

Karnavas has all along questioned the credibility of the prosecution’s witnesses, claiming that they are untruthful and dishonest.

In an email interview with Journalists For Justice on why he had not bothered to call witnesses, he was dismissive of the prosecution’s case, calling it “pathetic”, “embarrassing”, and “amateurish”. He claimed it was “… absent of any credible and verifiable evidence…”

“Save for the evidence adduced through cross-examination, no defence was warranted,” he said, and insisted that the burden of proof is with the prosecution.

Earlier, the court had rejected the prosecution’s application to submit fresh evidence.

The OTP had requested the court to allow it a variation of time limit to add five items to its evidence list; to submit eight items of evidence other than through a witness; and to introduce prior recorded evidence of witness P-0397. It explained that the new evidence would “assist the court to determine the truth and contribute to the expeditious conclusion of the trial”.

Gicheru had opposed the application, saying the admission of the items not only offended his full enjoyment of a fair trial and right of confrontation, but denied the court the opportunity to meaningfully assess the witnesses for motive, bias, memory, perception, and demeanour in order to establish their credibility.

The court ruled that it did not recognise the items as formally submitted and barred the prosecution from presenting them.

It also rejected the request for the introduction of prior recorded evidence of witness P-0397, saying it had already ruled on the matter.

Gicheru’s trial started on February 15, 2022. The prosecution presented eight witnesses, who were all cross-examined by the defence. Gicheru is facing charges of witness tampering in the main Ruto and Sang case.

Previous Post

Abd-Al-Rahman paid Janjaweed, witness tells judges

Next Post

Hope at last for Kenyan victims, but is TFV’s planned support enough?

Janet Sankale

Janet Sankale

Send me an Email

Related Posts

On March 22, 2022, Maxine Jeoffroy Eli Mokom Gawaka appeared before Pre-Trial Chamber II of the International Criminal Court (ICC). Photo Credit: @ICC-CPI

Pre-trial chamber ordered to explain rejection of Mokom counsel

August 9, 2022
Assembly of States Parties (ASP).

Review of the ICC – A good start but still a bumpy ride ahead

July 29, 2022
Photo Credit: International Criminal Court

Failed promises: No lessons learnt as still no journalists from situation countries at ICC trials

July 18, 2022
The judges of the International Criminal Court in 2018.

20 years of gender justice at the ICC – a call for optimism and persistence

July 8, 2022
The International Criminal Court marks its 20th anniversary on July 1, 2022. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

20 years of the ICC: The hopes, the disappointments, the future

July 1, 2022
Kenyan lawyer Paul Gicheru's lead counsel Michael Karnavas giving his closing statements on June 27, 2022, at the International Criminal Court. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Judge to decide Gicheru’s fate after parties conclude case

June 28, 2022
Next Post
Elizabeth Atieno, a survivor of the 2007/2008 post-election violence in Kenya and also an advocate against sexual violence, speaks in Nairobi during a function to mark the seventh International Day for the Elimination of Sexual Violence in Conflict in June 2021. Photo Credit: Twitter

Hope at last for Kenyan victims, but is TFV’s planned support enough?

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • Fewer cases of violence and human rights abuses reported in Kenya’s election
  • ICC shadow looms large over Kenya’s 2022 elections
  • Pre-trial chamber ordered to explain rejection of Mokom counsel
  • A peek into history as Kenya remembers brave mothers and freedom fighters
  • Review of the ICC – A good start but still a bumpy ride ahead

Recent Comments

  • Victims fund project raises questions among CSOs in Kenya on Hope at last for Kenyan victims, but is TFV’s planned support enough?
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Victims fund project raises questions among CSOs in Kenya
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on How we’ll work with Kenyan victims: TFV explains assistance programme
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Hope at last for Kenyan victims, but is TFV’s planned support enough?
  • EL INFIERNO REINA EN EL PARAÍSO DE UGANDA | IBI World España on Why Uganda is not happy to pay less in dispute with DRC

Archives

Categories

JFJ – Journalists for Justice

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Browse by Topics:

Archives by Month:

Never Again
INTAHE
BarometreVerite
The Victims' Bantaba
No Result
View All Result
  • Confronting Impunity
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Login

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz