• About US
  • Our Work
Sunday, June 1, 2025
  • Login
Journalists For Justice (JFJ)
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists For Justice (JFJ)
No Result
View All Result

Kenyan court dismisses most of the case against police for involvement in post-election violence

bySusan Kendi
October 6, 2020
in Kenyan Cases
Reading Time: 4 mins read
53
A A
Kenyan court dismisses most of the case against police for involvement in post-election violence

The petitioners' lawyer, Mbugua Mureithi, addresses Judge Fred Ochieng during a March 5, 2020 hearing at the High Court in Kisumu. Credit: Susan Kendi

17
SHARES
189
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Whatsapp

By Susan Kendi

Kenya’s High Court has dismissed the bulk of a case in which petitioners alleged the government failed to protect them from police shootings during the violence that erupted after the December 2007 presidential election.

Judge Fred Ochieng determined that 12 out of the 15 petitioners who had filed a case before him at the High Court in Kisumu had failed to prove their case. He said they had failed to provide evidence to show police were involved in unlawful shootings or had shot them during the violence that shook Kenya between December 2007 and February 2008.

In his July 27 judgment, Judge Ochieng said he reached this conclusion, “because this is not a case in which all the Petitioners were together at one particular place, when the matters complained of took place. If the circumstances in which the incident took place were same for the Petitioners, the findings on the issue of liability would apply in uniform manner, for all the Petitioners”.

RelatedPosts

Court turns down bid to introduce elusive witness’s testimony, but allows four other statements

ICC plenary rejects bid to disqualify Gicheru trial judge

Court sets Gicheru trial date

“But because the circumstances were different for each Petitioner, the Court was obliged to make specific findings based upon the evidence tendered by each Petitioner. Therefore, for all petitioners who tendered no evidence at the trial, I find that their respective claims have no factual foundation: the same are thus dismissed,” said Judge Ochieng.

The lawyer for the petitioners, Mbugua Mureithi, told Journalists for Justice he only got to know about the July 27 judgement in September.

“The first time for us to participate in the petition [since] last year, was in September. I informed the court that all these things have been happening behind our back … we have seen the judgement… we will make an application to seek leave for us to file a notice of appeal out of time,” said Mureithi.

The petitioners are 13 individuals and two civil society organisations: Citizens against Violence and the Independent Medico-Legal Unit. They first filed their petition in February 2013 in Nairobi. The case was later moved to the High Court in Kisumu. Among the things the petitioners were seeking were court orders to compel the government to effectively investigate unlawful police shootings during the post-election violence that occurred between December 2007 and February 2008.

This violence erupted after Mwai Kibaki was declared the winner of the presidential election that was held on December 27, 2007. The Commission of Inquiry into Post-Election Violence said in its report released in October 2008, that 1,133 people died in the violence out which 405 deaths were caused by gunshots wounds from police shootings.

The three petitioners Judge Ochieng found had been harmed by the actions of the police are Alice Atieno Ochieng, Hudson Bob Libabu and Tobias Wanga Odhiambo. The judge determined Odhiambo provided enough evidence to prove that it was the police that shot him.

“The police action was unlawful and brutal. It violated the 12th petitioner’s right to security of the person,” the judge said, referring to Odhiambo. He is number 12 on the list of petitioners. Judge Ochieng found that the police were responsible for failing to investigate and prosecute the perpetrator of the unlawful shooting of Odhiambo.

The Inspector General of Police is one of the respondents to the petition. The other respondents are the Attorney General, the Director of Public Prosecutions and the Independent Policing Oversight Authority.

In his summary of Odhiambo’s testimony, Judge Ochieng said Odhiambo was shot while crossing the road in the company of three other people. He sustained a gunshot wound on the lower part of his right leg. Four police officers armed with rifles appeared and accused one of their colleagues of injuring Odhiambo without any justification.

The judge said Odhiambo testified that one of the officers cut a piece of his shirt sleeve and tied it on his leg to stop the bleeding and they rushed him to hospital where he was admitted until February 2008. He was then transferred to Tenwek Mission Hospital, where his right leg was amputated below the knee because it was so badly infected and it could not be saved.

The other two petitioners Judge Ochieng found the government liable for the harm they suffered are Alice Atieno Ochieng and Hudson Bob Libabu.

In his summary of the testimony of Alice Atieno Ochieng, the judge said she was shot in Kisumu and produced a Kenya Police medical report form (P3 form) showing that she had reported the incident to the Kondele police station on May 19, 2008. The judge said she could not identify the person who shot her and hence failed to prove that it was a police officer who shot her. He said that Alice Atieno Ochieng testified that her landlord, Eliud Otieno, witnessed the shooting and told her it was a police officer who shot her. Judge Ochieng said Otieno did not testify and Alice Atieno Ochieng’s account could not be corroborated.

Judge Ochieng said that Hudson Bob Libabu testified that he reported the shooting of his daughter, Barbara Sereta Lumwaji, at the Central police station in Kisumu. The judge said when Libabu reported his daughter’s killing he was informed the police had already opened an inquest into her death.

The judge found that the Attorney General and the Inspector General of Police violated Alice Atieno Ochieng’s and Hudson Bob Libabu’s right “to information and effective remedy”.

Share7Tweet4Send
Previous Post

“Disgruntled” candidate speaks out as 123 States search for new ICC Prosecutor

Next Post

Kenyan lawyer denies bribery charges at the ICC

Next Post
Kenyan lawyer, Paul Gicheru during his first appearance before Judge Reine Adélaïde Sophie Alapini-Gansou on November 6, 2020.Gicheru is alleged to have bribed or attempted to bribe six prosecution witnesses in 2013. Credit: ICC

Kenyan lawyer denies bribery charges at the ICC

Please login to join discussion

Recent Posts

  • Karim Khan’s exit deals another blow to the troubled ICC
  • Proposed war crimes court holds hope for justice and accountability in Liberia
  • Dilemma of ICC-wanted Netanyahu’s visit high on the agenda of new leadership in Germany
  • Michael Correa’s US conviction brings into sharp focus the slow pace of transitional justice in The Gambia
  • Genocide marks 31 years and the clock is ticking for six Rwandans held in Niger

About

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Twitter Facebook Instagram LinkedIn

Archives by Month:

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.