Resources
Thursday, May 26, 2022
  • Login
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result

Browse by Topic:

  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result
Home The ICC

LRA commanders charged radios with cars and solar panels — witness

Journalists for JusticebyJournalists for Justice
January 18, 2016
in The ICC
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
0

On 6 December 2016, the trial in the case The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen opened before Trial Chamber IX at the seat of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, Netherlands. Dominic Ongwen is accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity allegedly committed in northern Uganda. Trial Chamber IX is composed of presiding Judge Bertram Schmitt, Judge Péter Kovács, and Judge Raul Cano Pangalangan. Pictured here: Dominic Ongwen at the opening of his trial in the ICC Courtroom I on 6 December 2016 © ICC-CPI

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By Susan Kendi

Lord’s Resistance Army boss Joseph Kony rarely used radio communication, preferring to use one of the signalers instead, but sometimes he did speak personally.

An overview witness testifying for the prosecution in the Dominic Ongwen trial at the International Criminal Court revealed how Kony and other LRA commanders communicated in a report on the logs of intercepted radio chatter.

Ongwen, a former LRA commander, is on trial for 70 charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity at the International Criminal Court after he surrendered to American Special Forces in the Central African Republic in October 2015. His boss, Kony, is still at large despite the issuance of an ICC warrant of arrest in 2005.

Testifying under a protected identity, with video and sound distortion, the witness known as P0403 described the type of orders that came from Kony as concerning the general nature of the war and increasing the tempo of excursions. The witness, who works in the analysis section of the Office of the Prosecutor, examined logbooks documenting LRA communication intercepted by the Ugandan government forces.

RelatedStories

Said Abdel Kani to remain in custody as Appeals Chamber rejects his plea for release

Parties prepare to wind up Gicheru case

Gicheru asks ICC judge to admit new evidence

Phones were used to coordinate operations, coordinate meetings, communicate about the transfer of weapons and ammunition, decree punishment and mete out discipline and for logistics.

LRA commanders were required to report within a week after an attack about the number of civilians killed or abducted, the type of destruction caused and the enemy soldiers killed. Commanders also detailed the target hit – whether it was a camp for the internally displaced, a vehicle or a military camp. In the witness report, he described on how the Ugandan Government intercepted the process of the LRA communication.

LRA forces mainly used long-range radio communications in primarily Acholi language but with a bit of Kiswahili and English thrown in a few times.

“I recall Mr Ongwen, Vincent Otti, Charles and Okot Odhiambo’s names as recording some attacks,” said the witness.

Ongwen did not communicate much on the radio and was specifically instructed by Kony to state his position and report on any attack conducted. Sometimes Kony harangued Ongwen about not coming on air, insisting that irrespective of the Ugandan armed forces’ pressure he should still come on the radio. Ongwen would sometimes talk using a signaler.

The LRA, the witness said, communicated four times a day on radio, every day of the week: early morning, late morning at around 11am, early afternoon (1 pm or so) and later in the day at around 4.30 pm to 6 pm. Kony determined the timing of LRA communications.

Commanders that didn’t have radios communicated through shortwave radio (walkie-talkies) and satellite phones. Kony, Otti and the LRA Director of Signals determined the frequency of the radio. The LRA changed the radio frequency from time to time, especially if operations didn’t go as well as they liked, since they thought that maybe the Ugandan Government was overhearing their conversations.

The LRA obtained the radios by attacking URP Barracks, UN offices and religious missions. The radios were powered using a vehicle, car or motorcycle batteries and solar panels.

LRA reportedly used a code, known as Tonfas, to conceal their messages and only people with a radio within the LRA commanders’ ranks and the Ugandan government interceptors who “broke” the codes could hear them. Besides the Tonfas system, widely known proverbs, jargons and metaphors among the LRA were used. For example, a mountain referred to a church; mentioning a ram was instruction for a group to retreat; waya (Acholi) to refer to civilians and atabo (Acholi for a two by two dance) referred to aeroplanes.

Code signs were used to mask the voice and identity of the commanders in case the Ugandan government was listening. LRA had up to 30 radios and roughly a dozen individuals had radio at a time, depending on how active one was, and the type and frequency of operations.

The Internal Security Organization intercepted communication out of Gulu Barracks, attempted to decode them and recorded the material on cassette tapes. Interceptors included various commanders who communicated and their locations. Ugandan police also LRA communication. He explained to the court on the naming and organization of intercept evidence and logbooks.

The witness read through a report on LRA communications about the Pajule attack based on the ISO logbooks that report on contact between Otti and Kony about plans to attack the area. “Kony felt so happy about Otti’s plans regarding Pajule attack,” the witness added.

Previous Post

ICC Prosecution and Victims lawyer remain steadfast

Next Post

Pre-trial of Uganda’s ex-LRA rebel commander, Ongwen to begin at ICC

Journalists for Justice

Journalists for Justice

Related Posts

Former Central African Republic rebel leader Mahamat Said Abdel Kani at the opening of his confirmation of charges hearing at the International Criminal Court in October 2021. Photo credit: @nICC-CPI

Said Abdel Kani to remain in custody as Appeals Chamber rejects his plea for release

May 25, 2022
Kenyan lawyer Paul Gicheru and his lawyer. Michael G. Karnavas, during the hearing of his case at the International Criminal Court in The Hague. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Parties prepare to wind up Gicheru case

May 20, 2022
Michael G. Karnavas, the lead counsel of Kenyan lawyer Paul Gicheru, during the opening of his trial at the International Criminal Court. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Gicheru asks ICC judge to admit new evidence

May 3, 2022
Cyril Laucci, the lead counsel of former Janjaweed commander Ali-Abd-Al-Rahman, during the opening of his trial at the International Criminal Court. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Abd-Al-Rahman paid Janjaweed, witness tells judges

April 27, 2022
Judge Miatta Maria Samba of the International Criminal Court’s Trial Chamber III during the opening of the case of the Prosecutor v Paul Gicheru on February 15, 2022. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Gicheru opposes prosecution bid to introduce ‘fresh’ evidence

April 15, 2022
Former Central African Republic rebel leader Maxime Jeoffroy Eli Mokom Gawaka arrives at the International Criminal Court in The Hague on March 22, 2022 for his first appearance. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Khan wants Mokom to have access to Yekatom-Ngaïssona trial materials

April 13, 2022
Next Post

Pre-trial of Uganda's ex-LRA rebel commander, Ongwen to begin at ICC

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • Said Abdel Kani to remain in custody as Appeals Chamber rejects his plea for release
  • Are we ready? CSOs audit Kenya’s election preparedness
  • Parties prepare to wind up Gicheru case
  • Hope at last for Kenyan victims, but is TFV’s planned support enough?
  • Gicheru asks ICC judge to admit new evidence

Recent Comments

  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Kenyan lawyer denies bribery charges at the ICC
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on You did me wrong, Bemba tells ICC as he demands 70 million euros
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Two victims’ lawyers in Kenyatta case in line to become next ICC prosecutor
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Profiles of the four people shortlisted for the job of ICC Prosecutor
  • Write My Essay on Afghanistan case fails to take off at the ICC — pragmatism’ or surrender to the powerful?

Archives

Categories

JFJ – Journalists for Justice

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Browse by Topics:

Archives by Month:

Never Again
INTAHE
BarometreVerite
The Victims' Bantaba
No Result
View All Result
  • Confronting Impunity
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Login

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz