• About US
  • Our Work
Saturday, May 31, 2025
  • Login
Journalists For Justice (JFJ)
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists For Justice (JFJ)
No Result
View All Result

Next steps in Ongwen trial after Defense motion

byJournalists For Justice
February 2, 2019
in Africa Cases, ICC Cases
Reading Time: 3 mins read
23
A A
7
SHARES
78
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Whatsapp

By Tom Maliti

The defense of Dominic Ongwen filed a motion asking judges of the International Criminal Court (ICC) to dismiss as many as 41 of the 70 counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity Ongwen has been charged. This has raised questions about what will happen next in the trial of Ongwen.

One thing that will not change – irrespective of what else happens in connection with the motion the defense has titled the “Defects Series” – is that Ongwen will still be the person who has been charged with the most counts in the ICC’s history.

Will the trial stop or be suspended?

RelatedPosts

Dilemma of ICC-wanted Netanyahu’s visit high on the agenda of new leadership in Germany

Impunity continues to rob Sudanese victims of peace and justice

Rodrigo Duterte arrest heralds hope for justice for Philippines’ victims of ‘war on drugs’

The trial will continue as scheduled. The next hearing has been set for Monday, February 18. In the motion they filed on February 1, Ongwen’s lawyers did not ask the judges of Trial Chamber IX to stay or suspend the trial. This means the judges will only be considering the legal issues they have raised in the motion and not whether there is justification in stopping or suspending the trial.

What are the next steps?

Judges gave the prosecution and lawyers representing victims until February 25 to file their responses to the defense motion. Judges allowed each party to file responses of up to 65 pages long. After February 25, the defense may ask the trial chamber if they can reply to the prosecution and lawyer for victims’ responses. It is not automatic the chamber will grant such a request. Once all the responses, and any reply, are filed the chamber will then have time to make a decision. There is no time limit for the chamber to do so.

What happens if the judges decline the defense’s request?

Trial Chamber IX can decline to grant the defense’s request to dismiss 41 counts against Ongwen. If this happens the trial will continue as scheduled. The defense will be expected to continue calling its witnesses. The defense have said that they intend to call as many as 66 witnesses. So far, 15 defense witnesses have testified.

What happens if the judges accept the defense’s request?

Trial Chamber IX may choose to grant the defense’s request to dismiss 41 counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity against Ongwen. This means the defense will have fewer charges to fight. If the judges make such a decision it would reduce the counts Ongwen is facing to 29. In such a scenario the defense could ask the court for a break to allow them to assess and adjust their defense strategy.

Do the judges have to accept the entirety of the defense’s request?

The judges may also choose to grant only part of the defense’s request to dismiss the 41 counts against Ongwen. This would still mean the defense will have fewer charges to fight.

This was first published on the International Justice Monitor.

Share3Tweet2Send
Previous Post

A Central African national, Ngaïssona has been transferred to the ICC

Next Post

The European Union needs to withdraw from the upcoming joint summit

Next Post

The European Union needs to withdraw from the upcoming joint summit

Please login to join discussion

Recent Posts

  • Karim Khan’s exit deals another blow to the troubled ICC
  • Proposed war crimes court holds hope for justice and accountability in Liberia
  • Dilemma of ICC-wanted Netanyahu’s visit high on the agenda of new leadership in Germany
  • Michael Correa’s US conviction brings into sharp focus the slow pace of transitional justice in The Gambia
  • Genocide marks 31 years and the clock is ticking for six Rwandans held in Niger

About

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Twitter Facebook Instagram LinkedIn

Archives by Month:

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.