Resources
Sunday, June 26, 2022
  • Login
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result

Browse by Topic:

  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result
Home ICC Cases Africa Cases

Oppressive silence over justice for LRA’s female abductees

Susan KendibySusan Kendi
April 24, 2020
in Africa Cases, Commentary, Domestic Court Cases, Memory and Atrocity, Ongwen, Opinion, SGBV
Reading Time: 7 mins read
A A
0
Oppressive silence over justice for LRA’s female abductees

A village in Northern Uganda Photo credits: Robin Yamaguchi https://www.flickr.com/photos/18199113@N02/1987983458/

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By Susan Kendi

A hush has fallen on the International Criminal Court as judges deliberate on the fate the Lord’s Resistance Army commander who was charged with crimes against humanity, but a deeper silence persists on the true scale of injury suffered by women forced into marriage during the 30-year insurgency in northern Uganda.

As the world awaits the decision on the Dominic Ongwen trial, former female abductees of the LRA war still bear numerous physical and psychological scars more than 15 years since they returned to their villages.  Ongwen’s trial was meant to serve as a truth-seeking journey and a search for accountability for the violations committed against women and children born in captivity. However, it is unlikely address the irreversible social effects the war has had on them or resolve their immediate economic and livelihood challenges. Women who returned to civilian life through the Amnesty Commission established under Uganda’s Amnesty Act of 2000, received resettlement assistance of a blanket, mattress, saucepan, a hoe and UGX235,000 ($62) as startup capital — similar to what LRA male returnees got. After running for four years, between 2005 and 2009, the re-integration package was suspended due to financial constraints. Non-Governmental Organisations that offered humanitarian assistance to the returnees also folded up and closed shop at the end of war in 2006.

A cloud of stigma and suspicion hangs over the heads of women forced into marriages with rebels and bore them children. Most of the children born of these forced unions are out of school because their mothers cannot afford the fees. Those who can attend school are stigmatized with the label of ‘rebel children’. Uganda’s patrilineal culture frowns on women giving birth to children out of wedlock and excludes such offspring from the inheritance of land and home.

Children with bullet wounds and other injuries from the bush are unable to receive medical care for lack of money. The women who have attempted to make a fresh start by remarrying after leaving the rebel life in the bush struggle to cope with schisms in their families. Their husbands refuse to care for the children of captivity the women came into the marriage with, and some women have had to leave such children with their own ageing parents.

RelatedStories

Selective approach to TRRC recommendations a sure recipe for defeating justice

For Jammeh, sexual violence was a weapon of repression and torture

Trial Chamber VI to hear Said Abdel Kani case

Most of the children born in captivity have no birth certificate, a document that proves their Ugandan nationality and would open the door to rights, legal protection and services due to citizens. The combination of a lack of identity, financial means and rejection has forced some of the children to join the Uganda People’s Defence Forces, but many are driven to a precarious life on the streets or to suicide.

In, Gulu, a town in northern Uganda, birth certificates are now being issued without question after the government promised in 2019 to allocate money to the National Identification and Registration Authority to launch a special registration programme for some 6,000 children born during the war.

“If Kony can still come hack, I will go back to the bush,” says Grace Akello, a mother of children born in captivity. “There, everything is free. But here, I cannot even provide for my children. I only sell charcoal to get money for renting the house, provide food for children and I cannot pay them at school. If I am sick, there is nothing to do but keep on sleeping on an empty stomach if somebody has not helped us with his or her sympathy. I live with my children at home because I cannot afford … their school fees. I have no land to live on with them but every month I have to rent this small house. My children have grown up and we all share the same room. There is no privacy in my house. We are living a difficult life really,” she says in a story posted on the website of the community based organization, War Victims and Children Networking.

Most girls were abducted when they were between the ages of eight to 14 years on their way to school or home. Others were captured from their homes, barely literate and prepubescent, robbed of the protection of their families and communities, and carted off into the bush where they were labeled as “ting tings,” and distributed to the various households as baby sitters and domestic workers before being forced into marriage.

The Ugandan government has never acknowledged its failure to protect women from the crimes committed by both rebels and the Uganda People’s Defence Forces during the 30-year conflict.

Some mothers watched their children being thrown into the bush whenever they cried or slowed the rebels down. Others were locked in houses and burnt, while others watched their children put in polythene bags and beaten to death.

A prosecution witness in the Ongwen trial, P-187, told ICC judges on March 22, 2018 the harrowing details of how some mothers watched LRA fighters put their children in polythene bags and beat them to death, threw others who were months old in the bush, and locked some in houses before setting them on fire. She revealed that one of the mothers later found her child known as ‘Chana’ but he has a mental problem and learning difficulties due to the head injury he suffered at the time.

The LRA collapsed the social structure, subverting traditional, cultural or religious rites of courtship and marriage, thus denying the mothers and children born in captivity the social benefits accruing from the union. Women were no longer viewed as individuals but as property and rewards. No girl was allowed to decide on the partner she wanted to marry and neither was she consulted on whether she was ready to start a family. They were distributed and dished out as awards for the top performing LRA fighters who repeatedly raped them.

Forced marriage irrevocably changed the status of the women to wives, which significantly contributed to the social stigma they and their children continue to suffer.

Without reproductive autonomy, most girls and women were forced to get pregnant and confined until they gave birth. Additionally, they were punished for failing in their domestic duties, if they refused to have sex with their ‘husbands’ and killed if they tried to escape.

Those who escaped and returned home had to apply for amnesty. This imposed an additional burden of stigma or being labeled as perpetrators or rebel collaborators on the returnees, according to a 48-page report by International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), ‘From Rejection to Redress’.

The amnesty process was more of the victims accepting wrongdoing even though their abduction was not by choice but a violation of their rights.

“By granting amnesty to girls and women who were abducted and victims of sexual violence, the government is putting the blame on those it failed to protect and in a way further distancing itself from accepting responsibility for failing to protect them from violations,” the report stated.

The Uganda government’s legal response has been one-sided with only two former LRA commanders put on trial; Ongwen in The Hague, Netherlands, and Thomas Kwoyelo at the International Crimes Division in Uganda.

Efforts to bring to justice members of the Uganda People’s Defence Force and Local Defence Units has also proved difficult and has been resisted by the government, which claims that the liable UPDF soldiers have been investigated and punished for their crimes. The state alleges that a small group of troops committed wrongful acts without their superiors’ knowledge or support.

There has never been a public record of proceedings or evidence showing that the crimes committed by the UPDF soldiers have been investigated or those implicated held to account. Additionally, there is no public information on the outcome of the ICC prosecutor’s intention to investigate crimes committed by the state actors.

A former junior LRA commander and father from Gulu mentioned in the ICTJ’s report said, “There is no justice in Uganda … In the war, there were some UPDF who raped our women in front of their men, but up to now no one has held them accountable. All you hear is about are LRA atrocities.”

Ongwen was charged with 70 counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in northern Uganda between 2002 and 2005.The crimes include rape, murder, torture, forced marriage, sexual slavery, enslavement, conscription and use of children under the age of 15 years during attacks on Pajule, Odek and Abok camps for internally displaced persons, which led to the displacement of thousands.

Kwoyelo is facing 93 charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity after he was captured in 2009 by UPDF troops in the Democratic Republic of Congo. He is the first rebel commander to be tried before the ICD over the conflict between the LRA and the UPDF in northern Uganda.

Previous Post

Police brutality more profound amidst anti-corona spread curfews and lockdowns

Next Post

Kenyan judge to set judgement date in SGBV case in June

Susan Kendi

Susan Kendi

Related Posts

Gambian Justice Minister Dawda Jallow released the Government White Paper on the Report of the Truth, Justice and Reparations Commision on May 25, 2022. Photo credit: Facebook

Selective approach to TRRC recommendations a sure recipe for defeating justice

June 2, 2022
Former beauty pageant winner Fatou Jallow aka Toufa. The TRRC recommends that former president Yahya Jammeh should be procusecuted for raping her. Photo credit: Jason Florio and Helen Florio from Gambia- Victims and Resisters.

For Jammeh, sexual violence was a weapon of repression and torture

February 16, 2022
Mr Said during the opening of the confirmation of charges hearing at the seat of the Court in The Hague (The Netherlands) on 12 October 2021 ©ICC-CPI

Trial Chamber VI to hear Said Abdel Kani case

December 20, 2021
Tanzania former President John Pombe Magufuli. Photo: Charles Onyango- Obbo Twitter

Victory for human rights as Tanzania allows young mothers back in school

December 15, 2021
Empty seats in one of the two big plenary halls (accessible only via limited badges and special tickets for NGO observers) on Day 2. (Credit: Shirleen Chin)

COP26 failed to deliver, so ICC and ICJ the next stop for seekers of climate justice

December 2, 2021
Special Criminal Court Arrests CAR Minister Bouba for War Crimes. Photo: News Central TV

Pressure mounts for CAR minister to face justice

December 2, 2021
Next Post
Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Public Service, Youth and Gender Affairs, Madam Sisily Kariuki, officiates the peace march during the launch of National Gender-Based Violence Helpline 1195.

Kenyan judge to set judgement date in SGBV case in June

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • From Kyiv to Kabul and Darfur: Challenges of reporting justice and human rights
  • Gicheru to attend court session remotely
  • After euphoria of state white paper, victims now demand action on Jammeh
  • Right the Wrongs: Spotlight on the 2020 General Election in Tanzania
  • Selective approach to TRRC recommendations a sure recipe for defeating justice

Recent Comments

  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Kenyan lawyer denies bribery charges at the ICC
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on You did me wrong, Bemba tells ICC as he demands 70 million euros
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Two victims’ lawyers in Kenyatta case in line to become next ICC prosecutor
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Profiles of the four people shortlisted for the job of ICC Prosecutor
  • Write My Essay on Afghanistan case fails to take off at the ICC — pragmatism’ or surrender to the powerful?

Archives

Categories

JFJ – Journalists for Justice

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Browse by Topics:

Archives by Month:

Never Again
INTAHE
BarometreVerite
The Victims' Bantaba
No Result
View All Result
  • Confronting Impunity
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Login

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz