Resources
Sunday, June 26, 2022
  • Login
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result

Browse by Topic:

  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result
Home complementarity

Sentencing dilemma for international courts as Karadzic gets life

Journalists For JusticebyJournalists For Justice
March 20, 2019
in complementarity, Domestic Court Cases, ICC Cases
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
0
Sentencing dilemma for international courts as Karadzic gets life
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By Thomas Verfuss in The Hague

A United Nations appeals chamber on Wednesday sentenced former Bosnian Serb president Radovan Karadzic to life in prison.

It found that the sentence of 40 years imprisonment imposed by the ICTY trial chamber for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes was “unreasonable and plainly unjust”.

Judges in national systems like England can look back on centuries of practice and precedent when they have to determine the appropriate sentence after convicting for a given crime. When the UN set up an international criminal court for the first time in 1993, the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) that was based in The Hague, the Security Council defined which crimes the new ad hoc court would have jurisdiction for: war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity.

But whereas national systems typically have criminal codes that list not only the crimes, but also indicate the sentences that can be imposed in case of conviction, the UN Security Council did no such thing. It only said that the ICTY could not impose the death penalty, as that would have been unacceptable for many UN member states as a matter of human rights. Developing a sentencing practice was left to the judges.

RelatedStories

Gicheru witness tampering trial starts before the ICC

Trial Chamber VI to hear Said Abdel Kani case

Court turns down bid to introduce elusive witness’s testimony, but allows four other statements

But in an international court judges always come from lots of different countries with different sentencing practices, so they would have different ideas about the sentence to be imposed. (In the Karadzic case, the appeals judges from Denmark, Tanzania and Uruguay decided to increase his sentence to life in prison, but the judges from Spain and Portugal dissented and voted against it.)

ICTY judges further dissented on the question of whether they should be bound by the sentencing practices in the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY), the country whose bloody disintegration led to the establishment of the ICTY. Some judges insisted on the importance of the old Roman rule: nullam poenam sine lege (no penalty without law). A citizen must be able to find in the law which sentence to expect on conviction for a crime. Other judges said they would just take ‘guidance’ from the SFRY sentencing practice, but were not bound by it.

For the young court, the absence of ‘tariffs’ and the conflicting ideas about what to do meant that people comparing judgments would often find the sentencing practice disproportionate, illogical, unreasonable and thus unjust.

In the Karadzic case, judges of the UN International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals (IRMCT), where judgments  of the defunct ICTY can be appealed, compared the 40 years Karadzic got at the ICTY to the life sentences imposed to four of his subordinates for less crimes. Therefore a majority of three of the five appeal judges found the 40 years unreasonable and plainly unjust, given the “sheer scale” and “systematic cruelty” of the crimes for which he has been convicted.

During the 1992-1995 war in Bosnia-Hercegovina, more than 100,000 people were killed on all sides (Muslims, Serbs and Croats). That was the highest death toll in any war in Europe after the Second World War.

The Bosnian civil war broke out after the Muslim majority voted in a referendum to secede from the SFRY. The Bosnian Serbs were afraid to become a minority in a Muslim-dominated state and voted in turn to secede from Bosnia. Republika Srpska comprises territories predominantly inhabited by Serbs.

After the fall of Srebrenica on July 11, 1995, Karadzic’s Bosnian Serb troops slaughtered thousands of Muslim men and boys. The massacre is the only genocide in Europe after the Second World War recognized as such by UN courts. In Africa, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) in Arusha (Tanzania) convicted suspects for the 1994 genocide.

Previous Post

Judge leaves fulltime ICC job before Ntaganda decision comes in

Next Post

Complete structural changes needed to improve ICC performance

Journalists For Justice

Journalists For Justice

Related Posts

Kenyan lawyer Paul Gicheru at the opening of his trial at the International Criminal Court on February 15, 2022. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Gicheru witness tampering trial starts before the ICC

February 16, 2022
Mr Said during the opening of the confirmation of charges hearing at the seat of the Court in The Hague (The Netherlands) on 12 October 2021 ©ICC-CPI

Trial Chamber VI to hear Said Abdel Kani case

December 20, 2021
Paul Gicheru appearing before the ICC via video-link from the ICC Detention Centre on 6 November 2020. Photo credit: ICC-CPI

Court turns down bid to introduce elusive witness’s testimony, but allows four other statements

December 17, 2021
Special Criminal Court Arrests CAR Minister Bouba for War Crimes. Photo: News Central TV

Pressure mounts for CAR minister to face justice

December 2, 2021
ICC Trial Chamber VIII declares Mr Al Mahdi guilty of the war crime of attacking historic and religious buildings in Timbuktu and sentences him to nine years' imprisonment. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Al Mahdi to be released early after ICC cuts sentence by two years

December 1, 2021
Dominic Ongwen's appeal hearing coming up in February 2022. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI.

Ongwen’s appeal hearing to start in February 2022

November 26, 2021
Next Post

Complete structural changes needed to improve ICC performance

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • From Kyiv to Kabul and Darfur: Challenges of reporting justice and human rights
  • Gicheru to attend court session remotely
  • After euphoria of state white paper, victims now demand action on Jammeh
  • Right the Wrongs: Spotlight on the 2020 General Election in Tanzania
  • Selective approach to TRRC recommendations a sure recipe for defeating justice

Recent Comments

  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Kenyan lawyer denies bribery charges at the ICC
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on You did me wrong, Bemba tells ICC as he demands 70 million euros
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Two victims’ lawyers in Kenyatta case in line to become next ICC prosecutor
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Profiles of the four people shortlisted for the job of ICC Prosecutor
  • Write My Essay on Afghanistan case fails to take off at the ICC — pragmatism’ or surrender to the powerful?

Archives

Categories

JFJ – Journalists for Justice

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Browse by Topics:

Archives by Month:

Never Again
INTAHE
BarometreVerite
The Victims' Bantaba
No Result
View All Result
  • Confronting Impunity
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Login

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz