Resources
Sunday, June 26, 2022
  • Login
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result

Browse by Topic:

  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result
Home Victim Voices Rwanda

Siblings linked to Kabuga continue 18-year fight to have their assets released

Janet SankalebyJanet Sankale
June 18, 2021
in The ICC
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
0
Félicien Kabuga during his first appearance before the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals Hague Branch on 11 Nov 2020.

Félicien Kabuga during his first appearance before the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals Hague Branch on 11 Nov 2020.

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

François Ngirabatware and his sister, Catherine Mukakayange, have been denied access to their assets and bank accounts for 18 years because of their relationship to former fugitive Félicien Kabuga.

The two fell foul of the law on March 11, 2003, when the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) ordered the freezing of Ngirabatware’s and Mukakayange’s bank accounts in Brussels, Belgium, on suspicion that they could use the assets to help Kabuga evade capture. The court ruled that the Belgian government was obliged to cooperate with the ICTR and its prosecutor and that for as long as Kabuga was a fugitive, the funds should remain unavailable to the two.

At the time, Ngirabatware was a son-in-law of Kabuga, who has been accused of being a major financier of the Rwandan genocide of 1994, in which almost a million people were killed. In 1997, the ICTR indicted Kabuga of seven criminal counts, including genocide and crimes against humanity. He eluded capture for 26 years until May 16, 2020, when he was arrested in an apartment at Asnières-sur-Seine near Paris.

He is currently incarcerated at the United Nations Detention Unit in The Hague, awaiting trial at the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals (IRMCT). The United Nations Security Council established the court on December 22, 2010 to continue the jurisdiction, rights, obligations, and essential functions of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) after the completion of their respective mandates

Ngirabatware and Mukakayange have filed a motion requesting the court to unfreeze their bank accounts, arguing that it no longer maintains an interest in freezing the accounts now that Kabuga has been arrested.

RelatedStories

From Kyiv to Kabul and Darfur: Challenges of reporting justice and human rights

Gicheru to attend court session remotely

Said Abdel Kani to remain in custody as Appeals Chamber rejects his plea for release

Journalists For Justice spoke to Peter Robinson, who is representing Ngirabatware and Mukakayange at IRMCT. He also represented the two before the ICTR. He once defended Radovan Karadžić, former president of the self-declared autonomous Bosnian Serb Republic, before the ICTY.

Journalists For Justice (JFJ): François Ngirabatware and his sister, Catherine Mukakayange, were hit hard by crimes they never committed. They were denied access to their bank accounts, apparently because François married the daughter of one of the world’s most wanted fugitives, Félicien Kabuga. Does this mean that if you are related to a fugitive, you are punished even if you have nothing to do with their crime?

Peter Robinson: The ICTR Prosecutor took the position that anyone related to Félicien Kabuga could possibly assist him to avoid capture and therefore if they had assets, they could be frozen. This sweeping generalisation is unfair and, in my view, illegal, but it was never tested in court at the ICTR.

JFJ: Individual criminal responsibility is a principle of international criminal law and involves a person who is most responsible for the crime, especially senior officials who cannot be tried in the national criminal justice system and are considered likely to manipulate the system. In this case, do you think the principle of individual criminal responsibility has been violated?

Robinson: I don’t think the principle of individual criminal responsibility was violated because they were not charged with committing any crimes. The way it was used at the ICTR instead violated the principle against guilt by association –since the only basis for freezing the assets was François’ association with Félicien Kabuga by having been married to one of his children

JFJ: Mr Ngirabatware and Ms Mukakayange spent years in court corridors and at the financial institution in efforts to obtain access to their funds. Two decades is a long time without access to a personal bank account. How has life been for them?

Robinson: This was a great injustice to them and plunged François into poverty for years. The account held the assets of his trucking business and he lost that business as well as his money. He has not recovered even now, some 18 years later.

JFJ: Mr Ngirabatware and Ms Mukakayange stated that they were the only proprietors of the accounts and Kabuga was neither the source of the accounts nor interested in them. Mr Ngirabatware declared in an affidavit dated April 12, 2021 that he married one of Kabuga’s children (Claudine Twagirihirwe) in 1995 and that they were now divorced. Do they have a right to claim compensation for the losses and damages they have suffered after the years in court trying to gain access to their accounts?

Robinson: There is no provision for claiming damages against the UN or ICTR. Even people who have been falsely imprisoned for years have been found to have no remedy.  The banks and countries involved in freezing the accounts will say that all they did was follow orders from the ICTR. At this stage, the only remedy is to get the funds back.

Previous Post

Karim Khan’s first speech as ICC Prosecutor

Next Post

Calls for reparation dominate debate at day for sexual violence survivors

Janet Sankale

Janet Sankale

Send me an Email

Related Posts

Ukrainian journalist Oksana Kovalenko and Afghan cartoonist Hossein Rezaye. The two described the challenges they encounter in the course of their work when they spoke at the Hague Talks at The Hague University of Applied Science on May 30, 2022.

From Kyiv to Kabul and Darfur: Challenges of reporting justice and human rights

June 22, 2022
Judge Miatta Maria Samba of the Trial Chamber III of the International Criminal Court (ICC) presiding over Kenyan lawyer Paul Gicheru's case. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Gicheru to attend court session remotely

June 16, 2022
Former Central African Republic rebel leader Mahamat Said Abdel Kani at the opening of his confirmation of charges hearing at the International Criminal Court in October 2021. Photo credit: @nICC-CPI

Said Abdel Kani to remain in custody as Appeals Chamber rejects his plea for release

May 25, 2022
Kenyan lawyer Paul Gicheru and his lawyer. Michael G. Karnavas, during the hearing of his case at the International Criminal Court in The Hague. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Parties prepare to wind up Gicheru case

May 20, 2022
Michael G. Karnavas, the lead counsel of Kenyan lawyer Paul Gicheru, during the opening of his trial at the International Criminal Court. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Gicheru asks ICC judge to admit new evidence

May 3, 2022
Cyril Laucci, the lead counsel of former Janjaweed commander Ali-Abd-Al-Rahman, during the opening of his trial at the International Criminal Court. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Abd-Al-Rahman paid Janjaweed, witness tells judges

April 27, 2022
Next Post
Calls for reparation dominate debate at day for sexual violence survivors

Calls for reparation dominate debate at day for sexual violence survivors

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • From Kyiv to Kabul and Darfur: Challenges of reporting justice and human rights
  • Gicheru to attend court session remotely
  • After euphoria of state white paper, victims now demand action on Jammeh
  • Right the Wrongs: Spotlight on the 2020 General Election in Tanzania
  • Selective approach to TRRC recommendations a sure recipe for defeating justice

Recent Comments

  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Kenyan lawyer denies bribery charges at the ICC
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on You did me wrong, Bemba tells ICC as he demands 70 million euros
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Two victims’ lawyers in Kenyatta case in line to become next ICC prosecutor
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Profiles of the four people shortlisted for the job of ICC Prosecutor
  • Write My Essay on Afghanistan case fails to take off at the ICC — pragmatism’ or surrender to the powerful?

Archives

Categories

JFJ – Journalists for Justice

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Browse by Topics:

Archives by Month:

Never Again
INTAHE
BarometreVerite
The Victims' Bantaba
No Result
View All Result
  • Confronting Impunity
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Login

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz