Resources
Friday, May 27, 2022
  • Login
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result

Browse by Topic:

  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result
Home ASP

Starvation of civilians is a war crime, no matter the type of conflict

Journalists For JusticebyJournalists For Justice
November 30, 2019
in ASP, Commentary, ICC Cases, Opinion
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
0
Starvation of civilians is a war crime, no matter the type of conflict

Children displaced by fighting in North Kivu, DRC 2007

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By Thomas Verfuss in The Hague

Is starving civilians in a civil war “less bad” than starving civilians in a war between states?

Switzerland proposes to make the intentional starvation of civilians as a method of warfare a crime in all armed conflicts. Until now, according to Article 8 of the Rome Statute, the founding treaty of the International Criminal Court (ICC), intentional starvation of civilians is a crime only when committed in an international armed conflict.

The Swiss proposal, on the table during the session of the Assembly of States Parties (ASP) to the Rome Statute in December 2019, seeks to put an end to an artificial distinction: the laws of war tend to protect civilians and prisoners of war only against the military of other states, not against their own army. States traditionally tend to protect their sovereignty against foreign or international interference. In the 1990s, during the early years of international criminal justice, the chief prosecutor of an international tribunal once quipped: “It is not forbidden for a state to kill its own citizens.”

A first step to protect vulnerable human beings, like civilians, prisoners of war and the shipwrecked, also during civil wars was done in 1949 when the Geneva Conventions were reformed and common Article 3 was introduced, with at least some minimum guarantees.

RelatedStories

Gicheru witness tampering trial starts before the ICC

Trial Chamber VI to hear Said Abdel Kani case

Court turns down bid to introduce elusive witness’s testimony, but allows four other statements

As the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), guardian and interpreter of international humanitarian law, notes:
“Among the many important advances in international humanitarian law wrought by the adoption of the 1949 Geneva Conventions, Article 3 stands out in particular. With its inclusion, States agreed for the first time on regulating, in an international treaty framework, what they described as ‘armed conflict not of an international character’.Common Article 3 represented one of the first provisions of international law that dealt with what was at the time considered by States as being exclusively their domestic affair. The provision is common to the four Geneva Conventions.” [1]

After a shy beginning in 1949, additional steps were taken in 1977, with additional protocols to the Geneva Conventions, to improve the protection of civilians also in civil wars. But as the ICRC notes:
“The fear that the Protocol might affect State sovereignty, prevent governments from effectively maintaining law and order within their borders and that it might be invoked to justify outside intervention led to the decision of the Diplomatic Conference at its fourth session to shorten and simplify the Protocol. Instead of the 47 Articles proposed by the ICRC the Conference adopted only 28. “[2]

When the Geneva Conventions were applied at the first contemporaneous international court, the UN tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) set up in 1993, prosecutors often struggled to prove the existence of an international armed conflict, because certain actions were a crime in international wars, but were not punishable in a civil war.

But still, though they could observe the ICTY cases, diplomats at the conference in 1998 finalising the Rome Statute chose to maintain the distinction.

These days the world sees many civil wars where terrible atrocities are committed in countries like Yemen and Syria, where hunger is an important and tragic part of the daily lives of many citizens. Using starvation as an intentional method of warfare should be a crime in all armed conflicts, no matter whether it is used in an international or internal character. The Swiss proposal is a first step to eliminate an artificial and unjustified distinction.

The FIDH, a federation of leading human rights organisations that has done a lot of work on the francophone ICC situation countries in Africa, supports the Swiss amendment and notes: “The absence of the crime of starvation in non-international armed conflicts from Article 8 of the Rome Statute, despite its recognition as a crime during an international armed conflict, creates an unjustifiable legal vacuum. This is deeply troubling as instances of starvation frequently occur in conflicts that are non-international in nature. Examples of starvation being used as a weapon of war are numerous and growing in their magnitude and devastating effects on already vulnerable populations.”[3]


[1] https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/Comment.xsp?action=openDocument&documentId=59F6CDFA490736C1C1257F7D004BA0EC

[2] https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/Treaty.xsp?documentId=AA0C5BCBAB5C4A85C12563CD002D6D09&action=openDocument

[3] https://www.fidh.org/IMG/pdf/asp743aweb.pdf

Previous Post

ICC victim fund drags feet in Kenya case, causing worry

Next Post

Cover-up fears in the collapse of Kenya ICC cases as key lawyers deny being contacted

Journalists For Justice

Journalists For Justice

Related Posts

Kenyan lawyer Paul Gicheru at the opening of his trial at the International Criminal Court on February 15, 2022. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Gicheru witness tampering trial starts before the ICC

February 16, 2022
Mr Said during the opening of the confirmation of charges hearing at the seat of the Court in The Hague (The Netherlands) on 12 October 2021 ©ICC-CPI

Trial Chamber VI to hear Said Abdel Kani case

December 20, 2021
Paul Gicheru appearing before the ICC via video-link from the ICC Detention Centre on 6 November 2020. Photo credit: ICC-CPI

Court turns down bid to introduce elusive witness’s testimony, but allows four other statements

December 17, 2021
Assembly of State Parties annual session. Photo Credit: @ICC-CPI

Election of deputy prosecutors and review report high on agenda of ICC Assembly of States Parties session

December 3, 2021
Empty seats in one of the two big plenary halls (accessible only via limited badges and special tickets for NGO observers) on Day 2. (Credit: Shirleen Chin)

COP26 failed to deliver, so ICC and ICJ the next stop for seekers of climate justice

December 2, 2021
Special Criminal Court Arrests CAR Minister Bouba for War Crimes. Photo: News Central TV

Pressure mounts for CAR minister to face justice

December 2, 2021
Next Post
Cover-up fears in the collapse of Kenya ICC cases as key lawyers deny being contacted

Cover-up fears in the collapse of Kenya ICC cases as key lawyers deny being contacted

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • Said Abdel Kani to remain in custody as Appeals Chamber rejects his plea for release
  • Are we ready? CSOs audit Kenya’s election preparedness
  • Parties prepare to wind up Gicheru case
  • Hope at last for Kenyan victims, but is TFV’s planned support enough?
  • Gicheru asks ICC judge to admit new evidence

Recent Comments

  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Kenyan lawyer denies bribery charges at the ICC
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on You did me wrong, Bemba tells ICC as he demands 70 million euros
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Two victims’ lawyers in Kenyatta case in line to become next ICC prosecutor
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Profiles of the four people shortlisted for the job of ICC Prosecutor
  • Write My Essay on Afghanistan case fails to take off at the ICC — pragmatism’ or surrender to the powerful?

Archives

Categories

JFJ – Journalists for Justice

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Browse by Topics:

Archives by Month:

Never Again
INTAHE
BarometreVerite
The Victims' Bantaba
No Result
View All Result
  • Confronting Impunity
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Login

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz