Resources
Thursday, May 26, 2022
  • Login
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result

Browse by Topic:

  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result
Home Human Rights

Tanzania cuts vital news source for citizens

Journalists for JusticebyJournalists for Justice
May 16, 2016
in Human Rights
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
0

Tanzania's President elect John Pombe Magufuli (R) and outgoing President Jakaya Kikwete share a moment before addressing members of the ruling Chama Cha Mapinduzi Party (CCM) at the party's sub-head office on Lumumba road in Dar es Salaam, October 30, 2015. Tanzania's ruling party candidate, John Magufuli, was declared winner on Thursday of a presidential election, after the national electoral body dismissed opposition complaints about the process and a demand for a recount. The election has been the most hotly contested race in the more than half a century of rule by the Chama Cha Mapinduzi Party, which fielded Magufuli, 56, a minister for public works. REUTERS/Emmanuel Herman - RTX1TYEI

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Journalists in Tanzania have protested last month’s move by the government to ban live coverage of parliamentary proceedings.

The move, announced by Information Minister Nape Nnauye in January, has also led to protests from the opposition party, who said they view the decision to stop live broadcasts of parliamentary debates as tantamount to censorship.

When Nnauye announced details of the ban in Parliament on January 27, he said that the live broadcast of parliamentary proceedings by the state broadcaster, Tanzania Broadcasting Corporation, cost too much, according to news accounts. At press conference on February 2, Nnauye said that the service cost the state broadcaster $2.1 million a year. Opposition parties dismissed the argument that the service was halted because of costs and offered to pay for the service, but their offer was rejected the media reported.

Live broadcasts of parliamentary proceedings, which air for about four hours a day while parliament is in session, are popular in Tanzania. In a country where the ruling party has held power for more than half a century, the broadcasts are viewed as a rare outlet where the relatively small, but lively opposition can hold the government to account and citizens get an unvarnished version of government matters being discussed by parliamentarians.

Instead of a full broadcast of proceedings, the parliament’s press team will distribute selected highlights to TV stations at the close of a day’s session, according to press accounts.

Absalom Kibanda, an editor with the independent New Habari newspaper and a former chairman of the Tanzania Editors Forum, told CPJ there was little trust that selected highlights would accurately reflect the proceedings. He said that the government’s move was widely viewed as an attempt to stifle press freedom.

RelatedStories

Speaking truth to power through cartoons

Influencing change in Africa, one cartoon at a time

Indictment of Gambian death squad member ‘vital for justice’

“Live broadcast of parliamentary proceedings is one of the most important avenues through which the people can see their elected representatives holding cabinet ministers and government officials to account. The government has however never been comfortable with this and has tried to ban the broadcasts several times before, and we are very disappointed that they have carried through with their threats this time,” he said.

At a news conference about the decision on April 24, Theophil Makunga, chairman of the Tanzania Editors Forum, said: “We condemn the decision for it has denied people their rights to information … To prohibit cameras in the debating chamber is an open strategy to violate freedom of press.”

Ayub Rioba, the managing director of the Tanzania Broadcasting Corporation, which provided the live feed, did not immediately respond to CPJ’s request for comment.

The BBC reported that since the coverage was halted members of parliament have been recording parliamentary debates on their mobile phones and uploading the footage to social media. A petition has also been set up on  Change.org, urging the government to reverse the decision.

Parliament, which is dominated by the ruling party Chama Cha Mapinduzi (Party of the Revolution), has tried to halt the service before. In February 2013, it announced that live broadcasts would be replaced with footage recorded and edited by parliamentary authorities, according to press accounts. Officials backtracked after protests by journalist groups, including the Media Council of Tanzania. On that occasion, the cost of the service was not cited as an issue.

Although President John Magufuli, who came into office in October 2015, and his administration have been praised for its anti-corruption drive, the government has taken measures to limit media freedom. CPJ reported in January on the closure of a weekly Swahili-language newspaper, Mawio, which was shut down after it reported on the political crisis in the Tanzanian archipelago of Zanzibar. In March, a journalist was abducted and beaten by unknown assailants while reporting on an election in Zanzibar, which was boycotted by the opposition.

By regional standards, Tanzania’s press is relatively free but the new government has not taken steps to repeal restrictive media laws including the Statistics Act endorsed in 2015, which proposes penalties for any journalist publishing inaccurate “unofficial” data, according to news reports.

Neville Meena, secretary of the Tanzania Editors Forum, said that editors were seeking a meeting with parliamentary authorities to seek to reverse the decision halting live broadcasts.

Previous Post

Former Rwandese mayors on trial in France over genocide

Next Post

Updates from the ICC

Journalists for Justice

Journalists for Justice

Related Posts

Nakuru residents at the “Justice Through African Eyes” cartoon exhibition at the Nakuru Social Hall on March 31, 2022. Photo credit: @Waceke Njoroge

Speaking truth to power through cartoons

April 6, 2022
From left: Media and communications expert Kimani wa Wanjiru, journalist Tom Odhiambo, cartoonist Celestine Wamiru (Celeste), and syndicated political cartoonist Godfrey Mwampembwa (Gado) participate in a panel discussion during the launch of the second edition of the "Justice Through African Eyes" cartoon exhibition at the Kenya Cultural Centre’s Cheche Gallery on March 16, 2022. Photo credit: JFJ

Influencing change in Africa, one cartoon at a time

March 19, 2022
Former Gambian 'death squad' member charged in Germany. Photo credit: @standard.gm

Indictment of Gambian death squad member ‘vital for justice’

March 4, 2022
Fatou Bensouda and two commissioners appointed by the UNHRC to investigate allegations of violations and abuses of human rights, and humanitarian and refugee law in Ethiopia committed since November 3, 2020

Former ICC Prosecutor to lead Ethiopia human rights probe

March 3, 2022
Photo credit: Twitter

Breaking the silence: Justice seen through Africa’s cartoons

February 22, 2022
Prosper Bazombanza, Vice President of the Republic of Burundi, addresses the General Assembly. UN Photo/Cia Pak

Burundi asked to investigate Gitega prison fire

February 7, 2022
Next Post

Updates from the ICC

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • Said Abdel Kani to remain in custody as Appeals Chamber rejects his plea for release
  • Are we ready? CSOs audit Kenya’s election preparedness
  • Parties prepare to wind up Gicheru case
  • Hope at last for Kenyan victims, but is TFV’s planned support enough?
  • Gicheru asks ICC judge to admit new evidence

Recent Comments

  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Kenyan lawyer denies bribery charges at the ICC
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on You did me wrong, Bemba tells ICC as he demands 70 million euros
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Two victims’ lawyers in Kenyatta case in line to become next ICC prosecutor
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Profiles of the four people shortlisted for the job of ICC Prosecutor
  • Write My Essay on Afghanistan case fails to take off at the ICC — pragmatism’ or surrender to the powerful?

Archives

Categories

JFJ – Journalists for Justice

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Browse by Topics:

Archives by Month:

Never Again
INTAHE
BarometreVerite
The Victims' Bantaba
No Result
View All Result
  • Confronting Impunity
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Login

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz