Resources
Sunday, February 28, 2021
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Confronting Impunity
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion
  • About US
  • Our Work
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
  • Home
  • Confronting Impunity
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion
  • About US
  • Our Work
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result
Home ASP

Will the ICC bow to the political pressure in Afghanistan?

Susan Kendi by Susan Kendi
January 22, 2020
in ASP, Commentary, Headline, Opinion and Analysis, Top Story
5 min read
1
Will the ICC bow to the political pressure in Afghanistan?

Afghanistan Lawyer making submissions in Court during the Appeal Chamber hearings held in December 2019

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By Susan Kendi

The International Criminal Court judges will in due course give a landmark ruling on the prosecutor’s request to open an investigation into the alleged crimes committed in the conflict between the United States (U.S.) troops, Afghan forces and the Taliban in Afghanistan.

RelatedPosts

Khan’s supporters welcome his election, but his critics still wary due to his role in Kenya case

States must take the time to choose the right ICC Prosecutor

First time in history: a vote on who becomes new ICC Prosecutor

The decision is a real test to gauge whether the Court will stand up to political meddling and rule in accordance with the Rome Statute.

The Afghanistan government has requested the court to stay away and allow the country to investigate and prosecute cases, emphasizing that an International Crimes Division has been established and national laws reformed to ensure that cases of torture are addressed, and justice is served.

In their submission, the representatives of the country stated that an ICC investigation is a “waste of resources” which would be redirected in support of the existing national judicial system. They added that an investigation would “paralyze national and international efforts to forge peace” in the country.

The capability of Afghanistan to investigate and prosecute past and ongoing atrocities committed is questionable.

The attacks against judges, prosecutors and police have continued and worsened in the country proving that the possibility of an investigation in the country is close to impossible.

Hundreds of thousands have been killed, many wounded and maimed and others displaced in in the 40 years of conflict and violence in Afghanistan.

Till now, only low-level perpetrators have been tried and the promises told to the Afghan victims of “peace first then justice” remain futile.

Apart from its volatile nature, the Afghanistan national judicial systems are prone to interference by the government, the Taliban and other outside forces.

“The reality is that conflict has turned Afghanistan into a breeding ground for fundamentalist and extremist groups and a battleground for regional and international powers… The reality is that there are no discussions concerning justice and accountability as part of the United States negotiations with the Taliban,” said a lawyer of the Afghanistan Human Rights Organization (AHRO).

In December 2019, the Washington Post acquired 2,000 pages of confidential United States government documents revealing that senior U.S. officials lied about progress in the Afghanistan war and analyzing the root failures of the Afghanistan.

The United States invaded Afghanistan after the September 11,2001 attacks. The move aimed at expelling the Al-Qaeda and denying them a safe base of operations by removing the Taliban from power.

According to the defence department figures, the counterterrorism operations in Afghanistan has cost the lives of 2,300 U.S. soldiers and left 20,589 wounded. 

On April 2019, the Pre-Trial chamber II unanimously rejected the prosecutor’s request to authorise an investigation in the territory of Afghanistan stating that an investigation at that stage would not serve the “interests of justice.”

The Court’s decision has not stopped United States efforts to paralyze any move that might see American forces in Afghanistan implicated in the alleged crimes committed since May 1, 2003 to 2004.

Afghanistan is a state party to the Rome Statute whereas the United States of America is a signatory but has not ratified it since 2000.This means that the Rome Statute is not legally binding to the U.S.

One of U.S president Donald Trump’s lawyers, Jay Sekulow alongside other lawyers from the American Center for Law and Justice allowed as friends of the court defended the U.S military efforts and contested Fatou Bensouda’s request.

“Our troops face an insidious new threat as the International Criminal Court’s prosecutor is seeking jurisdiction to prosecute our soldiers on war crimes after they have risked their lives fighting the war on terror,” said Sekulow.

On April 5,2019 the United States government revoked Fatou Bensouda’s entry visa into the country and 12 days later the Pre-Trial chamber II unanimously rejected her request to authorise an investigation in Afghanistan.

Two years ago, the United States national Security adviser, John Bolton vehemently threatened ICC judges and prosecutors during his speech to the Federalist society in Washington DC, stating that they would face individual criminal charges, arrests and economic sanctions if they dared charge any American service member.

“If the Court comes after us, Israel or other US allies, we will not sit quietly…We will ban its [ICC] judges and prosecutors from entering the United States. We will sanction their funds in the US financial system, and we will prosecute them in the US criminal system. We will do the same for any company or state that assists an ICC investigation of Americans,” John Bolton said

“We will let the ICC die on its own. After all, for all intents and purposes, the ICC is already dead to us,” he added.

The world is watching the politics play out in the Afghanistan situation at a distance and for International law experts, opening an investigation into the United States Torture program and alleged crimes committed by the U.S. forces will show that no one is above the law and brush off critics that have termed the court as a neo-colonial and accused it of targeting African countries.

Previous Post

Hope as South Sudanese Government, rebels agree to peace deal

Next Post

Situation in South Sudan

Related Posts

The newly elected ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan

Khan’s supporters welcome his election, but his critics still wary due to his role in Kenya case

by Millicent Zighe
February 22, 2021

...

The International Criminal Court (ICC) states parties convene at the World Forum Convention Center in The Hague from December 5-12, 2018, for the 17th session of the Assembly of state parties Credit: The ASP Flickr account

States must take the time to choose the right ICC Prosecutor

by Journalists For Justice
February 11, 2021

...

First time in history: a vote on who becomes new ICC Prosecutor

First time in history: a vote on who becomes new ICC Prosecutor

by Thomas Verfuss
February 10, 2021

...

African NGOs strongly advise for or against Khan as new ICC chief prosecutor

States split between Karim Khan and Fergal Gaynor for ICC Prosecutor

by Millicent Zighe
February 7, 2021

...

Kenyan Lawyer, Paul Gicheru makes first appearance before the ICC

Paul Gicheru gives exclusive interview to Kenyan newspaper

by Susan Kendi
February 7, 2021

...

123 states in search of new prosecutor

123 states in search of new prosecutor

by Thomas Verfuss
February 5, 2021

...

Next Post
Situation in South Sudan

Situation in South Sudan

1
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
Connect with
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
1 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
0 Comment authors
Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
trackback
JFJ - Journalists for Justice

[…] of the ICC declined in April 2019 to permit the opening of an investigation into the situation in Afghanistan “in the interests of justice”. Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda appealed that decision; her appeal was […]

Vote Up0Vote Down 
11 months ago

FollowJFJustice

JFJ – Journalists for Justice

We call out impunity and raise victim voices to demand accountability for atrocity crimes wherever they occur.

Follow Us

Archives

Our Microsites

Never Again
INTAHE
BarometreVerite
The Point
No Result
View All Result
  • Confronting Impunity
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion
  • About US
  • Our Work

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz