Resources
Thursday, May 26, 2022
  • Login
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result

Browse by Topic:

  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result
Home The ICC

Gulu will not host Ongwen trial just yet, ICC judges rule

Journalists for JusticebyJournalists for Justice
July 28, 2016
in The ICC
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
0
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

International Criminal Court Outreach Coordinator, Maria Kamara, with some of the victims in the Dominic Ongwen case during one of the public meetings. 

Dominic Ong’wen’s trial for 70 crimes against humanity charges at the International Criminal Court (ICC) will not begin in Uganda, after all.

Prosecutors and defense counsel and victims’ legal representatives had suggested that opening statements in the case be presented in Gulu, northern Uganda, the scene of the atrocities committed by the Lord’s Assistant Army for which Ongwen has been charged. Trial Chamber IX rejected the request and also declined to authorize a court a site visit before hearing starts in December 2016.

Pre-Trial Chamber II last year confirmed all the 70 crimes against humanity and war crimes charges against Ong’wen. Although the judges acknowledged the importance of bringing justice closer to the affected communities, they nevertheless ruled that holding the opening statements of the trial in Uganda was not desirable, citing security concerns and logistical challenges.

“The Chamber considers that the combination of security concerns (including, as stated by the common legal representative of victims, with respect to Ong’wen’s prospective presence in Uganda and the victims’ ensuing fear of possible episodes of violence) and logistical difficulties (noting also the judicial workload of the Chamber’s individual Judges in other situations and cases before the Court) militates against making a recommendation to the Presidency to hold the opening of the trial in situ,” Presiding Judge Betram Schmitt said.

RelatedStories

Said Abdel Kani to remain in custody as Appeals Chamber rejects his plea for release

Parties prepare to wind up Gicheru case

Gicheru asks ICC judge to admit new evidence

Trial Chamber IX also raised doubts about whether a judicial site visit to northern Uganda would be of material assistance to its evaluation of the evidence.

Although it is not cited as part of the decision, there are reports of the resurgence of LRA, which is said to have killed 100,000 people and abducted over 60, 000 since it was formed in the 1980s as a movement to oppose President Yoweri Museveni’s rule. 

Ongwen’s former militia leader, Joseph Kony, is on the run since the ICC issued a warrant of arrest against him in 2005. It is said that Kony considers Ong’wen’s surrender to the US army in 2015 as an act of betrayal. Ong’wen served in LRA ranks for 30 years since his abduction as a 10-year-old boy, and rose to become a brigadier commanding some of the expeditions against his home villages.

Read: Justice in the Neighborhood: How in situ Hearings in Uganda Can(not) Benefit Victim Communities in Northern Uganda.

After his surrender and arrest, Ong’wen was handed over to the ICC in 2015. The ICC Prosecutor has divided the charges against him into seven categories. Ong’wen faces a total of 45 counts of crimes against humanity and war crimes for attacks on four camps of people who were displaced from their homes in northern Uganda between 2002 and 2005. The camps attacked were Abok, Lukodi, Odek, and Pajule.

Additionally, Ong’wen is facing charges for sexual and gender-based crimes.

Although the Rome Statute, the treaty that founded the ICC, provides for in situ heatings and site visits, the court has so far not been able to employ their use.

Judges declined requests for in situ hearings in Kenya or Arusha, Tanzania, by Uhuru Kenyatta and William Ruto when they were facing crimes against humanity charges in connection with the post-2007 election violence. Judges declined to grant the requests citing concerns over witness intimidation and tampering.

 Read: Victim and perpetrator: Why Ongwen’s case is a unique one

Previous Post

Hostility towards journalists on the rise in South Sudan

Next Post

Burundi’s government youth wing accused of gang rape

Journalists for Justice

Journalists for Justice

Related Posts

Former Central African Republic rebel leader Mahamat Said Abdel Kani at the opening of his confirmation of charges hearing at the International Criminal Court in October 2021. Photo credit: @nICC-CPI

Said Abdel Kani to remain in custody as Appeals Chamber rejects his plea for release

May 25, 2022
Kenyan lawyer Paul Gicheru and his lawyer. Michael G. Karnavas, during the hearing of his case at the International Criminal Court in The Hague. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Parties prepare to wind up Gicheru case

May 20, 2022
Michael G. Karnavas, the lead counsel of Kenyan lawyer Paul Gicheru, during the opening of his trial at the International Criminal Court. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Gicheru asks ICC judge to admit new evidence

May 3, 2022
Cyril Laucci, the lead counsel of former Janjaweed commander Ali-Abd-Al-Rahman, during the opening of his trial at the International Criminal Court. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Abd-Al-Rahman paid Janjaweed, witness tells judges

April 27, 2022
Judge Miatta Maria Samba of the International Criminal Court’s Trial Chamber III during the opening of the case of the Prosecutor v Paul Gicheru on February 15, 2022. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Gicheru opposes prosecution bid to introduce ‘fresh’ evidence

April 15, 2022
Former Central African Republic rebel leader Maxime Jeoffroy Eli Mokom Gawaka arrives at the International Criminal Court in The Hague on March 22, 2022 for his first appearance. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Khan wants Mokom to have access to Yekatom-Ngaïssona trial materials

April 13, 2022
Next Post

Burundi's government youth wing accused of gang rape

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • Said Abdel Kani to remain in custody as Appeals Chamber rejects his plea for release
  • Are we ready? CSOs audit Kenya’s election preparedness
  • Parties prepare to wind up Gicheru case
  • Hope at last for Kenyan victims, but is TFV’s planned support enough?
  • Gicheru asks ICC judge to admit new evidence

Recent Comments

  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Kenyan lawyer denies bribery charges at the ICC
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on You did me wrong, Bemba tells ICC as he demands 70 million euros
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Two victims’ lawyers in Kenyatta case in line to become next ICC prosecutor
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Profiles of the four people shortlisted for the job of ICC Prosecutor
  • Write My Essay on Afghanistan case fails to take off at the ICC — pragmatism’ or surrender to the powerful?

Archives

Categories

JFJ – Journalists for Justice

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Browse by Topics:

Archives by Month:

Never Again
INTAHE
BarometreVerite
The Victims' Bantaba
No Result
View All Result
  • Confronting Impunity
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Login

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz