• About US
  • Our Work
Friday, May 16, 2025
  • Login
Journalists For Justice (JFJ)
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists For Justice (JFJ)
No Result
View All Result

Judges reject Ruto attack on Bensouda’s witnesses

byJournalists for Justice
June 3, 2016
in The ICC
Reading Time: 2 mins read
16
A A
5
SHARES
53
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Whatsapp


Witnesses who testified against Deputy President William Ruto at the International Criminal Court can rest easy – for now – after judges rejected a request to appoint an independent prosecutor to investigate them for lying.

Ruto’s lawyers, led by Karim Khan, requested the judges who had been trying him for crimes against humanity to appoint an external prosecutor to investigate alleged witness tampering and interference by the Office of the Prosecution (OTP). The application, filed a month after the termination of the Ruto-Sang case because of what one judge called “intolerable levels of witness interference and political meddling”, claimed that there was reason to believe that several OTP witnesses and/or ICC staff members may have committed offences against the administration of justice.

Khan claimed intermediaries and officials in the OTP had tampered with the collection of evidence by identifying and coaching witnesses., and that ICC staff might have engaged in sexual relations with witnesses and their families, and were party to false financial claims made on the Victims and Witnesses Unit. Read more on: fresh-twist-as-ruto-lawyers-go-after-bensouda-s-witnesses

ICC Chief Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda dismissed the claims as reckless and salacious, and instead accused Ruto’s lawyers of making unsubstantiated claims about her office’s alleged interference with victims and the administration of justice. The Common Legal Representative for Victims, Wilfred Nderitu, opposed the Ruto lawyers’ application, especially the proposal to refer to Kenya a witness tampering cases against three Kenyans against whom warrants of arrest have been issued.

RelatedPosts

Dilemma of ICC-wanted Netanyahu’s visit high on the agenda of new leadership in Germany

ICC issues landmark policy to tackle slavery crimes

ICC Prosecutor requests official investigation of sexual harassment claims against him

Read more on: bensouda fires back at ruto team over a lying witness

The ICC has issued warrants of arrest against Walter Barasa, Paul Gicheru and Philip Kipkoech Bett for alleged witness interference in the Ruto-Sang case, which has been filed by the prosecution.

Judges yesterday dismissed the request by Ruto’s lawyers, saying it would be inappropriate for them to exercise jurisdiction on the merits of the case after they had terminated it, but added that the request could be filed elsewhere.

“As the Ruto Counsel’s application aims to initiate an investigation against certain targets, the proper forum for the applicants to bring their complaint would be the Pre-Trial Division,” reads the decision in part.

The three-judge bench consisting of Chile Eboe-Osuji (presiding), Robert Fremr and Herrero Carbuccia, also cautioned lawyers in the case against personalising their work.

“As a final observation, the Chamber notes the evident acrimony that permeated the parties’ submissions… The Chamber … reminds counsel that the dictates of professional responsibility require counsel to maintain detachment at all times from the case they are litigating,” the judges said. 

Share2Tweet1Send
Previous Post

Victim testimony enough to convict sexual violence crime, expert tells court

Next Post

So many rapes,yet so few convictions

Next Post

So many rapes,yet so few convictions

Please login to join discussion

Recent Posts

  • Dilemma of ICC-wanted Netanyahu’s visit high on the agenda of new leadership in Germany
  • Michael Correa’s US conviction brings into sharp focus the slow pace of transitional justice in The Gambia
  • Genocide marks 31 years and the clock is ticking for six Rwandans held in Niger
  • Impunity continues to rob Sudanese victims of peace and justice
  • No easy road to ICC justice for Kenya’s victims of abduction and extrajudicial killing

About

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Twitter Facebook Instagram LinkedIn

Archives by Month:

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.