Resources
Friday, May 27, 2022
  • Login
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result

Browse by Topic:

  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result
Home Victim Voices Kenya

Kenyan SGBV victims wait with bated breath for Thursday’s judgment

Journalists For JusticebyJournalists For Justice
December 8, 2020
in Commentary, Domestic Court Cases, Kenyan Cases, Opinion, SGBV, Victim Networks, Victim Voices
Reading Time: 7 mins read
A A
0
Survivors of sexual violence that occured after the December 2007 presidential election gather at the Milimani Law Courts in Nairobi, Kenya during a hearing into a constitutional petiton they filed. The High Court is scheduled to deliver a judgment on that petition on Thursday, December 10, 2020. Credit: Physicians for Human Rights (PHR).

Survivors of sexual violence that occured after the December 2007 presidential election gather at the Milimani Law Courts in Nairobi, Kenya during a hearing into a constitutional petiton they filed. The High Court is scheduled to deliver a judgment on that petition on Thursday, December 10, 2020. Credit: Physicians for Human Rights (PHR)

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

This week, as commemoration of the 16 Days of Activism against Gender-Based Violence approaches its peak, thousands of victims of sexual violence committed during the 2007-08 post-election violence (PEV) in Kenya will be holding their breath in anticipation of the delivery of a judgment in a landmark case in the High Court in Nairobi. The case was filed in 2013 by six female victims who were gang raped by militia and state security officers, and two male victims who suffered forced circumcision in the hands of ethnic militia, during the PEV, with the support of four non-governmental organizations.

This seminal case, filed as a constitutional petition, seeks to hold the government of Kenya legally responsible for human rights violations suffered by victims as a result of its institutions’ failures to effectively prevent and respond to PEV-related sexual violence.

Regrettably, the case has dragged on in court for more than seven years, in which the petitioners have been subjected to inefficiencies of a judicial system characterised by systemic challenges including huge case backlogs, undue delays and adjournments, ad hoc transfer of judicial officers and the lack of a predictable and effective system to ensure seamless and timely continuity of cases. Delays in the court proceedings, in the hands of five different judges, have been a source of re-traumatization for many victims, who have invested significant hope in the outcome of the case following other failed justice processes including the stalled implementation of reparation measures provided in the 2013 report of the Truth Justice and Reconciliation Commission. Thus, with the judgment now scheduled to be delivered on International Human Rights Day, 10th December 2020, there is a glimmer of hope that victims of PEV-related sexual violence may finally have justice.

The upcoming judgment is momentous and worth observing, not just for the affected victims, but also the larger Kenyan citizenry, for a number of reasons.

First, the judgment will be the culmination of a prolonged process that has had at its core the aim of eliciting formal recognition and acknowledgement of victims of sexual and gender-based violence, the harm and losses they have suffered, and their resulting needs, which have been overlooked since the PEV. Victims suffered horrendous forms of sexual violence including gang rape, defilement, genital mutilation, forced circumcision, sexual enslavement and sexual assault. In many instances, victims were abused in the presence of their children and spouses. Further, many women and girls conceived unwanted pregnancies and bore children from the brutal rapes that they suffered. Yet, for more than twelve years since the PEV, the State has obliviously remained silent as victims have continued to endure debilitating physical, psychological, sexual and reproductive health conditions, socio-economic losses, and layers of stigma and discrimination.

RelatedStories

Hope at last for Kenyan victims, but is TFV’s planned support enough?

For Jammeh, sexual violence was a weapon of repression and torture

With joy and tears, they welcomed truth commission’s verdict

Second, if the petitioners’ prayers are granted, the judgment will affirm that the government and its institutions can no longer be bystanders in the face of imminent or actual occurrence of sexual violence during election-related violence and other periods of conflict and civil strife. In the past, the government has adopted a reactive approach to reported incidences of election-related sexual violence once they have occurred and thrown up its arms in defeat, when victims are unable to themselves identify or lead them to perpetrators. The petitioners have asserted in the case, that the government must live up to its constitutional obligations to take proactive steps to establish social, legal, policy, administrative and institutional measures that can effectively prevent sexual violence during elections and provide appropriate emergency and long-term health care, psychosocial support, legal assistance and justice to affected victims.

The petitioners maintain that such measures should take into account the unique barriers and challenges encountered by victims of sexual violence during election-related conflict, including stigma and biases rooted in ethnic, socio-political and gender-based discrimination that fuels such violence in the first place. They would also like such measures to take into account the breakdown in infrastructure, law and order; and existing systemic gaps in the social, health and criminal justice sectors, which affect timely access to assistance measures and reporting by victims, as well as investigations and prosecution of perpetrators, including state security officers responsible for committing election-related sexual violations. To this end, the petitioners’ prayers include orders to compel the state to establish specific and practical measures that would go a long way in enhancing protection of women, girls, men and boys in communities that have repeatedly experienced SGBV during elections. These measures include enhanced training of law enforcement officers on lawful and human-rights based policing. They also include the establishment of an independent body or “internationalized special division” within the Office of the Directorate of Public Prosecutions for investigations and prosecution of PEV-related sexual violence, independent of the police, and capable of addressing patterns of crime that rise to the level of international crimes. Other measures the petitioners are asking for include the creation of a database of all victims of PEV-related SGBV, and to ensure that such victims are provided with appropriate, ongoing medical and psychosocial care, legal and social services. The petitioners also want the establishment of an independent body tomonitor the provision of reparations to victims of PEV-related SGBV; analyze and report on systemic deficiencies in the provision of effective remedies for SGBV victims; and periodically report to the court on the implementation of reparation measures.

Thirdly, the timing of the judgment is quite apt. It comes at a time when the Kenyan public has been engaged in a debate on the necessity, pros and cons of reopening the discourse on accountability for PEV-related violations. This has been triggered by the recent announcement of the Director of Criminal Investigations on reopening of PEV-related investigations following reports of renewed ethnic-based undercurrents and threats in communities affected by the PEV, and lawyer Paul Gicheru’s surrender to the International Criminal Court to face charges of interference with witnesses in previous trials involving Deputy President William Ruto. In response, the political elite have declared that they have reconciled and no one should be allowed to reopen wounds and the dark past of the PEV. Furthermore, reforms proposed through the Building Bridges Initiative have been fronted as the antidote to future election-related violence. Thus, many have questioned why victims cannot, therefore, just forgive, forget and move on.

However, regardless of its outcome, the anticipated judgment should spur us, collectively, as the Kenyan society to pause and reflect on the implications of our failure to meaningfully and conclusively deal with the consequences of the PEV and other historical injustices. Notably, while political elites form convenient coalitions under the guise of reconciliation, our citizens who have borne the price of political violence with their lives and those of their loved ones have been stuck in time, unable to move forward under the weight of encumbering social, economic and health conditions and losses. How can we morally or rationally demand of them to move forward without as much as some form of recognition or redress for their losses? What does our collective stance toward PEV victims say about our national ethos and constitutional obligations to protect the lives and human rights of every person, even the lowest amongst us? We owe PEV victims a moral and legal obligation to acknowledge and provide reparation for the harm they have suffered.

Furthermore, as our own experience and that of numerous countries around the world demonstrate, continued delay to address the consequences of PEV and past political violence, denies the country the opportunity to challenge impunity, understand and effectively address root causes of such violence, and forge national healing and cohesion with the participation of all citizens, including affected victims and communities. To illustrate, lack of accountability for past violence and the State’s failure to plug systemic legal and institutional gaps resulted in renewed violence, including widespread sexual violence, during the 2017 elections. It is only logical that if the Kenyan State continues to bury its head in the sand, a similar cycle of violence is expected in the 2022 General Election. As we mark this International Human Rights Day, let us be reminded that sustainable peace will only be achieved through a deliberate and genuine effort, with political commitment and leadership from the highest level of the Presidency, to confront past injustices and provide redress and reparation to victims affected by political violence. Such sustainable peace will also only be achieved if a deliberate and genuine effort is made to dismantle sex, gender, ethnic, social, regional and other bases of discrimination and marginalization, which fuel persisting tensions, divisions and cycles of election-related violence and gross human rights violations in Kenya.

Christine Alai is a human rights lawyer and transitional justice expert who has been involved in the 2013 constitutional petition filed by PEV sexual violence victims.

Previous Post

The Trust Fund for Victims’ unfulfilled promises in Kenya

Next Post

Search for the next ICC Prosecutor makes little progress

Journalists For Justice

Journalists For Justice

Related Posts

Elizabeth Atieno, a survivor of the 2007/2008 post-election violence in Kenya and also an advocate against sexual violence, speaks in Nairobi during a function to mark the seventh International Day for the Elimination of Sexual Violence in Conflict in June 2021. Photo Credit: Twitter

Hope at last for Kenyan victims, but is TFV’s planned support enough?

May 11, 2022
Former beauty pageant winner Fatou Jallow aka Toufa. The TRRC recommends that former president Yahya Jammeh should be procusecuted for raping her. Photo credit: Jason Florio and Helen Florio from Gambia- Victims and Resisters.

For Jammeh, sexual violence was a weapon of repression and torture

February 16, 2022
Zainab, the sister of Lt Lowe who disappeared after being accused of plotting to overthrow Yahya Jammeh in 2006, speaking during the release of the TRRC report to the public on December 24,2021.

With joy and tears, they welcomed truth commission’s verdict

January 7, 2022
Paul Gicheru appearing before the ICC via video-link from the ICC Detention Centre on 6 November 2020. Photo credit: ICC-CPI

Court turns down bid to introduce elusive witness’s testimony, but allows four other statements

December 17, 2021
Tanzania former President John Pombe Magufuli. Photo: Charles Onyango- Obbo Twitter

Victory for human rights as Tanzania allows young mothers back in school

December 15, 2021
The TRRC recommends the prosecution of Yahya Jammeh and several senior officials in his administration for their role in committing rape and other forms of SGBV.

Human rights groups join growing call for prosecution of Yahya Jammeh

December 10, 2021
Next Post
ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda (right) speaks with another prosecutor on 28 August 2018 during the closing statements in the case against former Congolese rebel leader Bosco Ntaganda at the International Criminal Court in The Hague, Netherlands. Bensouda's term ends in June 2021 and the process to elect her successor is ongoing.

Search for the next ICC Prosecutor makes little progress

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • Said Abdel Kani to remain in custody as Appeals Chamber rejects his plea for release
  • Are we ready? CSOs audit Kenya’s election preparedness
  • Parties prepare to wind up Gicheru case
  • Hope at last for Kenyan victims, but is TFV’s planned support enough?
  • Gicheru asks ICC judge to admit new evidence

Recent Comments

  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Kenyan lawyer denies bribery charges at the ICC
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on You did me wrong, Bemba tells ICC as he demands 70 million euros
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Two victims’ lawyers in Kenyatta case in line to become next ICC prosecutor
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Profiles of the four people shortlisted for the job of ICC Prosecutor
  • Write My Essay on Afghanistan case fails to take off at the ICC — pragmatism’ or surrender to the powerful?

Archives

Categories

JFJ – Journalists for Justice

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Browse by Topics:

Archives by Month:

Never Again
INTAHE
BarometreVerite
The Victims' Bantaba
No Result
View All Result
  • Confronting Impunity
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Login

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz