Resources
Wednesday, August 10, 2022
  • Login
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result

Browse by Topic:

  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
  • Virtual Exhibition
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
  • Virtual Exhibition
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result
Home ICJ

Ukraine obtains victory over Russia at the ICJ

Thomas VerfussbyThomas Verfuss
March 17, 2022
in ICJ, Tribunal
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
0
The President of the Court, H.E. Judge Joan E. Donoghue. Photo credit: @CIJ_ICJ

The President of the Court, H.E. Judge Joan E. Donoghue. Photo credit: @CIJ_ICJ

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The International Court of Justice has ordered Russia to immediately suspend its military operations in Ukraine.

The court order was read out in the Peace Palace in The Hague by International Court of Justice (ICJ) President Joan Donoghue on Wednesday, March 16, 2022.

The case concerning allegations of genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), brought by Ukraine, was a rather atypical use of the Genocide Convention. That international treaty was drafted and adopted in the 1940s, after World War II and its horrors: the Holocaust, or the Shoah in Hebrew, with concentration camps like Auschwitz and mass executions of Jews in Ukraine by the German troops under the command of dictator Adolf Hitler.

The convention aims at preventing genocide and punishing the perpetrators, if it still occurs. As for other international treaties, states can bring disputes about its violation or interpretation before the ICJ.

Such cases are typically brought against an alleged perpetrator by a “victim state”, like when Bosnia sued Yugoslavia in 1993. In 2019 there was a first: The Gambia sued a country in another continent, Myanmar, for the alleged genocide against an ethnic and religious group, the Rohingyas.

RelatedStories

ICJ to rule on Myanmar’s objections to The Gambia’s genocide case

Why Uganda is not happy to pay less in dispute with DRC

How innocent is innocent at international courts? – The plight of eight Rwandans

Russia alleges that Russian nationals and Russian-speaking people were victims of genocide in eastern Ukraine. So, according to the familiar pattern, one might have expected Russia to sue Ukraine before the ICJ.

Instead, it was the other way round: Russia used the alleged genocide as a pretext for the military intervention, and then Ukraine went to the ICJ. It submitted in its application that the alleged genocide does not give Russia the right to intervene militarily. If Moscow believes there is a genocide, it should address the matter at UN organs, such as the ICJ, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), or the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), Kiev submits. Ukraine says that Russia abused the prevention provision in the Genocide Convention.

The ICJ found that it has no evidence of genocide in Ukraine before it and that to prevent genocide, states may only act within the limits of international law. The ICJ also found that the indication of provisional matters is urgent because of the loss of life in Ukraine and the grave concern that the UNGA expressed about the humanitarian situation: numerous civilian deaths; destruction; and lack of food, water, and electricity.

The court order to Russia to suspend its military operations in Ukraine is a moral victory for Ukraine, though it was not unanimous: the Russian and Chinese judges voted against it. Unfortunately for the Ukrainians, the court order is not enforceable in case of non-observance. The ICJ, the principal judicial organ of the UN, has no police force of its own. In case of violation of the court order, the only recourse for Ukraine is to go to the UNSC, where Russia, with its veto, can prevent any coercive action against itself.

On February 26, 2022, two days after the Russian invasion started, Ukraine filed in the Registry of the court an application instituting proceeding against the Russian Federation concerning a dispute relating to the interpretation, application, and fulfilment of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.

The public hearing started and concluded on March 7, 2022, at the Peace Palace after Ukraine presented its single round of oral arguments. The Russian Federation did not attend the hearing. On that day, Ukraine sought an emergency order from the ICJ to halt hostilities on its territory.

After Wednesday’s urgent court order, a procedure on the merits of the case will follow. Such procedures at the ICJ usually take years.

Previous Post

ICC deputy prosecutors begin their nine-year term

Next Post

Influencing change in Africa, one cartoon at a time

Thomas Verfuss

Thomas Verfuss

Send Email

Related Posts

The International Court of Justice, which has its seat in The Hague, is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations. Photo Credit:@CIJ_ICJ

ICJ to rule on Myanmar’s objections to The Gambia’s genocide case

March 7, 2022
Troops of the government of Zaire (now Democratic Republic of the Congo) during the Second Congo Civil War. (Public Domain Image)

Why Uganda is not happy to pay less in dispute with DRC

February 14, 2022
Top row, from left: André Ntagerura, Protais Zigiranyirazo, Tharcisse Muvunyi, and Anatole Nsengiyumva. Bottom row: Alphonse Nteziryayo, Francois-Xavier Nzuwonemeye, Innocent Sagahutu, and Prosper Mugiraneza.

How innocent is innocent at international courts? – The plight of eight Rwandans

January 28, 2022
Félicien Kabuga. Photo Credit:@IRMCT

Parties invited to make submissions on Kabuga trial guidelines

December 24, 2021
Special Criminal Court Arrests CAR Minister Bouba for War Crimes. Photo: News Central TV

Pressure mounts for CAR minister to face justice

December 2, 2021
Hassan Bouba Ali (R) with Ali Darassa (C) surrounded by other UPC leaders, during a meeting at their headquarters in Alindao, October 2017. © 2017 Alexis Huguet Photo: Human Rights Watch

Release of war crimes suspect an assault on justice in CAR, says special court

November 27, 2021
Next Post
From left: Media and communications expert Kimani wa Wanjiru, journalist Tom Odhiambo, cartoonist Celestine Wamiru (Celeste), and syndicated political cartoonist Godfrey Mwampembwa (Gado) participate in a panel discussion during the launch of the second edition of the "Justice Through African Eyes" cartoon exhibition at the Kenya Cultural Centre’s Cheche Gallery on March 16, 2022. Photo credit: JFJ

Influencing change in Africa, one cartoon at a time

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • ICC shadow looms large over Kenya’s 2022 elections
  • Pre-trial chamber ordered to explain rejection of Mokom counsel
  • A peek into history as Kenya remembers brave mothers and freedom fighters
  • Review of the ICC – A good start but still a bumpy ride ahead
  • Failed promises: No lessons learnt as still no journalists from situation countries at ICC trials

Recent Comments

  • Victims fund project raises questions among CSOs in Kenya on Hope at last for Kenyan victims, but is TFV’s planned support enough?
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Victims fund project raises questions among CSOs in Kenya
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on How we’ll work with Kenyan victims: TFV explains assistance programme
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Hope at last for Kenyan victims, but is TFV’s planned support enough?
  • EL INFIERNO REINA EN EL PARAÍSO DE UGANDA | IBI World España on Why Uganda is not happy to pay less in dispute with DRC

Archives

Categories

JFJ – Journalists for Justice

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Browse by Topics:

Archives by Month:

Never Again
INTAHE
BarometreVerite
The Victims' Bantaba
No Result
View All Result
  • Confronting Impunity
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Login

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz