• About US
  • Our Work
Saturday, April 1, 2023
  • Login
JFJ - Journalists for Justice
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
JFJ - Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result

Ukraine obtains victory over Russia at the ICJ

byThomas Verfuss
June 14, 2022
in ICJ, Tribunal
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
The President of the Court, H.E. Judge Joan E. Donoghue. Photo credit: @CIJ_ICJ

The President of the Court, H.E. Judge Joan E. Donoghue. Photo credit: @CIJ_ICJ

The International Court of Justice has ordered Russia to immediately suspend its military operations in Ukraine.

The court order was read out in the Peace Palace in The Hague by International Court of Justice (ICJ) President Joan Donoghue on Wednesday, March 16, 2022.

The case concerning allegations of genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), brought by Ukraine, was a rather atypical use of the Genocide Convention. That international treaty was drafted and adopted in the 1940s, after World War II and its horrors: the Holocaust, or the Shoah in Hebrew, with concentration camps like Auschwitz and mass executions of Jews in Ukraine by the German troops under the command of dictator Adolf Hitler.

The convention aims at preventing genocide and punishing the perpetrators, if it still occurs. As for other international treaties, states can bring disputes about its violation or interpretation before the ICJ.

RelatedPosts

Kosovo Tribunal to begin trial of former president Thaçi on Monday

New marathon international trial in The Hague?

Félicien Kabuga’s IRMCT trial suspended indefinitely over dementia claims

Such cases are typically brought against an alleged perpetrator by a “victim state”, like when Bosnia sued Yugoslavia in 1993. In 2019 there was a first: The Gambia sued a country in another continent, Myanmar, for the alleged genocide against an ethnic and religious group, the Rohingyas.

Russia alleges that Russian nationals and Russian-speaking people were victims of genocide in eastern Ukraine. So, according to the familiar pattern, one might have expected Russia to sue Ukraine before the ICJ.

Instead, it was the other way round: Russia used the alleged genocide as a pretext for the military intervention, and then Ukraine went to the ICJ. It submitted in its application that the alleged genocide does not give Russia the right to intervene militarily. If Moscow believes there is a genocide, it should address the matter at UN organs, such as the ICJ, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), or the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), Kiev submits. Ukraine says that Russia abused the prevention provision in the Genocide Convention.

The ICJ found that it has no evidence of genocide in Ukraine before it and that to prevent genocide, states may only act within the limits of international law. The ICJ also found that the indication of provisional matters is urgent because of the loss of life in Ukraine and the grave concern that the UNGA expressed about the humanitarian situation: numerous civilian deaths; destruction; and lack of food, water, and electricity.

The court order to Russia to suspend its military operations in Ukraine is a moral victory for Ukraine, though it was not unanimous: the Russian and Chinese judges voted against it. Unfortunately for the Ukrainians, the court order is not enforceable in case of non-observance. The ICJ, the principal judicial organ of the UN, has no police force of its own. In case of violation of the court order, the only recourse for Ukraine is to go to the UNSC, where Russia, with its veto, can prevent any coercive action against itself.

On February 26, 2022, two days after the Russian invasion started, Ukraine filed in the Registry of the court an application instituting proceeding against the Russian Federation concerning a dispute relating to the interpretation, application, and fulfilment of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.

The public hearing started and concluded on March 7, 2022, at the Peace Palace after Ukraine presented its single round of oral arguments. The Russian Federation did not attend the hearing. On that day, Ukraine sought an emergency order from the ICJ to halt hostilities on its territory.

After Wednesday’s urgent court order, a procedure on the merits of the case will follow. Such procedures at the ICJ usually take years.

Previous Post

ICC deputy prosecutors begin their nine-year term

Next Post

Influencing change in Africa, one cartoon at a time

Next Post
From left: Media and communications expert Kimani wa Wanjiru, journalist Tom Odhiambo, cartoonist Celestine Wamiru (Celeste), and syndicated political cartoonist Godfrey Mwampembwa (Gado) participate in a panel discussion during the launch of the second edition of the "Justice Through African Eyes" cartoon exhibition at the Kenya Cultural Centre’s Cheche Gallery on March 16, 2022. Photo credit: JFJ

Influencing change in Africa, one cartoon at a time

Please login to join discussion

Recent Posts

  • Start of Thaçi trial step towards more balanced international(ised) justice
  • Kosovo Tribunal to begin trial of former president Thaçi on Monday
  • UN General Assembly votes yes on Vanuatu proposal on climate change
  • New marathon international trial in The Hague?
  • ICC Issues Arrest Warrants for Putin and Lvova-Belova in Ukraine Conflict

Follow us on Twitter

JFJ – Journalists for Justice

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Subscribe to our Newsletter


Loading

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.