• About US
  • Our Work
Tuesday, September 19, 2023
  • Login
Journalists For Justice (JFJ)
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists For Justice (JFJ)
No Result
View All Result

Victims urge ICC to reject Bensouda’s request not to review the Kenyatta case

byJournalists for Justice
February 7, 2022
in ICC Cases, Kenyan Cases
Reading Time: 2 mins read
14
A A
5
SHARES
50
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Whatsapp

RelatedPosts

ICC opens confirmation of charges hearings for Mokom, alleged CAR war criminal

Former Séléka militia leader pleads not guilty as trial begins

Court lays the groundwork for closing phase in Al Hassan case

 Victims in the President Uhuru Kenyatta Case at the International Criminal Court want the court to deny the Prosecution’s application not to review it.The Victims respectfully request the Chamber to deny the Application and to invite the Prosecution to submit, within a reasonable time, a response to the entirety of the Victims’ Request.   Through their Legal Victim’s Representative, Fergal Gaynor, they state that their arguments are on two issues:   One, that the Kenya II investigation was not effective. All charges against all persons charged in Kenya II were withdrawn before a day of trial was heard, in a case infected by extensive obstruction of access to evidence. The conclusion that the investigation and prosecution of crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court in Kenya II was not effective is a conclusion with which no reasonable observer can disagree.Two, the Victims argue that the Prosecution’s duty under article 54(1) requires it to use all powers conferred upon it by the States Parties in order to gain access to all relevant evidence. Judicial review of whether the Prosecution took all reasonable steps to gain access to relevant evidence is a necessary element of determining whether its decision to subsequently suspend active investigation was lawful.Read   The victims were responding to Fatou Bensouda’s application to the court to reject review of the legality of its decision to cease active investigation in the Kenyatta case.   Read: Anger, bitterness as victims seek to keep Kenyatta case alive   Bensouda had stated Gaynor was informed by letter that, “In the Prosecutor’s view, there is insufficient evidence to substantiate any further prosecution in the Kenya Situation at this time, and that the Prosecution is not conducting further active investigations “at present” because, absent genuine cooperation from Kenya in relation to the pending cooperation requests, there is no immediate prospect of strengthening the evidence already gathered.”

Related

Share2Tweet1Send
Previous Post

I share the victims frustrations in the Kenyatta case, says Bensouda

Next Post

Do not refer us to the ASP for non cooperation says Githu in Uhuru case

Next Post

Do not refer us to the ASP for non cooperation says Githu in Uhuru case

Please login to join discussion

Recent Posts

  • ICC Concludes Charge Confirmation Hearing in Mokom Case
  • ICC opens confirmation of charges hearings for Mokom, alleged CAR war criminal
  • Rwandan detainees face prolonged wait for transfer as IRMCT dismisses request
  • UN court rejects alternative trial procedure for Rwanda genocide suspect Félicien Kabuga
  • From fearless reporting to seeking asylum: Burundian journalist fights to reclaim his voice and safety

Follow us on Twitter

Journalists For Justice (JFJ)

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Subscribe to our Newsletter


Loading

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In