• About US
  • Our Work
Thursday, June 8, 2023
  • Login
JFJ - Journalists for Justice
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
JFJ - Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result

Do not refer us to the ASP for non cooperation says Githu in Uhuru case

byJournalists for Justice
February 6, 2022
in ASP
Reading Time: 2 mins read
14
A A
5
SHARES
50
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Whatsapp

RelatedPosts

Election of deputy prosecutors and review report high on agenda of ICC Assembly of States Parties session

Khan’s supporters welcome his election, but his critics still wary due to his role in Kenya case

States must take the time to choose the right ICC Prosecutor

The Government has written to the Trial Chamber V (B) of the International Criminal Court (ICC) requesting it not to be referred to the Assembly of State Parties to the Rome Statute for noncooperation. In an application to the Trial Chamber, Attorney General Githu Muigai asks the, “Chamber to determine that Kenya had not failed to comply with the Prosecution’s Revised Request, and instead direct the Prosecution to undertake further and effective investigations of its case in order to meaningfully engage the Government of the Republic of Kenya in cooperation on its requests.”   Thus, he states that, “The Government of the Republic of Kenya submits that the Trial Chamber should maintain its decision not to refer the Republic of Kenya to the Assembly of States Parties.”   Githu alleges that, “Chamber to determine that Kenya had not failed to comply with the Prosecution’s Revised Request, and instead direct the Prosecution to undertake further and effective investigations of its case in order to meaningfully engage the Government of the Republic of Kenya in cooperation on its requests. “   Githu alleges that, “At the moment, on the Prosecution’s own admission, the Prosecution is speculative and uncertain of the relevance of the evidence sought by the Revised Request. This is despite more than five years of active and sustained investigations since the prosecution was authorised to initiate proprio motu investigations into the situation in Kenya.”   “Throughout the period in which this issue of cooperation has been pending, the Republic of Kenya has continued to avail unlimited and unrestricted entry to the Republic of Kenya of ICC officials and has continued to avail information and documents and materials available to the Republic of Kenya, not only in the present Kenya One situation case but in the Kenya Two situation case as well. This is in the public domain and the Court can independently verify the same. This case therefore cannot be described as fit and proper for referral to the Assembly of State Parties,” he adds.   Read:    Bensouda wins first round of battle to refer Kenya to ASP for noncooperationAnger, bitterness as victims seek to keep Kenyatta case aliveI share the victims’ frustrations in the Kenyatta case, says Bensouda   Subsequently, 725 victims in President Kenyatta’s case at the ICC want Kenya to be referred to the Assembly of State Parties for not cooperating with the court. Further, they want the Trial Chamber to deny the Prosecution’s application not to review it.

Related

Share2Tweet1Send
Previous Post

Victims urge ICC to reject Bensouda’s request not to review the Kenyatta case

Next Post

William Ruto and Journalist Joshua Sang demand an acquittal of the ICC charges

Next Post

William Ruto and Journalist Joshua Sang demand an acquittal of the ICC charges

Please login to join discussion

Recent Posts

  • ICJ to hold hearings on Ukraine and Russia conflict
  • The greatness of small: A story of strategic political advocacy
  • Swiss court charges Gambian ex-minister Ousman Sonko with crimes against humanity
  • Ben Ferencz, a legend of international justice
  • Old challenges, new point of view: New Registrar’s vision for the ICC

Follow us on Twitter

JFJ – Journalists for Justice

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Subscribe to our Newsletter


Loading

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.