Resources
Wednesday, May 18, 2022
  • Login
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result

Browse by Topic:

  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result
Home ICC Cases

William Ruto and Journalist Joshua Sang demand an acquittal of the ICC charges

Journalists for JusticebyJournalists for Justice
October 27, 2015
in ICC Cases, Kenyan Cases
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
0
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

William Ruto and Journalist Joshua Sang’s defence teams have filed a motion of no case to answer at the International Criminal Court (ICC) citing lack of sufficient evidence from the Prosecution’s witnesses.

In the application filed by Ruto’s lead counsel Karim Khan, the defence outlined five reasons why Ruto should be acquitted of the charges against him.  

Ruto is accused of being criminally responsible as an indirect co-perpetrator pursuant to article 25(3)(a) of the Rome Statute for the crimes against humanity of: murder (article 7(l)(a)); deportation or forcible transfer of population (article 7(l)(d)); and persecution (article 7(l)(h)) committed in the context of the 2007-2008 electoral violence in Kenya. 

Fatou Bensouda, the ICC Chief Prosecutor, noted in her opening statement in the William Ruto and Joshua Sang trial that, “The case which we are about to commence concerns the individual criminal responsibility of the two accused, William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang, for the roles they played in the terrible crimes committed against the Kenyan people during the 2007 Post-Election violence: Mr. Ruto, as a powerful politician, for his role in planning and organizing violence to achieve his political ambitions and satisfy his thirst for political power. Mr. Sang, as a radio broadcaster, for his role in using his public voice to further Mr. Ruto’s criminal plans.” 

On the other hand, Khan requests the Trial Chamber,” To enter a judgment of acquittal in respect of the three counts of crimes against humanity with which Mr. Ruto is charged.” 

RelatedStories

Gicheru witness tampering trial starts before the ICC

Trial Chamber VI to hear Said Abdel Kani case

Court turns down bid to introduce elusive witness’s testimony, but allows four other statements

Khan says the case has been built on hearsay. 

“The Chamber is presented with a situation not specifically addressed in its Decision, nor at any other international criminal tribunal – namely did a case build almost entirely on hearsay, whether it be in respect of the core testimony of the viva voce witnesses or the R68 evidence. OTP’s reliance on hearsay evidence demonstrates a case that has ‘completely broken down’.” 

Thus, “A judgment of acquittal is in the interests of justice whether it be from the perspective of Mr. Ruto or from that of the victims, who should not be led to believe that a conviction could result in this case, or from the standpoint of judicial efficiency and economy,” Khan states. 

This was confirmed based upon the statements of the “Confirmation Six”.  “Only three of these confirmation witnesses appeared before this Chamber, namely: 

P-0658, who failed to testify in line with his original statement, stating, in respect of one meeting relied upon at confirmation,10 that “it [was] not a story that [he]…want[ed] to stand by”;

P-0743, who was declared “a thoroughly unreliable and incredible witness” by the OTP while on the stand; and  (iii) [REDACTED].The fourth witness, P-0025, was withdrawn by the OTP as “not reliable”.

The fifth witness, P-0015, whose [REDACTED] was the subject of the summons decision but the OTP decided not to call him.

Finally, P-0024, who [REDACTED], withdrew cooperation from the OTP for reasons unknown but was not made the subject of a summons request. The evidence relied upon by the PTC to confirm this case has, on any analysis, evaporated. 

On the other hand, Joshua Sang’s lawyers claim the prosecution failed to investigate incriminating and exonerating circumstances, arguing that the case is founded on the evidence of only six witnesses and is almost entirely based on hearsay and speculation.

“The case hinges on a very limited number of uncorroborated allegations contained in written statements signed by blatantly unreliable witnesses who recanted these allegations under oath. Most importantly, none of the allegations brought by recanting or non-recanting witnesses against Mr Sang reveal criminal conduct,” according to Joseph Kipchumba Kigen-Katwa.  

However, the prosecutor has asked judges to dismiss both motions. The Prosecution says, “Evidence presented, taken at its highest, is sufficient to satisfy a reasonable Trial Chamber that the Prosecution has proved all of the essential elements required to secure a conviction of both Accused.”

Previous Post

Do not refer us to the ASP for non cooperation says Githu in Uhuru case

Next Post

Cannibalism, sexual violence atrocities committed in South Sudan: AU Report

Journalists for Justice

Journalists for Justice

Related Posts

Kenyan lawyer Paul Gicheru at the opening of his trial at the International Criminal Court on February 15, 2022. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Gicheru witness tampering trial starts before the ICC

February 16, 2022
Mr Said during the opening of the confirmation of charges hearing at the seat of the Court in The Hague (The Netherlands) on 12 October 2021 ©ICC-CPI

Trial Chamber VI to hear Said Abdel Kani case

December 20, 2021
Paul Gicheru appearing before the ICC via video-link from the ICC Detention Centre on 6 November 2020. Photo credit: ICC-CPI

Court turns down bid to introduce elusive witness’s testimony, but allows four other statements

December 17, 2021
Special Criminal Court Arrests CAR Minister Bouba for War Crimes. Photo: News Central TV

Pressure mounts for CAR minister to face justice

December 2, 2021
ICC Trial Chamber VIII declares Mr Al Mahdi guilty of the war crime of attacking historic and religious buildings in Timbuktu and sentences him to nine years' imprisonment. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Al Mahdi to be released early after ICC cuts sentence by two years

December 1, 2021
Dominic Ongwen's appeal hearing coming up in February 2022. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI.

Ongwen’s appeal hearing to start in February 2022

November 26, 2021
Next Post

Cannibalism, sexual violence atrocities committed in South Sudan: AU Report

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • Hope at last for Kenyan victims, but is TFV’s planned support enough?
  • Gicheru asks ICC judge to admit new evidence
  • Abd-Al-Rahman paid Janjaweed, witness tells judges
  • Gicheru opposes prosecution bid to introduce ‘fresh’ evidence
  • Khan wants Mokom to have access to Yekatom-Ngaïssona trial materials

Recent Comments

  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Kenyan lawyer denies bribery charges at the ICC
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on You did me wrong, Bemba tells ICC as he demands 70 million euros
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Two victims’ lawyers in Kenyatta case in line to become next ICC prosecutor
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Profiles of the four people shortlisted for the job of ICC Prosecutor
  • Write My Essay on Afghanistan case fails to take off at the ICC — pragmatism’ or surrender to the powerful?

Archives

Categories

JFJ – Journalists for Justice

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Browse by Topics:

Archives by Month:

Never Again
INTAHE
BarometreVerite
The Victims' Bantaba
No Result
View All Result
  • Confronting Impunity
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Login

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz