Resources
Friday, May 27, 2022
  • Login
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result

Browse by Topic:

  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result
Home ICC Cases Africa Cases

Dismiss enslavement charge says Ongwen’s lawyer

Journalists for JusticebyJournalists for Justice
January 20, 2020
in Africa Cases, ICC Cases, Ongwen
Reading Time: 7 mins read
A A
0
Dismiss enslavement charge says Ongwen’s lawyer

Dominic Ongwen in court listening to one of his former wives testify in court.

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By Susan Kendi

Dominic Ongwen lead lawyer has requested the International Criminal Court to dismiss the charge of enslavement since the pleading of the charged crime is defective.

In a court record filed on January 10, 2020, Ongwen’ lawyers argue that there is no difference between enslavement and sexual slavery in accordance to the law. The defence said that charging and pleading both charges, brings about legal confusion which prejudices their client’s right to fair trial.

In their argument the defence lawyers cited that, “Historically slaves had sexual obligations in addition to forced labour obligations. Labor-intensive slavery (‘chattel slavery’) and sexual slavery are therefore not mutually exclusive…In all respects and in all circumstances, sexual slavery is slavery.”

The defence lawyers made a reference to two cases held at the ICC, the Bosco Ntaganda and Germain Katanga trials where the forced marriage charge was included under the crimes of sexual slavery and not as two exclusive crimes.

RelatedStories

Gicheru witness tampering trial starts before the ICC

Trial Chamber VI to hear Said Abdel Kani case

Court turns down bid to introduce elusive witness’s testimony, but allows four other statements

According to the Ongwen lawyers, the interpretation of the trial chamber did not help understand the words “acts of sexual nature.”

The Victims lawyers have responded to the defence request in a submission dated January 14, 2020 and asked the Trial chamber IX to dismiss the request.

This is not the first time that the defence have asked ICC judges to dismiss charges that Dominic Ongwen has been charged with. Ongwen lawyers have filed two separate requests in February and September 2019 asking the Judges to dismiss a total of 52 counts of crimes that Ongwen is facing at the International Criminal Court terming them “defective.”

On February 1, 2019 the defence lawyers asked the Court to dismiss more than half of the charges against their client, Ongwen.

In a four-part motion explaining the shortcomings in the 104 page-long confirmation of charges decision against Ongwen, the Defence asked the Trial Chamber IX to dismiss 14 counts that Ongwen is charged with. However, adding up the various defects in the motion for dismissal, the charges that the Defence lawyers want dismissed total to 41 counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

The series format was adopted by the Defence to remain within the 20-page limit set out in the ICC regulations and for “clarity and expediency of the proceedings.”

The prosecution and victims’ lawyers were allowed by the chamber to file a 65-page limit each responding to the issues raised in the motion by the defence and the request for charges dismissal with a deadline set for February 25, 2019.

The Trial Chamber IX Judges dismissed the submissions for being “untimely” since it was filed years after the confirmation of charges decision was made. The Judges also put no considerations on the merits and demerits made by the defence.

The defence team appealed the decision and the appeal chamber unanimously confirmed to the Trial chamber’s ruling adding that the defence can raise the matter of the defective charges while making their closing statements.

On September 20, 2019, the defence filed another motion alleging errors in the confirmation of charges decision with regards to 11 counts of sexual and gender-based crimes that Ongwen is charged with. Ongwen lawyers further argued that the “lack of specificity in the allegations continues to impact on Mr Ongwen’s fair trial rights and the conduct of the Defence presentation of evidence.”

The Trial Chamber IX rejected the defence motion once again in their October 8, 2019 decision terming it “untimely” and adding that they were not convinced by the arguments the defence gave for filing the motion considering they had dismissed a similar motion in February 2019.

So far, Ongwen lawyers have asked the Court to dismiss a total of 53 charges against their clients in their February 2019, September 2019 and most recent January 10, 2020 motions. The counts include 41 counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity, 11 counts of sexual and gender based crimes and 1 request to dismiss the charge of enslavement respectively.

The chamber has also backdated the deadline for submission of closing briefs to February 2020, a decision that was issued eight days after the defence request for the court to reconsider and postpone the date of the closing statements.

Ongwen is facing 70 counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity which include: murder and attempted murder, sexual slavery, forced marriage, torture, enslavement, conscription of children below 15 years of age, pillaging, destruction of property among other crimes allegedly committed in Northern Uganda against the population living in Pajule, Lukodi, Odek and Abok IDP camps.

Background on the trial

The Former Lord Resistance Army Commander, Dominic Ongwen surrendered to the ICC in January 2015.He was transferred to the court’s custody the same month following an arrest that had been issued by the Court.

The confirmation hearing of Dominic Ongwen charges was held between January 21 and 27, 2016 and the trial began on December 6, 2016.

On December 6 and 7, 2016, the prosecution and legal representatives of the victims made their opening statements before judges of the International Criminal Court (ICC).

The first group of 4107 victims is being represented by Joseph Akwenyu Manoba and Francisco Cox whereas the second group of 1,502 victims, who did not select a lawyer, are being represented by Paolina Massidda from the office of the public counsel for victims at the ICC and Jane Adong.

The prosecution’s case ran between January 2017 and April 12, 2018 with 69 witnesses testifying in the trial and on April 13, 2018, the ICC prosecutor Fatou Bensouda informed the Court of the completion of the prosecution’s presentation.

The legal representatives of victims concluded presenting their evidence on May 24, 2018.The victims’ phase opened on May 1, 2018 when the team presented its first witness V-1. The Court heard seven witnesses during this phase, four experts and three participating victims; a counsellor, a teacher and Victim V-2. The witnesses testified on the impact the 30-year-conflict between the LRA and the Ugandan People’s Defence Force had on the population in the northern part of the country and the victims’ suffering.

On June 3 to 9, 2018, the three judges, prosecution, defence and the legal representatives of the victims in the trial visited Pajule, Lukodi, Odek and Abok IDP camps which are the “charged attack sites in the case” and met with community leaders from the area.

On September18, 2018, the defence gave its opening statement and on October 1, 2018 Ongwen lawyers called their first witness.

Over 50 defence witnesses have testified in the case against Ongwen.

Site references

January 10, 2020-Defence motion on the request for dismissal of the charge of enslavement:

https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2020_00039.PDF

January 14, 2020- Victims’ lawyers’ response to the Defence motion:

https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2020_00083.PDF

October 2019 ruling

https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2019_05942.PDF

February 1, 2019 defect motion series

Part 1 of the four part defect series: https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2019_00586.PDF

Part 2 of the four part defect series: https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2019_00588.PDF

Part 3 of the four part defect series: https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2019_00589.PDF

Part 4 of the four part defect series: https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2019_00590.PDF

Previous Post

Correction

Next Post

Hope as South Sudanese Government, rebels agree to peace deal

Journalists for Justice

Journalists for Justice

Related Posts

Kenyan lawyer Paul Gicheru at the opening of his trial at the International Criminal Court on February 15, 2022. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Gicheru witness tampering trial starts before the ICC

February 16, 2022
Mr Said during the opening of the confirmation of charges hearing at the seat of the Court in The Hague (The Netherlands) on 12 October 2021 ©ICC-CPI

Trial Chamber VI to hear Said Abdel Kani case

December 20, 2021
Paul Gicheru appearing before the ICC via video-link from the ICC Detention Centre on 6 November 2020. Photo credit: ICC-CPI

Court turns down bid to introduce elusive witness’s testimony, but allows four other statements

December 17, 2021
Special Criminal Court Arrests CAR Minister Bouba for War Crimes. Photo: News Central TV

Pressure mounts for CAR minister to face justice

December 2, 2021
ICC Trial Chamber VIII declares Mr Al Mahdi guilty of the war crime of attacking historic and religious buildings in Timbuktu and sentences him to nine years' imprisonment. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Al Mahdi to be released early after ICC cuts sentence by two years

December 1, 2021
Dominic Ongwen's appeal hearing coming up in February 2022. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI.

Ongwen’s appeal hearing to start in February 2022

November 26, 2021
Next Post
Hope as South Sudanese Government, rebels agree to peace deal

Hope as South Sudanese Government, rebels agree to peace deal

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • Said Abdel Kani to remain in custody as Appeals Chamber rejects his plea for release
  • Are we ready? CSOs audit Kenya’s election preparedness
  • Parties prepare to wind up Gicheru case
  • Hope at last for Kenyan victims, but is TFV’s planned support enough?
  • Gicheru asks ICC judge to admit new evidence

Recent Comments

  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Kenyan lawyer denies bribery charges at the ICC
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on You did me wrong, Bemba tells ICC as he demands 70 million euros
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Two victims’ lawyers in Kenyatta case in line to become next ICC prosecutor
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Profiles of the four people shortlisted for the job of ICC Prosecutor
  • Write My Essay on Afghanistan case fails to take off at the ICC — pragmatism’ or surrender to the powerful?

Archives

Categories

JFJ – Journalists for Justice

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Browse by Topics:

Archives by Month:

Never Again
INTAHE
BarometreVerite
The Victims' Bantaba
No Result
View All Result
  • Confronting Impunity
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Login

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz