• About US
  • Our Work
Tuesday, March 21, 2023
  • Login
JFJ - Journalists for Justice
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
JFJ - Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result

Pre-trial hearing sets stage for next phase of Abd-Al-Rahman case

byJournalists For Justice
June 16, 2021
in Africa Cases, ICC Cases
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
ICC Pre-Trial Chamber II during the confirmation of charges hearing at the seat of the Court in The Hague (The Netherlands) on 24, 25 and 26 May 2021. Photo credit: ICC-CPI

ICC Pre-Trial Chamber II during the confirmation of charges hearing at the seat of the Court in The Hague (The Netherlands) on 24, 25 and 26 May 2021. Photo credit: ICC-CPI

By Janet Sankale

The International Criminal Court’s Pre-Trial Chamber II recently held confirmation of charges hearings in the case The Prosecutor v. Ali Muhammad Ali Abd-Al-Rahman (“Ali Kushayb”).

This is an important step in the process of transitional justice at the International Criminal Court (ICC) and determines whether the prosecution’s evidence meets the threshold to send the case to trial.

The hearings for the Abd-Al-Rahman case were held from May 24-26, 2021 at the seat of the ICC in The Hague. The prosecution and defence counsels, as well as the legal representatives of the victims made their oral submissions before the judges. The judges of the pre-trial chamber started deliberations after the conclusion of the sessions and are expected to deliver their written decision within 60 days.

RelatedPosts

Former Séléka militia leader pleads not guilty as trial begins

Court lays the groundwork for closing phase in Al Hassan case

Al Hassan trial resumes after break

The judges have three options. First, they can confirm all or some of the charges they consider to be supported by sufficient evidence (i.e. substantial grounds to believe the suspect is guilty) and commit the suspect to be tried before a trial chamber.

Secondly, the judges can decline the charges if they find insufficient evidence to support them in court, and stop the proceedings against Abd–Al-Rahman.

The judges also have the option of adjourning the hearing and requesting the Prosecutor to provide further evidence, conduct further investigations, or amend any of the charges.

If the pre-trial chamber judges find that there are substantial grounds to believe that the person committed the alleged crimes, they can confirm the charges, either in full or in part, and allow the case to enter the trial stage.

In her opening statement on Monday 24, Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda stated that Ali Muhammad Ali Abd-Al-Rahman, commonly known as Ali Kushayb (according to the prosecution, but contested by the defence) is charged with 31 counts of crimes against humanity and war crimes. These include the crimes of torture, rape, and murder of civilians in the Wadi Salih and Mukjar localities of West Darfur State, between August 2003 and April 2004.

The prosecutor described Abd-Al-Rahman as “feared and revered” in equal measure as the “colonel of colonels”, and that he was a senior leader of the Janjaweed militia in the Wadi Salih and Mukjar localities during the period.

Bensouda noted that confirmation of charges was an important step in the process of achieving justice for the victims. “The evidence shows that Abd-Al-Rahman was a knowing, willing, and energetic perpetrator of these crimes,” she told the court. According to the prosecution, he played a crucial role, leading attacks, committing murders, and ordering other murders. The Prosecutor asked the chamber to confirm all the charges it had presented and commit the case for trial.  

Cyril Laucci led Abd-Al-Rahman’s defence team, while 151 victims were represented by lawyers Paolina Massidda, Amal Clooney, and Nasser Mohamed Amin Abdalla. Laucci objected to the Prosecutor’s charges against his client and said he intended to contest the ICC’s jurisdiction over crimes committed in Darfur because of issues with the UN referral.

The United Nations Security Council (UNSC), through Resolution 1593, referred the situation in Darfur, Sudan, to the Prosecutor of the ICC. Although Sudan is not a party to the Rome Statute, it is a member of the United Nations (UN). The Darfur situation fell under the ICC jurisdiction in March 2005 under chapter VII of the UN’s Charter, which sets out the UNSC’s task to maintain peace and security. It allows the council to “determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression” and to take military and non-military action to “restore international peace and security”.

The Rome Statute allows the UNSC to refer a “situation” to the ICC, as one of the non-military actions at its disposal.

The referral was to investigate alleged crimes against humanity, war crimes, and genocide committed since 2002 by Sudanese officials, Janjaweed militia, and rebel forces. Abd-Al-Rahman is part of the Sudan situation together with former Sudanese president Omar al-Bashir, Ahmad Harun, Abdel Raheem Muhammad Hussein, Muhammad Hussein Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain (Abdallah Banda), and Bahar Idriss Abu Garda.

Harun, Nourain, and Hussein are still at large. The Pre-Trial Chamber declined to confirm the charges against Garda and the case is considered closed until or unless the Prosecutor presents new evidence.

The violence in Darfur began in 2003, when rebels protested against what they contended as the Sudanese government’s disregard for the western region and its non-Arab population. In response, the government, under the presidency of Omar al-Bashir, equipped and supported Arab militias – which came to be known as Janjaweed – to fight the insurrection in Darfur. The militias also terrorised civilians and prevented international aid organisations from delivering to the region much-needed food and medical supplies.

The ICC has accused Bashir of orchestrating genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes in Darfur. The ICC issued warrants of arrest on March 4, 2009 and July 12, 2010. Bashir was removed from office in 2019 and has been in the custody of the Sudanese government pending his transfer to the ICC, where his case remains in the pre-trial stage.

The ICC issued two arrest warrants against Abd-Al-Rahman, who voluntarily surrendered in the Central African Republic and was transferred to ICC custody on June 9, 2020. His initial appearance before the ICC took place on June 15, 2020, to verify his identity and ensure that he was informed of the charges against him and his rights under the Rome Statute. He has since been held at the ICC Detention Centre and has two times been denied provisional release while awaiting trial.

For further information on this case:

  • https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/record.aspx?docNo=ICC-02/05-01/20-325 (Prosecution’s submission of the Document Containing the Charges)
  • https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2007_02908.PDF#_blank (First warrant of arrest)
  • https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/record.aspx?docNo=ICC-02/05-01/07-74-Red (Second warrant of arrest)
  • https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/record.aspx?docNo=ICC-02/05-01/20-415 (Judgment on the appeal of Mr Abd-Al-Rahman against Pre-Trial Chamber II’s ‘Decision on the review of detention’)
  • Case information sheet: English, French, العربية
  • Questions and Answers on the confirmation of charges: English, French, Arabic

Previous Post

United Nations Security Council must pay for ICC investigations, says lawyer

Next Post

Karim Khan to be sworn in as new ICC Prosecutor

Next Post
Karim Khan to be sworn in as new ICC Prosecutor

Karim Khan to be sworn in as new ICC Prosecutor

Please login to join discussion

Recent Posts

  • New marathon international trial in The Hague?
  • ICC Issues Arrest Warrants for Putin and Lvova-Belova in Ukraine Conflict
  • Félicien Kabuga’s IRMCT trial suspended indefinitely over dementia claims
  • Darfur victims to wait longer for justice as Khan’s new strategy faces challenges
  • The Hague to host new Ukraine Damage Register

Follow us on Twitter

JFJ – Journalists for Justice

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Subscribe to our Newsletter


Loading

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.