Resources
Sunday, February 28, 2021
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Confronting Impunity
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion
  • About US
  • Our Work
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
  • Home
  • Confronting Impunity
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion
  • About US
  • Our Work
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result
Home ASP

States must take the time to choose the right ICC Prosecutor

Journalists For Justice by Journalists For Justice
February 11, 2021
in ASP, Commentary, Headline, Opinion and Analysis, Top Story
5 min read
0
The International Criminal Court (ICC) states parties convene at the World Forum Convention Center in The Hague from December 5-12, 2018, for the 17th session of the Assembly of state parties Credit: The ASP Flickr account

The International Criminal Court (ICC) states parties convene at the World Forum Convention Center in The Hague from December 5-12, 2018, for the 17th session of the Assembly of state parties Credit: The ASP Flickr account

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By Prof. Jennifer Trahan in New York

The election of the next ICC Prosecutor is obviously extremely significant; the direction of the Court for the next nine years is at stake.  The entire process, from start to now, has been disjointed and mishandled, but it is not too late to put some order, standards, procedure, and safeguards into the process.  What matters for now, is that there not be a rush to decision.

RelatedPosts

Khan’s supporters welcome his election, but his critics still wary due to his role in Kenya case

First time in history: a vote on who becomes new ICC Prosecutor

States split between Karim Khan and Fergal Gaynor for ICC Prosecutor

The original process has appeared to be flawed from the start with only four short-listed candidates, among whom only one seemed highly qualified for the post.  Even reaching that point seemed odd, with the Canadian nominee lacking international experience, yet another Canadian prosecutor with extensive international criminal tribunal experience, Robert Petit, not making the short list.  

Dissatisfaction with the short list caused a scramble for a longer list, which was then created.  Odd as it seems, in light of this second list being narrowed to three contenders this week, a fourth candidate was just added, with elections set for this Friday, February 12, 2021.  (Of the current short list of four, and the earlier short list of four, there is only one candidate on both lists.)  Elections have been set because there has emerged no consensus around any candidate.  States were uncomfortable in reaching consensus in part because the vetting process was incomplete.

By this disjoined process, what has been skipped is timely consideration and proper vetting, with rumors now flying around (some patently false, and some that really warrant further investigation).  Indeed, serious allegations have come to the ASP President, and they have not been even shared with ICC member states.  What states can do now is not rush the process.  Prosecutor Bensouda is in place until June, and there is no need to settle this on Friday.  (Indeed, the OTP could no doubt progress under the able leadership of its current Deputy Prosecutor even beyond June.)  States still have time to put on the breaks, not rush to judgment, when there are some serious potential qualification issues surfacing.

The Prosecutor obviously guides the work of the Office of the Prosecutor, but is also the person who most personifies the Court to the general public, particularly when reaching out to and meeting with victims.  Who that person is then matters to the utmost.  In light of her qualifications and as a Gambian national, the choice of Prosecutor Bensouda nine years ago, particularly in light of tensions then surfacing with certain African states, was an obvious choice and allowed for her election by consensus.

While the candidates’ qualifications are of huge significance (and this is why proper vetting is absolutely critical), another factor is the optics of the choice and how that will play out to national and international audiences.  

Above all, this should not be a matter of politics of states backing the candidate from their state (which it appears to have become), but about ensuring that the most qualified candidate is chosen.  That should always be the standard, whether for judicial or prosecutorial elections.  And alas, in both regards, there will be many “lessons learned” from this past year about how not to conduct the process.

Another unfortunate aspect of where things stand is that, due to safety restrictions necessitated by Covid, civil society has had very little role in all of this.  Civil society normally plays a very vibrant role related to the ICC, and has tried to do so, through press releases etc.  Due to the impossibility of most in-person meetings, significant activity of the ICC’s Assembly of States Parties (ASP) unfortunately has occurred in venues from which civil society was entirely excluded. 

Last, but not least, I would be remiss if I did not point out that of the current, new short list of four candidates that has emerged this week Karim Khan (UK), Fergal Gaynor (Ireland), Carlos Castresana (Spain) and Francesco Lo Voi (Italy), there is not a single female candidate, and the original short list of four had only one female candidate, alas with no international criminal tribunal experience.  (The last set of judicial elections at least did well on this score, righting a previous gender-imbalance.)

States have a decision of the utmost significance facing them.  They must take the time to make the decision through a deliberative process, after sufficient vetting, not a process dominated by politicking.  The post of ICC Prosecutor is probably the most significant post for the Court, and a misstep here could cost the ICC, which already is facing significant challenges, dearly.

Jennifer Trahan is Clinical Professor at NYU’s Center for Global Affairs and Director of their Concentration in International Law and Human Rights.

Previous Post

First time in history: a vote on who becomes new ICC Prosecutor

Next Post

Khan’s supporters welcome his election, but his critics still wary due to his role in Kenya case

Related Posts

The newly elected ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan

Khan’s supporters welcome his election, but his critics still wary due to his role in Kenya case

by Millicent Zighe
February 22, 2021

...

First time in history: a vote on who becomes new ICC Prosecutor

First time in history: a vote on who becomes new ICC Prosecutor

by Thomas Verfuss
February 10, 2021

...

African NGOs strongly advise for or against Khan as new ICC chief prosecutor

States split between Karim Khan and Fergal Gaynor for ICC Prosecutor

by Millicent Zighe
February 7, 2021

...

Kenyan Lawyer, Paul Gicheru makes first appearance before the ICC

Paul Gicheru gives exclusive interview to Kenyan newspaper

by Susan Kendi
February 7, 2021

...

123 states in search of new prosecutor

123 states in search of new prosecutor

by Thomas Verfuss
February 5, 2021

...

Carlos Castresana outlines his vision for the ICC

Carlos Castresana outlines his vision for the ICC

by Millicent Zighe
February 5, 2021

...

Next Post
The newly elected ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan

Khan’s supporters welcome his election, but his critics still wary due to his role in Kenya case

Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
Connect with
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
  Subscribe  
Notify of

FollowJFJustice

JFJ – Journalists for Justice

We call out impunity and raise victim voices to demand accountability for atrocity crimes wherever they occur.

Follow Us

Archives

Our Microsites

Never Again
INTAHE
BarometreVerite
The Point
No Result
View All Result
  • Confronting Impunity
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion
  • About US
  • Our Work

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz