Resources
Monday, June 27, 2022
  • Login
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result

Browse by Topic:

  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result
Home ICC Cases

ICC judges rule to wade into Rohingya crisis

Journalists For JusticebyJournalists For Justice
September 7, 2018
in ICC Cases
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
0
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By Susan Kendi

The International Criminal Court has ruled that it may exercise jurisdiction over the alleged deportation of the Rohingya people from Myanmar to Bangladesh.

Judges voted 2-1 to exercise jurisdiction over the Rohingya crisis, in a 50-page decision which observed that there were two separate crimes — deportation and forcible transfer of people.

The judges explained that, although Myanmar is not a state party of the Rome Statute, deportation begins in a non-state party by use of force or threats and completed by crossing a border into a state that is a treaty signatory, Bangladesh.

Judges PĂ©ter Kovács and Reine AdĂ©laĂŻde Sophie Alapini-Gansou formed the majority while Judge Marc Perrin de Brichambaut partly disagreed arguing that the proper procedure was not followed in seeking the court’s advisory opinion. The prosecutor is required to seek the court’s permission to conduct an investigation on a matter. Moreover, the court is not allowed to advise the parties on how to apply the law.

RelatedStories

Gicheru witness tampering trial starts before the ICC

Trial Chamber VI to hear Said Abdel Kani case

Court turns down bid to introduce elusive witness’s testimony, but allows four other statements

Judge de Brichambaut added that the court cannot rule on its own authority over the alleged deportation of the Rohingya people at this stage. Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda sought the court’s decision on whether it had jurisdiction after receiving and reviewing 42 individual communications, reports and pieces of public information on the crimes committed on the Rohingya people. The majority decision allows Bensouda to proceed with her analysis of the facts and decide whether to request the court’s permission to investigate. 

Myanmar has not submitted any observations before the Court despite the judges’ invitation. On April 13, 2018, the Government of Myanmar stressed in a statement that it was not a party to the Rome Statute, adding: “Nowhere in the ICC charter does it say that the court has jurisdiction over states which have not accepted that jurisdiction. The UN Vienna Convention on international treaties states that no treaty can be imposed on a country that has not ratified it.”

On August 9, 2018, the Myanmar government refused to respond to the prosecutor’s request highlighting several concerns such as bad faith, irregularities on procedure and the lack of fairness and transparency on the litigation process.

Fact box

On April 9, 2018, the Prosecutor made a submission requesting a ruling on whether the Court may exercise jurisdiction over the alleged deportation of the Rohingya people from Myanmar to Bangladesh. 

The president of the Pre-Trial Division assigned the request to the chamber, which invited on May 7, 2018, the competent authorities of Bangladesh to submit written observations by June 11, 2018, on the Prosecutor’s request, which they did. 

The chamber allowed certain individuals and organisations to submit their amici curiae observations on the request between May 29 to June 14, 2018.

Reports reviewed by the prosecution reveal that since August 2017 over 670,000 Rohingya living in Myanmar have been deported across the international border into Bangladesh. 

The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights described the Rohingya crisis as “a textbook example of ethnic cleansing”, and according to the UN Special Envoy for human rights in Myanmar, potentially bears the “hallmarks of a genocide.”  

Although such crimes have been reported since at least 2012, they rose on August 25, 2017, to a new level when there was a commencement of a “clearance operation” aimed at deporting all remaining Rohingya across the border to Bangladesh and continued at this scale for several months. 

Myanmar security forces collaborated with other individuals and attacked the Rohingya population in particular in Rakhine State in a “well-organised, coordinated and systematic” way intended to drive the Rohingya population out of the country.

These attacks allegedly included killings, rape, torture, and enforced disappearances affecting thousands of victims. They also allegedly included the destruction and looting of hundreds of villages, as well as livestock, crops and other personal property. The perpetrators seem to have targeted in particular people and objects representing the cultural and religious identity of the Rohingya.

The Rohingya minority has suffered years of persecution within Myanmar, and during that time they have been increasingly deprived of various fundamental rights, including eventually being stripped of their Myanmar citizenship.

Previous Post

What Bosco Ntaganda told judges at the ICC

Next Post

Supporters circle the wagons around the ICC after John Bolton’s stinging assault

Journalists For Justice

Journalists For Justice

Related Posts

Kenyan lawyer Paul Gicheru at the opening of his trial at the International Criminal Court on February 15, 2022. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Gicheru witness tampering trial starts before the ICC

February 16, 2022
Mr Said during the opening of the confirmation of charges hearing at the seat of the Court in The Hague (The Netherlands) on 12 October 2021 ©ICC-CPI

Trial Chamber VI to hear Said Abdel Kani case

December 20, 2021
Paul Gicheru appearing before the ICC via video-link from the ICC Detention Centre on 6 November 2020. Photo credit: ICC-CPI

Court turns down bid to introduce elusive witness’s testimony, but allows four other statements

December 17, 2021
Special Criminal Court Arrests CAR Minister Bouba for War Crimes. Photo: News Central TV

Pressure mounts for CAR minister to face justice

December 2, 2021
ICC Trial Chamber VIII declares Mr Al Mahdi guilty of the war crime of attacking historic and religious buildings in Timbuktu and sentences him to nine years' imprisonment. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Al Mahdi to be released early after ICC cuts sentence by two years

December 1, 2021
Dominic Ongwen's appeal hearing coming up in February 2022. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI.

Ongwen’s appeal hearing to start in February 2022

November 26, 2021
Next Post

Supporters circle the wagons around the ICC after John Bolton's stinging assault

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • From Kyiv to Kabul and Darfur: Challenges of reporting justice and human rights
  • Gicheru to attend court session remotely
  • After euphoria of state white paper, victims now demand action on Jammeh
  • Right the Wrongs: Spotlight on the 2020 General Election in Tanzania
  • Selective approach to TRRC recommendations a sure recipe for defeating justice

Recent Comments

  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Kenyan lawyer denies bribery charges at the ICC
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on You did me wrong, Bemba tells ICC as he demands 70 million euros
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Two victims’ lawyers in Kenyatta case in line to become next ICC prosecutor
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Profiles of the four people shortlisted for the job of ICC Prosecutor
  • Write My Essay on Afghanistan case fails to take off at the ICC — pragmatism’ or surrender to the powerful?

Archives

Categories

JFJ – Journalists for Justice

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Browse by Topics:

Archives by Month:

Never Again
INTAHE
BarometreVerite
The Victims' Bantaba
No Result
View All Result
  • Confronting Impunity
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Login

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz