Resources
Monday, June 27, 2022
  • Login
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result

Browse by Topic:

  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result
Home Commentary

Supporters circle the wagons around the ICC after John Bolton’s stinging assault

Journalists For JusticebyJournalists For Justice
September 13, 2018
in Commentary, ICC Cases
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
0
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By Susan Kendi and Brian Obara

Several countries and human rights organizations have piped up in support of the International Criminal Court (ICC) days after US President Donald Trump’s national-security adviser John Bolton gave the court a tongue-lashing in a speech on Monday.

Bolton, in a fusillade of verbal salvos that has received much attention from the media and triggered consternation and confusion in human rights circles, warned ICC judges and prosecutors that they would face individual criminal charges, arrests and economic sanctions if they charged any American who served in Afghanistan with war crimes. Bolton also told ICC officials to tread carefully on Israel and other allies.

“If the court comes after us, Israel or other US allies, we will not sit quietly,” he said.

The US is a signatory to the Rome Statute but has not ratified it since 2000 when then president Bill Clinton signed it. When President George W. Bush succeeded Clinton, Bolton played a lead role in the administration’s effort to undermine the ICC.

RelatedStories

Gicheru witness tampering trial starts before the ICC

Trial Chamber VI to hear Said Abdel Kani case

Court turns down bid to introduce elusive witness’s testimony, but allows four other statements

Perilous times

Human rights organizations and States parties to the Rome Statute led by Assembly of States Parties (ASP) President O-Gon Kwon have leapt to the defence of the world’s only permanent war crimes court. O-Gon, in a statement released by the ICC’s Public Affairs Unit, pointedly rebutted Bolton’s claims without mentioning him by name:

“The International Criminal Court is an independent and impartial judicial institution crucial for ensuring accountability for the gravest crimes under international law. The Court is non-political and acts strictly within the legal framework of the Rome Statute, its founding treaty,” said Kwon in a brief statement.

The Principality of Liechtenstein, which has consistently championed the ICC’s work, urged other supporters of the Court to stick by it in these perilous times:

“20 years after the historic adoption of the #RomeStatute of the #ICC, to which 123 countries from all regions of the world are party, the rules-based international order is under increasing attack, making political support for the independence of the ICC more important than ever!” tweeted the Official Account of the Permanent Mission of Liechtenstein to the UN.

The statement of support from Germany’s Foreign Office stuck to the theme of the ICC being under attack:

“Since 2002, the International Criminal Court @IntlCrimCourt has been enforcing international law in cases of the most serious crimes. We are committed to the work of the ICC — in particular when it comes under fire.”

Human rights organizations were less cautious in their response to Bolton’s tirade.

Elizabeth Evenson, an Associate Director at Human Rights Watch’s International Justice Program said the “most outlandish” part of Bolton’s “bluster” was the “threat to prosecute in US courts ICC judges and prosecutors who bring legal action against Americans.”

Evenson said Bolton was mocking the plight of victims:

“ICC officials and member countries are unlikely to be cowed by Bolton’s disdain for the court. But his speech was a stark affront to victims of atrocity crimes seeking justice. The ICC has its shortcomings, but it serves as a powerful signal to perpetrators and victims alike that justice for the worst crimes is possible,” she wrote.

Adotei Akwei, Deputy Director of Advocacy and Government Relations at Amnesty International USA took a similar line:

“The United States’ attack on the International Criminal Court is an attack on millions of victims and survivors who have experienced the most serious crimes under international law and undermines decades of groundbreaking work by the international community to advance justice.”

Amnesty International’s Centre for International Justice meanwhile called on more states parties to rebuke Bolton:

 “John Bolton’s threats to the ICC’s judges and prosecutors was an attack on the international rule of law. All states parties to the ICC, especially those whose nationals are affected, must strongly condemn those remarks and publicly support the Court’s staff.”

Is the damage already done?

In a sign that Bolton’s words could provide a convenient shield to forces hostile to the ICC and erode the Court’s authority, the Leader of Majority in Kenya’s National Assembly tweeted on Tuesday that Bolton’s verbal assault on the ICC “vindicated” the Kenyan government for its own anti-ICC stance:

“It’s now confirmed that ICC “is an illegitimate court, a political instrument used by the Europeans”. We are vindicated,” he wrote.

Previous Post

ICC judges rule to wade into Rohingya crisis

Next Post

Point signs agreement to raise reporting standards for truth process

Journalists For Justice

Journalists For Justice

Related Posts

Kenyan lawyer Paul Gicheru at the opening of his trial at the International Criminal Court on February 15, 2022. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Gicheru witness tampering trial starts before the ICC

February 16, 2022
Mr Said during the opening of the confirmation of charges hearing at the seat of the Court in The Hague (The Netherlands) on 12 October 2021 ©ICC-CPI

Trial Chamber VI to hear Said Abdel Kani case

December 20, 2021
Paul Gicheru appearing before the ICC via video-link from the ICC Detention Centre on 6 November 2020. Photo credit: ICC-CPI

Court turns down bid to introduce elusive witness’s testimony, but allows four other statements

December 17, 2021
Special Criminal Court Arrests CAR Minister Bouba for War Crimes. Photo: News Central TV

Pressure mounts for CAR minister to face justice

December 2, 2021
ICC Trial Chamber VIII declares Mr Al Mahdi guilty of the war crime of attacking historic and religious buildings in Timbuktu and sentences him to nine years' imprisonment. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Al Mahdi to be released early after ICC cuts sentence by two years

December 1, 2021
Dominic Ongwen's appeal hearing coming up in February 2022. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI.

Ongwen’s appeal hearing to start in February 2022

November 26, 2021
Next Post

Point signs agreement to raise reporting standards for truth process

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • From Kyiv to Kabul and Darfur: Challenges of reporting justice and human rights
  • Gicheru to attend court session remotely
  • After euphoria of state white paper, victims now demand action on Jammeh
  • Right the Wrongs: Spotlight on the 2020 General Election in Tanzania
  • Selective approach to TRRC recommendations a sure recipe for defeating justice

Recent Comments

  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Kenyan lawyer denies bribery charges at the ICC
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on You did me wrong, Bemba tells ICC as he demands 70 million euros
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Two victims’ lawyers in Kenyatta case in line to become next ICC prosecutor
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Profiles of the four people shortlisted for the job of ICC Prosecutor
  • Write My Essay on Afghanistan case fails to take off at the ICC — pragmatism’ or surrender to the powerful?

Archives

Categories

JFJ – Journalists for Justice

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Browse by Topics:

Archives by Month:

Never Again
INTAHE
BarometreVerite
The Victims' Bantaba
No Result
View All Result
  • Confronting Impunity
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Login

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz