Resources
Sunday, July 3, 2022
  • Login
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result

Browse by Topic:

  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result
Home ICC Cases Africa Cases

Witness says Ugandan army aimed to break LRA morale by targeting key leaders

Journalists For JusticebyJournalists For Justice
September 28, 2017
in Africa Cases, ICC Cases
Reading Time: 7 mins read
A A
0
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By Tom Maliti

A Ugandan army colonel told the International Criminal Court (ICC) that the army’s aim during the conflict in northern Uganda was to break the morale of the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) by targeting key leaders of the rebel group.

Colonel Joseph Balikuddembe told the court on Thursday that the Uganda People’s Defence Forces (UPDF) did not study deeper how the LRA was organized as part of its counter-insurgency strategy.

Balikuddembe said on Thursday that he did not know some of the LRA commanders he met in 2006 were part of the LRA high command. He told the court he thought they were commanders with Dominic Ongwen, who at the time was commander of Sinia brigade.

Ongwen is on trial at the ICC for his alleged role in attacks on four camps for internally displaced people (IDPs) that took place between 2003 and 2004. Ongwen is also on trial for his alleged role in sex crimes and conscripting and using child soldiers. In total, he has been charged with 70 counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity. He has pleaded not guilty to all counts.

RelatedStories

Gicheru witness tampering trial starts before the ICC

Trial Chamber VI to hear Said Abdel Kani case

Court turns down bid to introduce elusive witness’s testimony, but allows four other statements

Balikuddembe testified on Wednesday that between 2003 and 2006 he was posted to different parts of northern Uganda with the UPDF. He said during that period he served with the 301 Brigade; 55 Infantry Battalion; and the 601 Brigade in different positions, ending with his becoming brigade commander of the 601 Brigade.

Ongwen’s lawyers, Abigail Bridgman and Krispus Ayena Odongo, questioned Balikuddembe on Thursday about how the UPDF gathered and used intelligence on the LRA and details about the UPDF’s size and operations against the LRA. They also asked about how militia groups called Local Defence Units related with the UPDF and details about a 2006 meeting Balikuddembe had with Ongwen.

“From your work in northern Uganda fighting the LRA, would you say the LRA units fit within the definition of a military organization?” asked Bridgman.

“I cannot describe their kind of brigades,” replied Balikuddembe.

“Just from your work against the LRA, did you get to know the command structure and the way they organized their units?” asked Bridgman.

“First of all, for us in UPDF, we looked at the leadership of the LRA that would drive the insurgency. We did not look at their command structure,” said Balikuddembe.

He elaborated that some of the leaders they looked at were LRA leader Joseph Kony, Ongwen, and Okot Odhiambo. According to a witness who testified on September 15, Odiambo became commander of the Stockree brigade in 2004, one of the years Balikuddembe was questioned about.

Balikuddembe said the UPDF thought targeting such leaders, “would break the morale of the LRA.”

Later in the day when Bridgman asked Balikuddembe about his meeting with Ongwen at Lacekocot in 2006, she asked whether he knew the rank or role of two of the commanders who were with Ongwen.

Bridgman first asked him about Ajumani, who acted as interpreter between him and Ongwen during that meeting.

“Would you be surprised he was a chief (of the) protection unit for (LRA Leader) Joseph Kony around that period?” asked Bridgman.

“Ajumani?” asked Balikuddembe.

“Yes,” said Bridgman.

“I am not aware,” he replied.

A little later Bridgman asked him about Acaya Doctor, another of the commanders who was with Ongwen during that meeting.

“Now regarding Acaya Doctor, were you aware that he was the director of operations for the entire LRA?” asked Bridgman.

“I am not aware but I took them as part of Ongwen’s commanders,” replied Balikuddembe.

During Thursday’s hearing, Bridgman asked Balikuddembe about any role the UPDF had in cutting off the LRA’s food supply. All previous witnesses who have testified about LRA attacks, particularly on IDP camps, have said the LRA always took away food during those attacks.

“As part of your operations, duties, was it within the framework of your strategy to make sure that the LRA was deprived of food supplies?” asked Bridgman.

“My Lord, we could not deprive the LRA from getting food supplies. We knew that they were supported by Sudan and they were well supplied. Depriving the LRA of food supplies meant that we were punishing those that were abducted,” replied Balikuddembe.

Another line of questioning Bridgman followed was about the relationship between militias known as Local Defence Units (LDU) and the UPDF.

Balikuddembe said the LDUs were formed when IDP camp residents approached the UPDF and said they wanted to participate in the protection of the camps. He said each LDU operated only around the camp its members were drawn from. He said they did not operate across camps or outside the county or district they were based in.

Bridgman asked whether the LDUs had a structure different from the UPDF.

“I would (say) yes, but they were commanded by UPDF officers,” said Balikuddembe.

Later, Bridgman asked him for more details about the relationship between the LDUs and the UPDF.

“Who recruited them?” she asked.

“The UPDF,” replied Balikuddembe.

“Who trained them?” asked Bridgman.

“UPDF,” he answered.

“Who armed them?” asked Bridgman.

“UPDF,” Balikuddembe replied.

Subsequently, Bridgman asked about discipline in the LDUs and how it was enforced.

“If an LDU member misbehaved, were they taken to military courts?” asked Bridgman.

“Yes, they were bound by the military code of conduct,” replied Balikuddembe.

Several questions later, Bridgman asked, “Were you aware of incidents involving the LDUs where they opened fire on civilians?”

“My Lord, I am not aware of that,” replied Balikuddembe.

Some time later Bridgman asked whether he was aware of cases of, “people who had left the LDU being tortured and dying.”

“I would say that desertion in the forces worldwide do happen. I would say it is true others were court martialled. But the question of torture, I did not come across anybody who was arrested, tortured and even dying. I am not aware,” answered Balikuddembe.

After Bridgman finished questioning Balikuddembe, Odongo had some questions for him. A line of questioning Odongo pursued concerned the LRA attack on Pajule that Balikuddembe testified about on Wednesday.

Odongo confirmed from Balikuddembe that he had said the UPDF rescued some abductees about 10 days after the attack on Pajule, which took place on October 10, 2003.

“Mr. Balikuddembe, would it surprise you if I said that by the 20th of October, the LRA were way out of Pader (in northern Uganda). As a matter of fact, they were in Soroti (in Teso in eastern Uganda)?” asked Odongo.

“Your Honour, remember that groups of LRA remained in Pader and even other groups remained in Gulu (in northern Uganda). Not all the LRA went to Soroti,” replied Balikuddembe.

Odongo’s questions concluded Thursday’s hearing and Balikuddembe’s testimony. Presiding Judge Bertram Schmitt said Witness P-233 would begin testifying on Friday.

Previous Post

How Kony had LRA deputy leader Vincent Otti killed, by witness

Next Post

Q &A: Archbishop John Baptist Odama on the trial of Dominic Ongwen

Journalists For Justice

Journalists For Justice

Related Posts

Kenyan lawyer Paul Gicheru at the opening of his trial at the International Criminal Court on February 15, 2022. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Gicheru witness tampering trial starts before the ICC

February 16, 2022
Mr Said during the opening of the confirmation of charges hearing at the seat of the Court in The Hague (The Netherlands) on 12 October 2021 ©ICC-CPI

Trial Chamber VI to hear Said Abdel Kani case

December 20, 2021
Paul Gicheru appearing before the ICC via video-link from the ICC Detention Centre on 6 November 2020. Photo credit: ICC-CPI

Court turns down bid to introduce elusive witness’s testimony, but allows four other statements

December 17, 2021
Special Criminal Court Arrests CAR Minister Bouba for War Crimes. Photo: News Central TV

Pressure mounts for CAR minister to face justice

December 2, 2021
ICC Trial Chamber VIII declares Mr Al Mahdi guilty of the war crime of attacking historic and religious buildings in Timbuktu and sentences him to nine years' imprisonment. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Al Mahdi to be released early after ICC cuts sentence by two years

December 1, 2021
Dominic Ongwen's appeal hearing coming up in February 2022. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI.

Ongwen’s appeal hearing to start in February 2022

November 26, 2021
Next Post

Q &A: Archbishop John Baptist Odama on the trial of Dominic Ongwen

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • 20 years of the ICC: The hopes, the disappointments, the future
  • Judge to decide Gicheru’s fate after parties conclude case
  • From Kyiv to Kabul and Darfur: Challenges of reporting justice and human rights
  • Gicheru to attend court session remotely
  • After euphoria of state white paper, victims now demand action on Jammeh

Recent Comments

  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Kenyan lawyer denies bribery charges at the ICC
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on You did me wrong, Bemba tells ICC as he demands 70 million euros
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Two victims’ lawyers in Kenyatta case in line to become next ICC prosecutor
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Profiles of the four people shortlisted for the job of ICC Prosecutor
  • Write My Essay on Afghanistan case fails to take off at the ICC — pragmatism’ or surrender to the powerful?

Archives

Categories

JFJ – Journalists for Justice

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Browse by Topics:

Archives by Month:

Never Again
INTAHE
BarometreVerite
The Victims' Bantaba
No Result
View All Result
  • Confronting Impunity
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Login

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz