Resources
Monday, June 27, 2022
  • Login
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result

Browse by Topic:

  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
  • Home
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion & Analysis
  • Human Rights
  • Elections
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Careers
No Result
View All Result
Journalists for Justice
No Result
View All Result
Home ICC Cases Africa Cases

Yekatom arrest: Prosecutorial opportunism or meaningful justice justice?

Journalists For JusticebyJournalists For Justice
November 19, 2018
in Africa Cases, ICC Cases, Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
0
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By Thomas Verfuss

The transfer of (former) militia leader Alfred Yekatom to The Hague on Saturday came as a pleasant surprise to victims in the Central African Republic, to NGOs working on the CAR — and those inside and outside the International Criminal Court who fear that the ICC might run out of suspects to try in the foreseeable future.

In the academic debate on social media like Twitter, the term “prosecutorial opportunism” popped up again immediately. In simple terms, this means the suspicion that international criminal courts “just take what they can get”.

Contemporaneous international criminal courts and tribunals are a relatively new phenomenon. They all start off with an empty prison (like the new Kosovo Tribunal, which is in the process of being set up in The Hague) and have to justify their existence (and the money the international community spends on them – the annual circus of ICC budget negotiations will soon reach its culmination point again at the Assembly of States Parties in December).

The first of those new international criminal jurisdictions was the tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) set up in 1993. Many said it should go after political leaders like Radovan Karadzic – whom, in the absence of a police force, it could not get. So the first ICTY detainee whom the tribunal could get hold of was Dusko Tadic, who was already in custody in Germany – a former village policeman, thus a small fish.

RelatedStories

Selective approach to TRRC recommendations a sure recipe for defeating justice

Gicheru witness tampering trial starts before the ICC

Trial Chamber VI to hear Said Abdel Kani case

The ICC, in its two first trials, also started off with two suspects it could “get” from the Democratic Republic of Congo because they were already in custody in the DRC for other reasons: Thomas Lubanga and Germain Katanga. And the government in Kinshasa was happy to get rid of them and send them to The Hague.

In the Yekatom case, the arrest warrant was only issued when the man also known as Rambo was already in custody for other reasons – the army arrested him after he was involved in a shooting in parliament. The crimes he has been charged for – like murder, torture, deportation, recruiting child soldiers – were committed in 2013 and 2014. They have been documented long ago by the United Nations and NGOs like the FIDH. But the Prosecutor of the ICC only asked the judges of the Pre-Trial Chamber for an arrest warrant on October 30, a few days after Yekatom had been arrested in parliament.

Some argue that Yekatom should be tried before the Special Criminal Court in Bangui, which has been recently set up with the support of the international community – in the spirit of “positive complementarity”. The ICC is a court of last resort, which is only supposed to come into action when national justice systems are unable or unwilling to do so. Some experts argue that the judges of the Pre-Trial Chamber should have refused the arrest warrant after a so-called “admissibility test”, saying: there is a court in Bangui that can try him, so he must be tried there.

But it would be too simplistic to just paint a somewhat cynical image of “prosecutorial opportunism” and “institutional survival”. Observers in the CAR feared for civil unrest – thousands of anti-Balaka (Yekatom’s militia) supporters might riot.

And taking Yekatom to The Hague avoids any temptation for the participants at the ongoing national peace talks to grant him amnesty – a price some might want to pay in a situation where most of the national territory is still not under the control of the central government.

See also: https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item.aspx?name=pr1418

Previous Post

Witness tells ICC Ugandan army nearly caught Kony in 2010

Next Post

ICC cooperation crisis: Empty courtrooms and 15 (known) fugitives at large

Journalists For Justice

Journalists For Justice

Related Posts

Gambian Justice Minister Dawda Jallow released the Government White Paper on the Report of the Truth, Justice and Reparations Commision on May 25, 2022. Photo credit: Facebook

Selective approach to TRRC recommendations a sure recipe for defeating justice

June 2, 2022
Kenyan lawyer Paul Gicheru at the opening of his trial at the International Criminal Court on February 15, 2022. Photo credit: @ICC-CPI

Gicheru witness tampering trial starts before the ICC

February 16, 2022
Mr Said during the opening of the confirmation of charges hearing at the seat of the Court in The Hague (The Netherlands) on 12 October 2021 ©ICC-CPI

Trial Chamber VI to hear Said Abdel Kani case

December 20, 2021
Paul Gicheru appearing before the ICC via video-link from the ICC Detention Centre on 6 November 2020. Photo credit: ICC-CPI

Court turns down bid to introduce elusive witness’s testimony, but allows four other statements

December 17, 2021
Empty seats in one of the two big plenary halls (accessible only via limited badges and special tickets for NGO observers) on Day 2. (Credit: Shirleen Chin)

COP26 failed to deliver, so ICC and ICJ the next stop for seekers of climate justice

December 2, 2021
Special Criminal Court Arrests CAR Minister Bouba for War Crimes. Photo: News Central TV

Pressure mounts for CAR minister to face justice

December 2, 2021
Next Post

ICC cooperation crisis: Empty courtrooms and 15 (known) fugitives at large

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please login to comment
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
No Result
View All Result

Recent Posts

  • From Kyiv to Kabul and Darfur: Challenges of reporting justice and human rights
  • Gicheru to attend court session remotely
  • After euphoria of state white paper, victims now demand action on Jammeh
  • Right the Wrongs: Spotlight on the 2020 General Election in Tanzania
  • Selective approach to TRRC recommendations a sure recipe for defeating justice

Recent Comments

  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Kenyan lawyer denies bribery charges at the ICC
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on You did me wrong, Bemba tells ICC as he demands 70 million euros
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Two victims’ lawyers in Kenyatta case in line to become next ICC prosecutor
  • JFJ - Journalists for Justice on Profiles of the four people shortlisted for the job of ICC Prosecutor
  • Write My Essay on Afghanistan case fails to take off at the ICC — pragmatism’ or surrender to the powerful?

Archives

Categories

JFJ – Journalists for Justice

We call out impunity wherever it occurs; we advocate justice for all victims of atrocity crimes; and we work with people of goodwill everywhere who share our values.

Browse by Topics:

Archives by Month:

Never Again
INTAHE
BarometreVerite
The Victims' Bantaba
No Result
View All Result
  • Confronting Impunity
  • Communities of Justice
  • Opinion
  • About US
  • Our Work
  • Login

Copyright © 2019. Journalists for Justice has asserted its right to be recognized as creators and owners of the content here. Reproduction in part or in whole is permitted on condition that JFJ is acknowledged and notified.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz